Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds SAQsacute-care-resuscitation-and-toxicology

Paeds SAQs · acute-care-resuscitation-and-toxicology

Hydrocarbon, caustic and household chemical exposure — formative SAQs

Two MedVellum formative short-answer questions on paediatric household chemical exposure. SAQ 1 covers a hydrocarbon (lamp oil) ingestion: the aspiration risk, the contraindications of induced emesis and gastric lavage, the six-hour observation, and the discharge criteria. SAQ 2 covers a caustic (drain cleaner) ingestion: the contraindication to neutralisation, the timing of endoscopy, the Zargar grading, and the surgical and surveillance plan. The marks and timing support transparent self-assessment. They are not an official board format or pass standard.

20 marks30 min5 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWERACP DCERCPCH Progress+MRCPCH TheoryMRCPCH ClinicalABP General PediatricsACGME PediatricsRCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWERACP DCERCPCH Progress+MRCPCH TheoryMRCPCH ClinicalABP General PediatricsACGME PediatricsRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
SAQ 1 covers a lamp-oil ingestion in a toddler: the aspiration risk, the contraindications of induced emesis and gastric lavage, the six-hour observation pathway, and the discharge criteria. SAQ 2 covers a drain-cleaner (sodium hydroxide) ingestion: the contraindication to neutralisation, the timing of endoscopy between six and twenty-four hours, the Zargar endoscopic grading, and the surgical and long-term surveillance plan.
Assessment contract

This is a MedVellum formative exercise: 20 marks over a suggested 30 minutes, divided into two 10-mark SAQs with 15 minutes suggested for each. These marks, timings and grids are authored for transparent practice and self-assessment; they are not a published RACP, RCPCH, ABP or RCPSC examination format, allocation, pass mark or standard-setting method. The referenced guidelines are linked to show the curriculum and evidence context for toxicology, not to imply official endorsement of this exercise. [1] [8]

SAQ 1 — A lamp-oil ingestion in a toddler

Question 1 — 10 formative marks; suggested time 15 minutes [8]

A two-year-old, twelve-kilogram child is brought in forty minutes after swallowing a mouthful of lamp oil. He coughed and gagged at the scene but did not vomit. In the department he is alert, with a respiratory rate of 28, oxygen saturation 98 per cent on air, and clear chest on auscultation. A nurse asks whether to give ipecac to bring the oil back up. [8] [9]

  1. State the immediate decontamination decision and justify it with the mechanism. (2 marks)
  2. Outline the observation pathway and the chest X-ray strategy over the next six hours. (3 marks)
  3. Give the discharge criteria at six hours and the safety-net advice. (2 marks)
  4. Describe the management if the child becomes tachypnoeic and hypoxaemic at four hours, including the position of corticosteroids and prophylactic antibiotics. (3 marks) [8]

Full-credit answer — SAQ 1

Reveal full-credit answer for SAQ 1ShowHide

1. Decontamination decision

I would not give ipecac, would not perform gastric lavage, and would not give activated charcoal. Lamp oil is a very low-viscosity petroleum distillate whose dominant threat is aspiration pneumonitis rather than systemic absorption. Its low viscosity and low surface tension mean that a small aspirated volume spreads rapidly into the alveoli, disrupts surfactant and causes a chemical pneumonitis; inducing emesis or lavaging would provoke just such an aspiration and convert a contained exposure into a worse one. Activated charcoal does not adsorb hydrocarbons. [8]

2. Observation and chest X-ray

I observe the child for six hours, monitoring the respiratory rate, the work of breathing and the oxygen saturation throughout. I take a chest X-ray now as a baseline and repeat it if he becomes symptomatic; if he remains well, a film at the end of the observation period is taken at the discretion of the local protocol. I am aware that radiographic changes can lag behind symptoms by hours, so a normal early film does not exclude evolving pneumonitis. I call the poisons information centre with the product in hand to confirm the observation period. [8] [9]

3. Discharge criteria and safety net

I discharge at six hours if he is asymptomatic, with an oxygen saturation at or above his baseline on air, no increased work of breathing, and a normal or unchanged chest X-ray. I give a clear safety net: return immediately if cough, breathlessness, fever or drowsiness develop, and apply poison-prevention advice on safe storage. I confirm there is no safeguarding concern. [8]

4. Management of deterioration at four hours

Tachypnoea and hypoxaemia at four hours signal evolving hydrocarbon pneumonitis, so I admit him and begin supportive respiratory care with supplemental oxygen, escalating to high-flow nasal therapy, non-invasive or invasive ventilation as his work of breathing and saturation demand, with intensive care involvement for respiratory failure. I do not give corticosteroids or prophylactic antibiotics as routine, because the early illness is a chemical rather than an infective pneumonitis and these agents do not improve outcome; I treat proven secondary bacterial infection on its merits. In refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome I arrange specialist retrieval and consider surfactant and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. [8] [9]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Hoffman RS, Burns MM, Gosselin S Ingestion of Caustic Substances New England Journal of Medicine, 2020.PMID 32348645
  2. [3]Irlayıcı FI, Elmas A, Akcam M Corrosive substance ingestion in children: clinical features, management and outcomes in a tertiary care setting European Journal of Pediatrics, 2025.PMID 40802074
  3. [4]Bolia R, Sarma MS, Biradar V, Sathiyasekaran M, Srivastava A Current practices in the management of corrosive ingestion in children: A questionnaire-based survey and recommendations Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021.PMID 33991312
  4. [8]Das S, Behera SK, Xavier AS, Selvarajan S Prophylactic Use of Steroids and Antibiotics in Acute Hydrocarbon Poisoning in Children Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2020.PMID 29673294
  5. [9]Reddy MV, Ganesan SL, Narayanan K, Jayashree M, Singhi SC, Nallasamy K, et al Liquid Mosquito Repellent Ingestion in Children Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2020.PMID 31768860
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousHumane restraint and behavioural support in emergency care — formative SAQsacute-care-resuscitation-and-toxicologyNextHypovolaemic and haemorrhagic shock — formative SAQsacute-care-resuscitation-and-toxicology