Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM TopicsClinical handover and ISBAR

EM · Clinical handover and ISBAR

Clinical handover and the ISBAR framework in the emergency department

Also known as ISBAR handover · SBAR communication · Clinical handover · Patient handoff · Transfer of care communication · ED-to-ICU handover · Shift change handover · Paramedic-to-ED handover · IMIST-AMBO · I-PASS handoff

Clinical handover and the ISBAR framework in the emergency department — the structured transfer of information and responsibility at every care transition; the five elements of ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) and how the Identifier distinguishes ISBAR from its parent SBAR; the alternative and extended structures (SBAR, ISOBAR, IMIST-AMBO for paramedic-to-ED, I-PASS for the trainee-to-trainee handoff); the six ED handover types (triage-to-treatment, shift change, ED-to-ward, ED-to-ICU, ED-to-retrieval, ED-to-theatre) and the emphasis, recipient and risk profile of each; the applied steps of a structured handover from preparation through the receiver's readback to the explicit transfer of responsibility; the com…

medium8 referencesUpdated 26 July 202619 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEMFRCPCCCFPEMEBEEM

Red flags

  • The verbal-only handover is the information-loss default — unstructured, undocumented, and unrepeated, it is a leading cause of handover failure and the harm that follows
  • A handover that omits the explicit transfer of responsibility leaves two teams each believing the other is in charge — state the transfer aloud and confirm it is received
  • The receiver who does not synthesise and read back closes no loop — the readback is the step that catches the omission before the team departs
  • The handover given under time pressure, with the receiver multitasking or interrupted, loses the critical detail — protect the handover from interruption
  • The junior unable to escalate against a steep authority gradient gives a recommendation-shaped-as-a-question — ISBAR exists to flatten the gradient and force the explicit ask
On this page

Related topics

  • Team-based care and crisis resource management in the emergency department
  • Patient disposition and safety-netting in the emergency department
  • Breaking bad news and communication in the emergency department — the SPIKES framework
  • Medical error and patient safety in the emergency department
  • Trauma team leadership
  • The primary survey (ABCDE) — the trauma assessment framework
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEMFRCPCCCFPEMEBEEM

Red flags

  • The verbal-only handover is the information-loss default — unstructured, undocumented, and unrepeated, it is a leading cause of handover failure and the harm that follows
  • A handover that omits the explicit transfer of responsibility leaves two teams each believing the other is in charge — state the transfer aloud and confirm it is received
  • The receiver who does not synthesise and read back closes no loop — the readback is the step that catches the omission before the team departs
  • The handover given under time pressure, with the receiver multitasking or interrupted, loses the critical detail — protect the handover from interruption
  • The junior unable to escalate against a steep authority gradient gives a recommendation-shaped-as-a-question — ISBAR exists to flatten the gradient and force the explicit ask
The one-line answer

A clinical handover is the structured transfer of information AND responsibility at every care transition. The ED standard is ISBAR — Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation — and the Identifier is what distinguishes ISBAR from its parent SBAR. The point of the structure is to flatten the authority gradient, force an explicit ask (not a question), and close the loop with a receiver readback.[1][6]

Meet the patient

The intensive-care consultant answers the phone at 03:00. The ED registrar says: "Doctor, I think we have a problem with a lady down here — she's pretty sick." The consultant waits. There is no identifier, no situation, no vital signs, no clear ask. The line goes silent. The consultant does not know who the patient is, where she is, or why she was called.[1]

The registrar has handed over without a structure. The single most examinable principle in this topic — and the one the I-PASS trial turned into the strongest evidence in patient safety — is that the verbal-only, unstructured handover is the information-loss default, and the structured, read-back handover is the engineered defence.[2]

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References8ShowHide
  1. [1]Haig KM, Sutton S, Whittington J. SBAR: a shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2006.PMID 16617948
  2. [2]Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R, et al. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 25372088
  3. [3]Humphrey KE, Sundberg M, Milliren CE, et al. Frequency and Nature of Communication and Handoff Failures in Medical Malpractice Claims J Patient Saf, 2022.PMID 35188927
  4. [4]Harthi N, Almuwallad A, Albargi H, et al. Trauma handover practices between ambulance clinicians, emergency department staff and trauma teams: scoping review BMC Emerg Med, 2026.PMID 41588499
  5. [5]Gheri F, Presti C, Donnarumma F, et al. Assessing Handover Quality in the Emergency Department: Evaluating Communication Between EMS and Triage Nurses Using the Handoff CEX Italian Scale J Emerg Nurs, 2026.PMID 40833308
  6. [6]Lazzari C, Rabottini M. The use of Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation handover in the COVID-19 pandemic and non-COVID clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis Front Health Serv, 2025.PMID 40851885
  7. [7]Yari M, Izadi-Avanji FS, Sabery M. Assessment of clinical handover among ICU nurses based on the structured ISBAR model (2025) BMC Nurs, 2026.PMID 41943136
  8. [8]Rasiya A, Raheem UA. Shift Transition Communication Among Nurses: A Systematic Review of ISBAR and SBAR-Based Structured Handover Tools Nurs Open, 2026.PMID 42338059

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousChest trauma (the immediately and potentially life-threatening injuries)Chest traumaNextComa and GCS assessmentComa

Related topics

  • Team-based care and crisis resource management in the emergency department
  • Patient disposition and safety-netting in the emergency department
  • Breaking bad news and communication in the emergency department — the SPIKES framework
  • Medical error and patient safety in the emergency department
  • Trauma team leadership
  • The primary survey (ABCDE) — the trauma assessment framework