EM · Communication and breaking bad news
Breaking bad news and communication in the emergency department — the SPIKES framework
Also known as SPIKES protocol · Breaking bad news · Death notification · Open disclosure · Goals-of-care discussion
Breaking bad news and difficult communication in the emergency department — the SPIKES six-step protocol (Setting, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotion, Strategy/Summary), the governing principles of privacy, protected time, sitting down, silence, empathy and the warning shot, and the four high-stakes ED scenarios of death notification, the peri-arrest goals-of-care discussion, the medical-error disclosure and the new life-changing diagnosis. Covers the symptom-control pharmacology of the peri-arrest and dying patient, cultural considerations, open-disclosure obligations, and the clinician debrief and self-care. The framework is the centrepiece of the ACEM and FRCEM OSCE communication stations. ACEM-primary, globally tagged.
Practise this topic
On this page & tools
Your progress
Saved locally on this device.
8 MCQs with explanations
Target exams
Red flags
Meet the patient
A 58-year-old woman is brought in by her husband with two weeks of painless jaundice and a six-kilogram weight loss. The CT today shows a pancreatic-head mass with liver metastases — likely metastatic adenocarcinoma. The husband has not been told the result, and the patient believes she has a gallstone. Before you say a word about the scan, you must ask what she already understands, sit down, silence the phone, and give the warning shot.[1]
The two questions that govern every difficult conversation are the two SPIKES answers in sequence: what does the patient already know? (Perception) and how much do they want to hear now? (Invitation). Skip either, and the Knowledge step fails twice over — wrong order, wrong language.[1]
You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship atlas.
References22Show ledgerHide ledger
- [1]Long DA, Koyfman A, Long B. Oncologic Emergencies: Palliative Care in the Emergency Department Setting J Emerg Med, 2021.PMID 33092975
- [2]Lei C, Moadel T, Bentley S, et al. Difficult Conversation Case: Death Notification J Educ Teach Emerg Med, 2025.PMID 41522637
- [3]Ginsburg J, Zamamiri S, Howell M, et al. Difficult Conversation Case: Missed Testicular Cancer J Educ Teach Emerg Med, 2025.PMID 41522639
- [4]Jabre P, Belpomme V, Azoulay E, et al. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23484827
- [5]Paladino J, Bernacki R, Neville BA, et al. Evaluating an Intervention to Improve Communication Between Oncology Clinicians and Patients With Life-Limiting Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of the Serious Illness Care Program JAMA Oncol, 2019.PMID 30870556
- [6]Hui D, Bohlke K, Bao T, et al. Management of Dyspnea in Advanced Cancer: ASCO Guideline J Clin Oncol, 2021.PMID 33617290
- [7]Hui D, De La Rosa A, Wilson A, et al. Neuroleptic strategies for terminal agitation in patients with cancer and delirium at an acute palliative care unit: a single-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised trial Lancet Oncol, 2020.PMID 32479786
- [8]Taburee W, Dhippayom T, Nagaviroj K, Dilokthornsakul P. Effects of Anticholinergics on Death Rattle: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis J Palliat Med, 2023.PMID 36194053
- [9]Franken LG, de Winter BC, van Esch HJ, et al. Pharmacokinetic considerations and recommendations in palliative care, with focus on morphine, midazolam and haloperidol Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol, 2016.PMID 27081769
- [10]Sathornviriyapong A, Nagaviroj K, Anothaisintawee T. The association between different opioid doses and the survival of advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care BMC Palliat Care, 2016.PMID 27871265
- [11]Johnson J, Panagioti M. Interventions to Improve the Breaking of Bad or Difficult News by Physicians, Medical Students, and Interns/Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Acad Med, 2018.PMID 29877913
- [12]Holmes SN, Illing J. Breaking bad news: tackling cultural dilemmas BMJ Support Palliat Care, 2021.PMID 33762267
- [13]Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature Health Serv Res, 2007.PMID 17362215
- [14]Roze des Ordons AR, Sinclair D, et al. Family presence during adult resuscitation from cardiac arrest: A systematic review Resuscitation, 2022.PMID 36087636
- [15]Wilson JG, English DP, Owyang CG, et al. End-of-Life Care, Palliative Care Consultation, and Palliative Care Referral in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review J Pain Symptom Manage, 2020.PMID 31586580
- [16]Arantzamendi M, Belar A, Payne S, et al. Clinical Aspects of Palliative Sedation in Prospective Studies. A Systematic Review J Pain Symptom Manage, 2021.PMID 32961218
- [17]Rapid discharge checklists for people at the end of life who present to the emergency department Emerg Nurse, 2026.PMID 41664485
- [18]Thornton R, Nicholson P, Harms L. Scoping Review of Memory Making in Bereavement Care for Parents After the Death of a Newborn J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 2019.PMID 30946804
- [19]The role of specialist nurses for organ donation: A solution for maximising organ donation rates? J Clin Nurs, 2019.PMID 30549359
- [20]Price J, Jordan J, Prior L, et al. A consensus for change: parent and professional perspectives on care for children at the end-of-life Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs, 2013.PMID 23600569
- [21]Scott SD, Hirschinger LE, Cox KR, et al. The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider "second victim" after adverse patient events Qual Saf Health Care, 2009.PMID 19812092
- [22]Haig KM, Sutton S, Whittington J. Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review BMJ Open, 2018.PMID 30139905