Paeds · investigations-procedures-and-technology
Audiology and hearing-test interpretation
Also known as Audiogram interpretation · Tympanometry · Otoacoustic emissions · OAE · Auditory brainstem response · ABR / BAER · Newborn hearing screening
Fellowship guide to paediatric hearing-test interpretation. Covers reading the pure-tone audiogram (axes, symbols, air versus bone conduction, the air-bone gap, the pure-tone average) and the paediatric degree-of-loss thresholds normal at or under 15 dB HL through slight, mild, moderate, moderately severe, severe and profound; the Jerger tympanogram types A, B, C, As and Ad using admittance, peak pressure and ear canal volume, and why the 1000 Hz probe tone is preferred under six months; otoacoustic emissions as a test of cochlear outer hair cell function; the auditory brainstem response as a test of the whole pathway to the brainstem; the two-stage newborn screen with OAE then automated ABR and the 1-3-6 early hearing detection and intervention milestones; the age-appropriate behavioural tests; and the patterns that separate otitis media with effusion, congenital cytomegalovirus-related loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, with the ANZ, UK and North American screening and guideline differences.
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Practise this topic
Target exams
Red flags
- A child whose newborn screen referred but is lost to follow-up — a missed permanent childhood hearing loss in the first year silently derails speech, language and social development, and the diagnostic window for the 1-3-6 timeline closes
- An OAE-only screen that reports a 'pass' in a child who actually has auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder — otoacoustic emissions are preserved in auditory neuropathy, so the outer hair cells look normal while the neural pathway is impaired, and only an ABR would have caught it
- Using 25 dB HL as the normal threshold in a child — the paediatric normal is at or under 15 dB HL, so a 20 dB loss that looks 'normal' against an adult cut-off is in fact a slight hearing loss that can affect consonants and early literacy
- Reading a type B tympanogram as permanent sensorineural loss without separating the air-bone gap — the effusion produces a mild conductive loss that can mask an underlying permanent loss, and over-diagnosis leads to unnecessary referral while under-diagnosis misses it
- A child with risk indicators for late-onset loss who passed the newborn screen and is discharged from surveillance — congenital cytomegalovirus and family history produce progressive or late-onset loss that a single passed screen cannot exclude
- Tympanometry with a 226 Hz probe tone in an infant under six months — the stiff infant middle ear needs a 1000 Hz probe tone, and the 226 Hz tone yields a flat trace that falsely suggests effusion in a normal ear
Life stages
Care settings
Clinical exam formats
Board mappings
- Investigations and procedures
- Interpret common audiological investigations in infants and children
- Recognise the patterns of conductive and sensorineural hearing loss
- Current 2026 PREP curriculum — Learning goal 11: Investigations and procedures
- Renewed curriculum for first-year trainees from 2027 — Learning goal 11: Investigations and procedures
- Interpret audiometry, tympanometry, otoacoustic emissions and ABR in infants and children
- Written Examination
- Clinical Applications
- Hearing loss and audiological investigation interpretation
- Short Cases
- Investigation interpretation stations
- Communication and counselling around referred newborn hearing screens
- 11. Investigating and managing paediatric presentations
- Level 2: Requests and interprets appropriate audiological investigations for children
- Patient safety: recognising risk indicators for late-onset hearing loss
- Applied Knowledge in Practice (AKP)
- Foundations of Practice (FOP)
- Audiology: audiogram, tympanometry, OAE and ABR interpretation; newborn hearing screening
- Clinical
- Communication scenarios: counselling a family after a referred newborn hearing screen
- Investigation interpretation
- General Pediatrics Content Outline — Hearing assessment and screening
- General Pediatrics Content Outline — Interpretation of audiometry and tympanometry
- General Pediatrics EPA: Request and interpret audiological investigations
- Patient Care 3: Procedural skills and test interpretation
- Medical Knowledge 1: Clinical knowledge
- Systems-Based Practice: screening programmes and surveillance
- Medical Expert
- Communicator
- Pediatrics: Interpret paediatric audiological investigations and counsel families
Overview & Definition
Picture the two-week-old baby who referred on the newborn hearing screen and has just arrived at the clinic, or the three-year-old whose nursery teacher worries he is not turning when his name is called. In both, the question is whether this child can hear well enough to acquire speech — and the audiological tests answer it by interrogating different parts of the hearing mechanism in turn. That is the territory this page owns. [1]
Audiology is the measurement of hearing, and in children it has to match the test to the age and to the part of the pathway in question. The pure-tone audiogram measures the softest sound the cochlea can detect at each frequency and gives the degree and type of loss. Tympanometry measures how the eardrum and middle ear move in response to a pressure change and tells you whether the middle ear is aerated, fluid-filled, or under negative pressure. Otoacoustic emissions (OAE) are the faint sounds generated by the cochlear outer hair cells that leak back out into the ear canal; they test the cochlea. The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is the electrical signature the auditory nerve and brainstem produce a few milliseconds after a click or tone, and it tests the whole pathway from cochlea to brainstem. [1] [5]
What makes paediatric audiology distinct from adult audiology is that the child usually cannot raise a hand to signal a threshold, so the tests divide into physiological measures that need no cooperation (OAE, ABR, tympanometry — used in newborns and infants) and behavioural measures that build cooperation by age (behavioural observation, visual reinforcement audiometry, play audiometry, then conventional pure-tone testing). The fellowship skill being tested is choosing the right test for the age, reading pattern tests produce together, and never being reassured by a single test that does not answer the whole question — above all, never accepting an OAE pass as proof of hearing in a child at risk of auditory neuropathy. [1] [11]
References12ShowHide
- [1]Harlor AD Jr, Bower C Hearing assessment in infants and children: recommendations beyond neonatal screening Pediatrics, 2009.PMID 19786460
- [2]Awad R, Oropeza J, Uhler KM Meeting the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Standards in a Large Metropolitan Children's Hospital: Barriers and Next Steps Am J Audiol, 2019.PMID 31084570
- [3]Gellrich D, Eder K, Echternach M, Gröger M, et al A Comparison of 226- and 1000-Hz Probe Tone Tympanometry With Myringotomy Findings in Infants Am J Audiol, 2024.PMID 39413047
- [4]Pilka E, Kochanek K, Jedrzejczak WW, Saczek A, et al Comparison of tympanometry results for probe tones of 226 Hz and 1000 Hz in newborns Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2021.PMID 34175657
- [5]Hunter LL, Blankenship CM, Gunter RG, Keefe DH, et al Cochlear Microphonic and Summating Potential Responses from Click-Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses in High-Risk and Normal Infants J Am Acad Audiol, 2018.PMID 29708492
- [6]Buonsenso D, Pedrero-Tomé R, Raimondi F, Salomé S, et al Prognostic Factors of Late-onset Hearing Loss in Infants With Congenital Cytomegalovirus and Normal Audiologic Assessment at Birth Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2026.PMID 40838764
- [7]Chung PK, Schornagel FAJ, Goeman J, Vossen ACTM Predicting mid-term hearing and developmental outcome in clinically inapparent congenital cytomegalovirus infection with hearing loss at birth Early Hum Dev, 2025.PMID 41101277
- [8]Abdul-Hadi S, Choo DI What Is the Most Effective Management of Congenital Cytomegalovirus-Related Hearing Loss? Laryngoscope, 2026.PMID 42370518
- [9]Bamford J, Fortnum H, Bristow K, Smith J, et al Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen Health Technol Assess, 2007.PMID 17683682
- [10]Atherton KM, Poupore NS, Clemmens CS, Nietert PJ, et al Sociodemographic Factors Affecting Loss to Follow-Up After Newborn Hearing Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2023.PMID 36939626
- [11]Santarelli R, Scimemi P, Cama E, Domínguez-Ruiz M, et al Preservation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in OTOF-Related Hearing Impairment Ear Hear, 2024.PMID 37677959
- [12]Mackey AR, Bussé AML, Del Vecchio V, Mäki-Torkko E, et al Protocol and programme factors associated with referral and loss to follow-up from newborn hearing screening: a systematic review BMC Pediatr, 2022.PMID 35932008