O&G SAQs · Critical care — escalation and safety-net
Obstetric early warning scores and escalation — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on a triggered obstetric early warning score in a post-caesarean patient with evolving sepsis. Tests bedside ABCDE with obstetric modification, reproduction of MEWT triggers verbatim, the design principles and validation evidence of obstetric EWS (Singh, Shields, Hedriana, Edwards), and the escalation pathway. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page & tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from specifics: named trigger thresholds, named validation studies with their numbers, the architectural distinction between aggregate and single-parameter systems, and a defined escalation pathway. Write in short labelled points, not prose paragraphs. Answer the sub-part you are asked. [5][6]
Reveal model answer and mark scheme
(a) Immediate assessment and investigations by domain (5 marks)
One mark per domain covered, with the investigations named. [5][6]
- ABCDE with obstetric modification: 15-degree left lateral tilt, high-flow oxygen, two large-bore cannulae, balanced crystalloid, compute the shock index (122/96 = 1.27 — significant loss or sepsis until proven otherwise).
- Sepsis domain: lactate (the bedside number that moves first — above 2 mmol/L is a sick obstetric patient, above 4 mmol/L is shock), blood cultures, urine culture, wound and vaginal swabs, FBC, CRP, coagulation, venous or arterial blood gas.
- Cardiopulmonary domain: ECG, troponin, NT-proBNP, chest X-ray (single PA film is below fetal-harm dose), bedside echo if cardiac failure on the differential.
- Haemorrhage domain: inspect the wound (the midwife documented ooze), FBC, coagulation with fibrinogen, crossmatch. Concealed retroperitoneal bleed is on the differential of a post-caesarean patient with tachycardia and hypotension.
- Source hunt: examine the wound, the uterus, the lochia, the chest, the urine, the calves (DVT). Plan a focused bedside ultrasound for free fluid.[6]
Working diagnosis statement for the reasoning mark: "Multi-parameter deterioration with fever and tachypnoea — this is sepsis with possible wound infection until proven otherwise; haemorrhage and cardiopulmonary event are the parallel differentials." [5]
(b) MEWT severe single-value triggers, sustained (3 marks)
Reproduce verbatim, with the 20-minute rule and the rationale. [3][4]
- Maternal heart rate above 130 bpm.
- Respiratory rate above 30 per minute.
- Mean arterial pressure under 55 mmHg.
- Oxygen saturation under 90%.
- Altered mental status, or nurse concern.[3][4]
The 20-minute rule: triggers must be sustained for more than 20 minutes (or two abnormal values in the non-severe band) — this is the design feature that filters transient physiology (post-epidural effect, anxiety, post-contraction tachycardia) from real deterioration.[3]
Rationale: single sustained abnormal values are highly specific for serious pathology; the persistence requirement trades a small loss of sensitivity for a large gain in specificity, reducing alarm fatigue.[4]
(c) Design principles and the two architectural families (4 marks)
One mark for each family with its validation study, and two marks for the cross-cutting principles. [1][3]
- Aggregate-weighted scoring (MEOWS): each parameter is assigned points for deviation from normal; points are summed; a total above a threshold triggers. Validation: Singh 2012 in 676 consecutive obstetric admissions — sensitivity 89% (95% CI 81–95%), specificity 79% (95% CI 76–82%), PPV 39% (95% CI 32–46%), NPV 98% (95% CI 96–99%). Strength is sensitivity (high NPV); weakness is the false-positive burden (low PPV).[1]
- Single-parameter triggering (MEWT): one abnormal value (sustained) triggers, no summation. Validation: Shields 2016, which showed MEWT implementation across six hospitals reduced maternal morbidity, and Hedriana 2016, in which two or more persistent triggers for 30 minutes carried OR 61.7 (95% CI 13.2–288.0) for ICU admission.[3][4]
- Cross-cutting principle 1: the chart must use pregnancy-specific thresholds — a HR of 95, a BP of 95/55 and a RR of 20 are normal late in pregnancy; the chart flags deviation from the pregnant baseline, not from the non-pregnant baseline.
- Cross-cutting principle 2: the chart is only useful paired with an escalation pathway. A documented trigger that is not acted on is the commonest failure mode in maternal mortality enquiries. Audit the chain (trigger → clinician → response → outcome), not the chart alone.[5]
(d) Escalation pathway and disposition (3 marks)
One mark per tier named, with the disposition decision. [5][6]
- Tier 1: bedside review by the registrar within 10 minutes (already done); recheck the obs, send the focused investigations, document a working diagnosis and a time to re-review.[5]
- Tier 2: senior obstetric and anaesthetic review within 30 minutes — this patient has a persistent multi-parameter trigger with fever; sepsis bundle activated: cultures, broad-spectrum antibiotics within the hour, balanced crystalloid, source control planning.[5][6]
- Tier 3: transfer to HDU for ongoing single-organ support (intravenous antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, close nursing, magnesium if eclampsia develops); transfer to ICU if multi-organ failure evolves (ventilation, vasopressors, renal replacement therapy).[6]
Disposition decision: this woman meets the criteria for HDU admission now — persistent multi-parameter trigger, fever, evolving sepsis, post-operative. Document the time of transfer, the team, and the safety-net for deterioration en route.[5]
You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship atlas.
References6Show ledgerHide ledger
- [1]Singh S, McGlennan A, England A, Simons R A validation study of the CEMACH recommended modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) Anaesthesia, 2012.PMID 22066604
- [2]Edwards SE, Grobman WA, Lappen JR, Winter C, Fox R, Lenguerrand E, Draycott T Modified obstetric early warning scoring systems (MOEWS): validating the diagnostic performance for severe sepsis in women with chorioamnionitis Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015.PMID 25446705
- [3]Shields LE, Wiesner S, Klein C, Pelletreau B, Hedriana HL Use of Maternal Early Warning Trigger tool reduces maternal morbidity Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016.PMID 26924745
- [4]Hedriana HL, Wiesner S, Downs BG, Pelletreau B, Shields LE Baseline assessment of a hospital-specific early warning trigger system for reducing maternal morbidity Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2016.PMID 26797195
- [5]Friedman AM, Campbell ML, Kline CR, Wiesner S, D'Alton M, Shields LE Implementing Obstetric Early Warning Systems AJP Rep, 2018.PMID 29686937
- [6]Chu J, Johnston TA, Geoghegan J Maternal Collapse in Pregnancy and the Puerperium: Green-top Guideline No. 56 BJOG, 2020.PMID 31845507