O&G SAQs · Intrapartum care — analgesia and anaesthesia
Obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia: epidural evidence counselling, spinal technique with hypotension prevention (phenylephrine consensus), post-dural puncture headache and blood patch, and the OAA-DAS failed-intubation drill. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
Prompt
You are the registrar on labour ward. A nulliparous woman at 5 cm dilatation requests effective pain relief. She has heard that epidurals increase the chance of caesarean and is considering remifentanil instead. (a) Counsel her on the evidence comparing epidural with non-epidural analgesia, naming the key findings. (4 marks) (b) Describe how you would perform spinal anaesthesia for a caesarean, including the drug, the dose, the block target, and how you prevent hypotension. (5 marks) (c) Two days later a woman on the postnatal ward who had an accidental dural puncture during epidural insertion has a severe postural headache. Outline your assessment and management. (3 marks) (d) A category 1 caesarean is underway under general anaesthesia and intubation fails. Outline the OAA-DAS failed-intubation response and the wake-or-proceed decision. (3 marks)
How this SAQ is marked
Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from specifics: named trial, result number, dose, block level, algorithm step. Write in short labelled points, not prose paragraphs. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Epidural evidence counselling (4 marks)
One mark per named finding, maximum four. [1]
- Efficacy: epidural provides better pain relief and higher maternal satisfaction than non-epidural methods (Cochrane review, Anim-Somuah 2018).[1]
- Caesarean: it does not increase the rate of caesarean section — this directly corrects her concern.[1]
- Instrumental birth: there is an overall increase in assisted vaginal birth, though modern low-dose techniques reduce it: COMET showed normal vaginal birth rose from 35.1% to about 43% with low-dose mobile techniques.[2]
- Long-term: no long-term backache; common short-term effects are hypotension, itch and accidental dural puncture.[1]
(b) Spinal anaesthesia technique (5 marks)
- Drug and dose (1 mark): hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%, typically 12.5 to 15 mg intrathecally, with an intrathecal opioid (fentanyl or diamorphine) for postoperative analgesia.[11][13]
- Block target (1 mark): test to a bilateral sensory level of T4 (cold or pinprick) and document the motor block before the incision.[6]
- Hypotension prevention (2 marks): prophylactic phenylephrine infusion started at intrathecal injection, left uterine displacement, and co-loading with crystalloid — the international consensus preference because phenylephrine produces less fetal acidosis than ephedrine (bolus ephedrine 6 to 12 mg is second-line).[6]
- Aseptic technique and positioning (1 mark): full sterility, midline approach, sitting or lateral, with monitoring and IV access established beforehand.[1]
(c) Post-dural puncture headache (3 marks)
- Assess for postural character and red flags (1 mark): confirm the headache is worse sitting and better lying flat; exclude fever, focal neurology, seizure, altered consciousness or loss of the postural component — any of which demand imaging for alternative diagnoses.[10]
- Supportive measures (1 mark): reassurance, postural advice (lie flat for comfort), hydration, regular analgesia (paracetamol, NSAID), caffeine; avoid straining.[10]
- Epidural blood patch (1 mark): if severe or persisting beyond 24 to 48 hours, inject 20 to 30 mL of the woman's own venous blood into the epidural space at or one space below the puncture; a first patch relieves the majority of cases, a second may be needed for recurrence.[10]
(d) Failed intubation response (3 marks)
- Plan A (1 mark): optimised laryngoscopy with a maximum of two attempts, calling for senior help early.[5]
- Plans B and C (1 mark): Plan B — supraglottic airway (up to two attempts); Plan C — face-mask ventilation with or without cricoid pressure.[5]
- The wake-or-proceed decision and Plan D (1 mark): if oxygenation is maintained and the fetus is not in extremis, wake the woman and return with a regional technique; if the fetus is dying and the airway is lost, proceed with a supraglottic airway; Plan D — front-of-neck access (scalpel-bougie cricothyroidotomy) if oxygenation cannot be maintained. State the factors: maternal condition, fetal condition, anaesthetist skill, obesity, surgical urgency, airway soiling.[5]
References10ShowHide
- [1]Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, et al. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018.PMID 29781504
- [2]Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2001.PMID 11454372
- [3]Wilson MJA, MacArthur C, Hewitt CA, et al. Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour (RESPITE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2018.PMID 30115484
- [5]Mushambi MC, Kinsella SM, Popat M, et al. Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics Anaesthesia, 2015.PMID 26449292
- [6]Kinsella SM, Carvalho B, Dyer RA, et al. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia Anaesthesia, 2018.PMID 29090733
- [7]Pandit JJ, Andrade J, Bogod DG, et al. 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors Br J Anaesth, 2014.PMID 25204697
- [9]Van de Velde M, Carvalho B Remifentanil for labor analgesia: an evidence-based narrative review Int J Obstet Anesth, 2016.PMID 26777438
- [10]Heesen M, Klöhr S, Rossaint R, et al. Insertion of an intrathecal catheter following accidental dural puncture: a meta-analysis Int J Obstet Anesth, 2013.PMID 23219220
- [11]Sng BL, Han NLR, Leong WL, et al. Hyperbaric vs. isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: a Cochrane systematic review Anaesthesia, 2018.PMID 29044483
- [13]Tubog TD, Ramsey VL, Filler L Minimum Effective Dose (ED50 and ED95) of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review AANA J, 2018.PMID 31584404