Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM TopicsTeaching, supervision and feedback

EM · Teaching, supervision and feedback

Teaching, supervision and feedback in the emergency department

Also known as Bedside teaching · One-minute preceptor · Microskills model of teaching · SNAPPS · Peyton four-stage approach · Pendleton’s rules · R2C2 feedback model · Feedback sandwich · Workplace-based assessment · Mini-CEX · DOPS · Case-based discussion · Entrustable professional activities · Graded supervision · Direct observation

Teaching, supervision and feedback in the emergency department — the clinical teacher’s core toolkit and the Fellowship Scholar domain. Bedside teaching models: the one-minute preceptor and Neher’s five microskills (get a commitment, probe the evidence, teach a general rule, reinforce what was right, correct errors), SNAPPS (Summarise, Narrow the differential, Analyse, Probe, Plan, Select — Wolpaw), and Peyton’s four-stage approach to teaching a practical skill. Feedback: the principles of specific, actionable, timely, behaviour-focused feedback (Ende); Pendleton’s rules; the R2C2 facilitated reflective model (Relationship, Reactions, Content, Coach — Sargeant, Lockyer); the feedback sandwich and why it is deprecated; and the meta-analytic evidence that feedback is among the most powerful influences on performance (Wisniewski, d = 0.48). Supervision: graded autonomy, direct versus indirect observation, and entrustment through entrustable professional activities (ten Cate, Gingerich). Assessment: the workplace-based assessment tools — mini-CEX (Norcini), DOPS, and case-based discussion (Lörwald). The differential of good versus poor teaching, and the pitfalls that erode learning and safety. ACEM-primary, globally tagged.

medium14 referencesUpdated 26 July 202617 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEMFRCPCCCFPEMEBEEM

Red flags

  • The non-specific feedback — 'good job', 'well done' — carries no behaviour-specific information and changes nothing; feedback must be specific, actionable and tied to a behaviour, not a global endorsement
  • The feedback sandwich primes the trainee to dismiss the corrective message as the predictable filling between two positives — it is deprecated; deliver the specific correction directly
  • Over-supervision of a competent trainee frustrates and stalls progression; under-supervision of a novice exposes the patient to harm — the supervision level is matched to competence, not to seniority
  • Direct observation without the feedback conversation that follows it assesses nothing and teaches nothing — observation and feedback are a single unit
  • The absent or hands-off supervisor — 'sink or swim' — is abandonment dressed as autonomy; graded autonomy is graded, and the trainee is never unobserved beyond their entrustment level
On this page

Related topics

  • Team-based care and crisis resource management in the emergency department
  • Breaking bad news and communication in the emergency department — the SPIKES framework
  • Patient disposition and safety-netting in the emergency department
  • Medical error and patient safety in the emergency department
  • Research, evidence-based medicine and biostatistics — appraising and applying evidence at the bedside
  • Procedural sedation in the emergency department
  • The Australasian Triage Scale — categories, validity, reliability and the under-triaged patient
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEMFRCPCCCFPEMEBEEM

Red flags

  • The non-specific feedback — 'good job', 'well done' — carries no behaviour-specific information and changes nothing; feedback must be specific, actionable and tied to a behaviour, not a global endorsement
  • The feedback sandwich primes the trainee to dismiss the corrective message as the predictable filling between two positives — it is deprecated; deliver the specific correction directly
  • Over-supervision of a competent trainee frustrates and stalls progression; under-supervision of a novice exposes the patient to harm — the supervision level is matched to competence, not to seniority
  • Direct observation without the feedback conversation that follows it assesses nothing and teaches nothing — observation and feedback are a single unit
  • The absent or hands-off supervisor — 'sink or swim' — is abandonment dressed as autonomy; graded autonomy is graded, and the trainee is never unobserved beyond their entrustment level
The one-line answer

Teaching, supervision and feedback in the emergency department are four linked activities — and the candidate must separate them because each has its own method. Teaching is the deliberate facilitation of learning at the bedside; supervision is oversight calibrated to competence; feedback is specific information that narrows the gap between present and desired performance (Ende); assessment is the systematic judgement of competence. Hold three bedside models — the one-minute preceptor (Neher’s five microskills), SNAPPS (Wolpaw), and Peyton’s four-stage — deliver feedback that is specific, actionable, timely, behaviour-focused and balanced, calibrate supervision to competence with the five-level entrustment scale, and never separate observation from the feedback conversation that follows it.[1]

Meet the patient — the trainee and the teaching moment

A junior registrar who has just clerked a 55-year-old man with central chest pain presents the case at the bedside. The history is thorough, but the registrar finishes with: "I am not really sure what to do next, what do you think?" You have two minutes to teach.[1]

That single non-answer is moment one-minute preceptor exists for. The unstructured "what do you think, doctor?" exchange teaches nothing because it never exposes the trainee’s reasoning. The microskills convert it into a diagnostic teaching exercise — get the commitment, probe the reasoning, correct the gap — in minutes department allows.[1]

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References14ShowHide
  1. [1]Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N. A five-step microskills model of clinical teaching J Am Board Fam Pract, 1992.PMID 1496899
  2. [2]Wolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK. SNAPPS: a learner-centered model for outpatient education Acad Med, 2003.PMID 14507619
  3. [3]Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education JAMA, 1983.PMID 6876333
  4. [4]Orsini C, Rodrigues V, Tricio J, et al. Common models and approaches for the clinical educator to plan effective feedback encounters J Educ Eval Health Prof, 2022.PMID 36537186
  5. [5]Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, Holmboe E, Silver I, Armson H, Driessen E, MacLeod T, Yen W, Ross K, Power M. Facilitated Reflective Performance Feedback: Developing an Evidence- and Theory-Based Model That Builds Relationship, Explores Reactions and Content, and Coaches for Performance Change (R2C2) Acad Med, 2015.PMID 26200584
  6. [6]Lockyer J, Sargeant J, Zetkulic M, et al. In-the-Moment Feedback and Coaching: Improving R2C2 for a New Context J Grad Med Educ, 2020.PMID 32089791
  7. [7]Lockyer J, Lee-Krueger R, Armson H, et al. Application of the R2C2 Model to In-the-Moment Feedback and Coaching Acad Med, 2023.PMID 37797303
  8. [8]Wisniewski B, Zierer K, Hattie J. The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research Front Psychol, 2019.PMID 32038429
  9. [9]Ten Cate O, Taylor DR. The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE Guide No. 140 Med Teach, 2021.PMID 33167763
  10. [10]Gingerich A, Daniels V, Farrell L, et al. Beyond hands-on and hands-off: supervisory approaches and entrustment on the inpatient ward Med Educ, 2018.PMID 29938831
  11. [11]Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills Ann Intern Med, 2003.PMID 12639081
  12. [12]Lörwald AC, Lahner FM, Greif R, et al. Factors influencing the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS: A qualitative synthesis Med Teach, 2018.PMID 29188739
  13. [13]Miller GE The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med, 1990.PMID 2400509
  14. [14]Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Tips for teaching procedural skills. BMC Med Educ, 2020.PMID 33272273

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousTachyarrhythmias in the emergency departmentTachyarrhythmiasNextTeam-based care and crisis resource management in the emergency departmentTeam-based care and CRM

Related topics

  • Team-based care and crisis resource management in the emergency department
  • Breaking bad news and communication in the emergency department — the SPIKES framework
  • Patient disposition and safety-netting in the emergency department
  • Medical error and patient safety in the emergency department
  • Research, evidence-based medicine and biostatistics — appraising and applying evidence at the bedside
  • Procedural sedation in the emergency department
  • The Australasian Triage Scale — categories, validity, reliability and the under-triaged patient