EM · Teaching, supervision and feedback
Teaching, supervision and feedback in the emergency department
Also known as Bedside teaching · One-minute preceptor · Microskills model of teaching · SNAPPS · Peyton four-stage approach · Pendleton’s rules · R2C2 feedback model · Feedback sandwich · Workplace-based assessment · Mini-CEX · DOPS · Case-based discussion · Entrustable professional activities · Graded supervision · Direct observation
Teaching, supervision and feedback in the emergency department — the clinical teacher’s core toolkit and the Fellowship Scholar domain. Bedside teaching models: the one-minute preceptor and Neher’s five microskills (get a commitment, probe the evidence, teach a general rule, reinforce what was right, correct errors), SNAPPS (Summarise, Narrow the differential, Analyse, Probe, Plan, Select — Wolpaw), and Peyton’s four-stage approach to teaching a practical skill. Feedback: the principles of specific, actionable, timely, behaviour-focused feedback (Ende); Pendleton’s rules; the R2C2 facilitated reflective model (Relationship, Reactions, Content, Coach — Sargeant, Lockyer); the feedback sandwich and why it is deprecated; and the meta-analytic evidence that feedback is among the most powerful influences on performance (Wisniewski, d = 0.48). Supervision: graded autonomy, direct versus indirect observation, and entrustment through entrustable professional activities (ten Cate, Gingerich). Assessment: the workplace-based assessment tools — mini-CEX (Norcini), DOPS, and case-based discussion (Lörwald). The differential of good versus poor teaching, and the pitfalls that erode learning and safety. ACEM-primary, globally tagged.
Practise this topic
On this page
Related topics
- Team-based care and crisis resource management in the emergency department
- Breaking bad news and communication in the emergency department — the SPIKES framework
- Patient disposition and safety-netting in the emergency department
- Medical error and patient safety in the emergency department
- Research, evidence-based medicine and biostatistics — appraising and applying evidence at the bedside
- Procedural sedation in the emergency department
- The Australasian Triage Scale — categories, validity, reliability and the under-triaged patient
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- The non-specific feedback — 'good job', 'well done' — carries no behaviour-specific information and changes nothing; feedback must be specific, actionable and tied to a behaviour, not a global endorsement
- The feedback sandwich primes the trainee to dismiss the corrective message as the predictable filling between two positives — it is deprecated; deliver the specific correction directly
- Over-supervision of a competent trainee frustrates and stalls progression; under-supervision of a novice exposes the patient to harm — the supervision level is matched to competence, not to seniority
- Direct observation without the feedback conversation that follows it assesses nothing and teaches nothing — observation and feedback are a single unit
- The absent or hands-off supervisor — 'sink or swim' — is abandonment dressed as autonomy; graded autonomy is graded, and the trainee is never unobserved beyond their entrustment level
Meet the patient — the trainee and the teaching moment
A junior registrar who has just clerked a 55-year-old man with central chest pain presents the case at the bedside. The history is thorough, but the registrar finishes with: "I am not really sure what to do next, what do you think?" You have two minutes to teach.[1]
That single non-answer is moment one-minute preceptor exists for. The unstructured "what do you think, doctor?" exchange teaches nothing because it never exposes the trainee’s reasoning. The microskills convert it into a diagnostic teaching exercise — get the commitment, probe the reasoning, correct the gap — in minutes department allows.[1]
References14ShowHide
- [1]Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N. A five-step microskills model of clinical teaching J Am Board Fam Pract, 1992.PMID 1496899
- [2]Wolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK. SNAPPS: a learner-centered model for outpatient education Acad Med, 2003.PMID 14507619
- [3]Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education JAMA, 1983.PMID 6876333
- [4]Orsini C, Rodrigues V, Tricio J, et al. Common models and approaches for the clinical educator to plan effective feedback encounters J Educ Eval Health Prof, 2022.PMID 36537186
- [5]Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, Holmboe E, Silver I, Armson H, Driessen E, MacLeod T, Yen W, Ross K, Power M. Facilitated Reflective Performance Feedback: Developing an Evidence- and Theory-Based Model That Builds Relationship, Explores Reactions and Content, and Coaches for Performance Change (R2C2) Acad Med, 2015.PMID 26200584
- [6]Lockyer J, Sargeant J, Zetkulic M, et al. In-the-Moment Feedback and Coaching: Improving R2C2 for a New Context J Grad Med Educ, 2020.PMID 32089791
- [7]Lockyer J, Lee-Krueger R, Armson H, et al. Application of the R2C2 Model to In-the-Moment Feedback and Coaching Acad Med, 2023.PMID 37797303
- [8]Wisniewski B, Zierer K, Hattie J. The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research Front Psychol, 2019.PMID 32038429
- [9]Ten Cate O, Taylor DR. The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE Guide No. 140 Med Teach, 2021.PMID 33167763
- [10]Gingerich A, Daniels V, Farrell L, et al. Beyond hands-on and hands-off: supervisory approaches and entrustment on the inpatient ward Med Educ, 2018.PMID 29938831
- [11]Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills Ann Intern Med, 2003.PMID 12639081
- [12]Lörwald AC, Lahner FM, Greif R, et al. Factors influencing the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS: A qualitative synthesis Med Teach, 2018.PMID 29188739
- [13]Miller GE The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med, 1990.PMID 2400509
- [14]Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Tips for teaching procedural skills. BMC Med Educ, 2020.PMID 33272273