Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Phys Topicsgeneral-medicine

Phys · general-medicine

Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice

Also known as Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice · medical ethics autonomy beneficence non maleficence justice

Consultant-physician depth guide to Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice for FRACP DWE/DCE preparation — presentation, differentials, investigations, management, complications and exam angles.

high9 referencesUpdated 26 July 20266 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 10 MCQs
  • SAQ
  • Viva
  • Case

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • MCQ practice1
  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1
  • Clinical case1

Target exams

FRACP DWEFRACP DCEMRCP Part 2ABIM Internal Medicine

Red flags

  • Missed urgency or delayed escalation in Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice turns a salvageable presentation into preventable harm
  • Treating the label without confirming the mechanism leads to wrong therapy in Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice
  • Ignoring multimorbidity and drug interactions while managing Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice is a classic exam and clinical trap
  • Failing to document the shared plan and safety-net advice after Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice loses follow-through
  • Using recalled thresholds without a cited source is forbidden — verify before acting
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • MCQ practice1
  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1
  • Clinical case1

Target exams

FRACP DWEFRACP DCEMRCP Part 2ABIM Internal Medicine

Red flags

  • Missed urgency or delayed escalation in Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice turns a salvageable presentation into preventable harm
  • Treating the label without confirming the mechanism leads to wrong therapy in Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice
  • Ignoring multimorbidity and drug interactions while managing Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice is a classic exam and clinical trap
  • Failing to document the shared plan and safety-net advice after Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice loses follow-through
  • Using recalled thresholds without a cited source is forbidden — verify before acting
The one-line answer

Medical ethics at the bedside rests on four prima facie principles — autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice — worked out through the legal machinery of capacity, consent, confidentiality and duty of care.[4] The skill examiners reward is not reciting the principles but defending a decision: assess capacity with the four-domain test, secure valid consent on its three pillars, respect confidentiality within its named exceptions, and resolve the hard cases with the four-box method.[3][5]

Meet the patient

A 58-year-old man with a bleeding duodenal ulcer, a haemoglobin of 45 g per litre, and a deep faith — he is a Jehovah's Witness and refuses all major blood products. Without transfusion he will probably die tonight. The registrar wants to override him "in his best interests."[2]

Your move in the next ten minutes decides whether you commit an assault or honour a death. The stem tests all four principles at once, and the first question is always the same — does he have capacity for this decision?[5]

Physician Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Physician Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References9ShowHide
  1. [1]Shetty N Medical Ethics and Law Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023.PMID 37881274
  2. [2]Druml C, Ballmer PE, Druml W et al. ESPEN guideline on ethical aspects of artificial nutrition and hydration Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2016.PMID 26923519
  3. [3]Iyalomhe GB Medical ethics and ethical dilemmas Nigerian journal of medicine : journal of the National Association of Resident Doctors of Nigeria, 2009.PMID 19485140
  4. [4]Beauchamp TL Methods and principles in biomedical ethics Journal of medical ethics, 2003.PMID 14519835
  5. [5]Dowie I Important legal principles of consent and mental capacity British journal of community nursing, 2024.PMID 38963268
  6. [6]Roberts LW Informed consent and the capacity for voluntarism The American journal of psychiatry, 2002.PMID 11986120
  7. [7]Lara MC, de la Fuente JR On informed consent Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization, 1990.PMID 2073557
  8. [8]Young GB Ethics Bailliere's clinical neurology, 1996.PMID 9117081
  9. [9]Mbonde A, Young MJ, Dmytriw AA et al. Informed consent practices for acute stroke therapy: principles, challenges and emerging opportunities Journal of neurology, 2024.PMID 37815578

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 10 MCQs
  • SAQ
  • Viva
  • Case
Physician Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Physician Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousMedical Errors and Open Disclosuregeneral-medicineNextMedical Ethics, Capacity and Consentgeneral-medicine