Phys Vivas · general-medicine
Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice — Viva Defence
DCE viva defence for Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice Viva
Long Case Viva Defence
Opening statement
"This patient presents with a problem best framed as Medical Ethics Autonomy Beneficence NON Maleficence Justice. My priorities are to identify red flags, confirm the mechanism with purposeful investigations, start a sequenced management plan, and integrate multimorbidity and follow-up." [1] [2]
Examiner questions
Q1: "What makes this urgent?" [1]
"I look for threats to airway, perfusion, neurology, metabolism, infection or bleeding, and I escalate those before elective work-up." [1] [2]
Q2: "What is your first investigation package?" [2]
"I order tests that change management now, not a scattergun panel." [1] [2]
Q3: "Walk me through treatment." [1]
"Stabilise, treat the mechanism, prevent complications, and plan monitoring." [1] [2] [3]
Q4: "What is the classic trap?" [2]
"Treating a label without confirming the discriminating mechanism, or delaying escalation." [1] [2]
References3ShowHide
- [1]Beauchamp TL Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics, 2003.PMID 14519835
- [2]Iyalomhe GB Medical ethics and ethical dilemmas. Niger J Med, 2009.PMID 19485140
- [3]Shetty N Medical Ethics and Law. Indian J Orthop, 2023.PMID 37881274