Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Vivasinvestigations-procedures-and-technology

Paeds Vivas · investigations-procedures-and-technology

Nasogastric tube insertion and verification — branching viva

Branching viva on nasogastric tube insertion and verification in children: the pH verification rule at 5.5 or less, the rejection of the deprecated whoosh and bubbling tests, the age-adapted tube size and technique, the choice of an orogastric route in the neonate and after facial injury, and the immediate management of a misplaced tube, a traumatic neonatal perforation, and a Never Event.

branching clinical structured oral4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A ward nurse asks whether a feed can be given after a whoosh test. The examiner asks you to state the correct verification method and threshold, why the whoosh test is unsafe, and how you would teach the team — then branches to a preterm neonate who deteriorates after a difficult insertion, forcing the recognition and management of a traumatic perforation, and finally to an intubated infant with no aspirate, where you must defend the move to radiographic confirmation rather than feeding on the external length.

Opening — can we feed after a whoosh test?

Examiner: A ward nurse has just confirmed a child's nasogastric tube with the whoosh test and asks whether the feed can go down. What is the correct verification method, what is the threshold, and why is the whoosh test unsafe? [1] [3]

Candidate (model): The correct bedside verification is aspirate pH measured with a CE-marked indicator strip, and the threshold is 5.5 or less: a reading at or below 5.5 confirms gastric placement and is the green light to feed. The physiological basis is that gastric contents are acidic, typically pH 1 to 5.5, because parietal cells secrete hydrochloric acid, while respiratory secretions and small-intestinal contents have a pH of 6 or more; the strip separates the stomach from the airway, which is the distinction that stops a feed entering the lung. The whoosh test is unsafe because the sound of insufflated air transmits across the chest whether the tube is in the stomach or the bronchus, so it cannot reliably separate the two. It was retired for that reason, and using it as the sole check is itself part of the Never Event. So the feed must not go down; the nurse aspirates and tests the pH, and feeds only at 5.5 or less, or escalates to a radiograph. [3] [4]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Irving SY, Rempel G, Lyman B Pediatric Nasogastric Tube Placement and Verification: Best Practice Recommendations From the NOVEL Project. Nutr Clin Pract, 2018.PMID 30187517
  2. [3]Kisting MA, Korcal L, Schutte DL Lose the Whoosh: An Evidence-Based Project to Improve NG Tube Placement Verification in Infants and Children in the Hospital Setting. J Pediatr Nurs, 2019.PMID 30798144
  3. [4]Metheny NA, Krieger MM, Healey F A review of guidelines to distinguish between gastric and pulmonary placement of nasogastric tubes. Heart Lung, 2019.PMID 30665700
  4. [6]Metheny NA, Stewart BJ, Smith L pH and concentration of bilirubin in feeding tube aspirates as predictors of tube placement. Nurs Res, 1999.PMID 10414681
  5. [9]Taylor SJ Feeding tube safety: National guidance ignores the 'elephant in the room'. Int J Risk Saf Med, 2025.PMID 39973429
  6. [11]Knight RB, Webb DE, P Coppola C Pharyngeal perforation masquerading as esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg, 2009.PMID 19944236
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousMedical devices, digital health and remote monitoring — vivainvestigations-procedures-and-technologyNextNeuroimaging selection and radiation-aware practice — branching vivainvestigations-procedures-and-technology