Paeds SAQs · professional-practice-and-evidence
Paediatric consultation with child, young person and family — formative SAQs
Formative SAQs on the triadic paediatric consultation: Calgary-Cambridge structure, the age-adapted encounter, adolescent confidentiality and HEEADSSS, breaking bad news and safety-netting.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 (10 marks)
A 14-year-old girl attends with her mother for recurrent abdominal pain. The mother does most of the talking; the girl answers in single words and glances at the floor. The referral mentions school absence. There is no acute medical emergency. [1]
- Describe how you would structure this consultation using an adapted Calgary-Cambridge framework, and name the single most important step that is currently missing. (4) [2]
- Outline how you would conduct the adolescent component of the encounter, including confidentiality and the psychosocial screen. (3) [4] [5]
- Give a defensible safety-netting and closure plan for a child sent home from this consultation. (3) [1]
Model answer
Structure the encounter through Calgary-Cambridge: initiate by greeting both and setting the scene; gather information by observing the young person and eliciting her own account then the parental ideas, concerns and expectations; examine while engaging her; explain and plan in plain language with teach-back; and close with an explicit safety-net. The most important missing step is offering the adolescent time alone after a confidentiality framing — without it the school-absence driver will stay hidden. [2] [1]
For the adolescent component, state that the conversation is confidential and explain its limits (risk to self or others, abuse), then see the young person alone and run a HEEADSSS screen covering home, education, eating, activities, drugs, sexuality, suicide and depression, and safety. This surfaces school, mood and risk data a parent-present history will not. [4] [5]
Closure safety-net: document the specific warning signs to watch for (worsening pain, red flags, worsening mood or self-harm), the timeframe, and exactly where and when to return, then confirm understanding with teach-back and arrange named follow-up. [1]
References5ShowHide
- [1]Levetown M and American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics Communicating with children and families: from everyday interactions to skill in conveying distressing information. Pediatrics, 2008.PMID 18450887
- [2]Howells RJ, Davies HA, Silverman JD, Archer JC, Mellon AF Assessment of doctors' consultation skills in the paediatric setting: the Paediatric Consultation Assessment Tool. Archives of disease in childhood, 2010.PMID 19019880
- [3]Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. The oncologist, 2000.PMID 10964998
- [4]Ho J, Fong CK, Iskander A, Towns S, Steinbeck K Digital psychosocial assessment: An efficient and effective screening tool. Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2020.PMID 31883286
- [5]Ford CA, Skiles MP, English A, Cai J, Agans RP, Stokley S, Markowitz L, Koumans EH Minor consent and delivery of adolescent vaccines. The Journal of adolescent health, 2014.PMID 24074605