Paeds SAQs · professional-practice-and-evidence
Open disclosure and duty of candour — formative SAQs
Formative SAQs on staged open disclosure, duty of candour, apology and the second victim after a patient safety incident in paediatrics.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 (10 marks)
A 3-year-old on the ward is given ten times the intended dose of an opioid because of a decimal-point error. The nurse realises within minutes; the child is reviewed, given naloxone as required, and is now stable. Both parents are at the bedside and have limited English. [1]
- Outline the staged process of open disclosure you would lead for this family. (5) [1] [4]
- Describe how you would handle the apology, and address a concern that it might be taken as an admission of legal liability. (3) [1] [2]
- Describe the follow-up you would arrange for the family and for the clinician involved. (2) [4] [14]
Model answer
Stabilise and treat the child first. Then lead the staged process: confirm the facts and the right people (treating clinician/consultant, nurse, interpreter, social worker); hold an initial disclosure in a private space — acknowledge what happened in plain language, give the known facts, say honestly what is not yet known, apologise, and describe the next steps, checking understanding and inviting questions; arrange a trained interpreter and never use the child; name a single point of contact; then hold a follow-up disclosure to share the investigation findings, system causes and improvement plan; document who was present, what was said, the apology and the agreed plan. [1] [4]
Offer a sincere expression of regret for the harm — saying sorry is owed as honesty and compassion. In ANZ and many jurisdictions, apology legislation protects a sincere expression of regret from being treated as an admission of legal liability, and the evidence associates disclosure with apology with reduced, not increased, litigation, so withholding sorry for fear of law misreads both the ethics and the data. [1] [2]
For the family: a written summary, a named contact, a scheduled follow-up meeting to share the review findings and the improvement plan, and counselling if needed. For the clinician (a second victim): arrange peer support, a debrief, and clinical cover so they can step back, protecting their return to safe practice. [4] [14]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Iedema RA The National Open Disclosure Pilot: evaluation of a policy implementation initiative. The Medical journal of Australia, 2008.PMID 18393742
- [2]Iedema R Patients' and family members' experiences of open disclosure following adverse events. International journal for quality in health care, 2008.PMID 18801752
- [4]Jacob H Openness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour (GMC guideline). Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition, 2016.PMID 27002114
- [5]Inkster T Duty of candour and communication during an infection control incident in a paediatric ward of a Scottish hospital. Journal of medical ethics, 2022.PMID 33593873
- [10]Iedema R Practising Open Disclosure: clinical incident communication and systems improvement. Sociology of health & illness, 2009.PMID 18983420
- [14]New L Second-Victim Phenomenon. Nursing clinics of North America, 2024.PMID 38272580