Paeds SAQs · clinical-assessment-and-reasoning
Illness severity, deterioration and track-and-trigger systems — formative SAQs
Two formative short-answer questions on paediatric PEWS interpretation, escalation, EPOCH evidence, caregiver concern and rapid-response system design. Marks and timing support self-assessment; they are not an official board format.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — Overnight PEWS rise with incomplete chart (20 marks, ~15 minutes)
A 4-year-old is on the general paediatric ward with viral wheeze on night two. At 02:10 the nurse shows you a rising multi-parameter PEWS. Oxygen requirement has increased. Blood pressure and capillary refill have not been recorded for 6 hours. The mother says, “She is not herself.” The numerical band is still below the hospital’s automatic MET threshold. [1] [2]
Questions
- Distinguish illness severity, physiological instability, risk of deterioration and failure-to-rescue in this vignette. (4 marks) [1] [2]
- List the seven BedsidePEWS items and the score range 0–26. State what you must not invent at the bedside. (4 marks) [1] [2]
- Outline your immediate bedside actions, including how incomplete observations and caregiver concern change escalation. (6 marks) [1] [2]
- Give a structured MET/senior activation handover in ISBAR form. (3 marks)
- Name two evidence-based reasons cardiac arrest is a poor sole quality metric here. (3 marks)
Model answer
1. Four axes (4)
- Severity: how ill she looks/feels now (effort, oxygen need, interaction). [1] [2]
- Instability: whether airway/breathing/circulation/consciousness are failing this minute. [1] [2]
- Risk of deterioration: trajectory overnight if support is delayed. [1] [2]
- Failure-to-rescue: system risk if incomplete chart and concern are not acted on. [4] [12]
2. BedsidePEWS (4)
Heart rate; systolic blood pressure; capillary refill; respiratory rate; respiratory effort; SpO2; oxygen therapy; total 0–26. Do not invent local age-band numeric cut-offs or colour thresholds from memory — use the hospital chart. [1] [2]
3. Immediate actions (6) [1] [2]
- Go to the bedside; call for help early; ABCDE while reviewing trend. [1] [2]
- Complete missing BP/CRT if safe; do not wait for a perfect score. [1] [2]
- Treat reversible threats (oxygen delivery, work of breathing, fatigue, glucose if indicated). [1] [2]
- Escalate on concern and trajectory, not only on automatic band — caregiver concern is an independent risk signal. [1] [2]
- Increase observation frequency / senior review / MET per local hybrid rules and clinical judgement. [9] [4]
4. ISBAR (3)
Identity/baseline; Situation (time, rising PEWS, incomplete items, maternal concern); Background (wheeze day 2); Assessment (respiratory threat, possible exhaustion); Recommendation (MET attendance, continuous monitoring, possible HDU). [17]
5. Metrics (3)
Ward arrest/death are rare; Bonafide supports critical deterioration as a proximate outcome; EPOCH used significant clinical deterioration events as a secondary outcome when mortality was unchanged. [3] [12]
References10ShowHide
- [1]Parshuram CS, Hutchison J, Middaugh K Development and initial validation of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System score. Critical care (London, England), 2009.PMID 19678924
- [2]Parshuram CS, Duncan HP, Joffe AR, et al. Multicentre validation of the bedside paediatric early warning system score: a severity of illness score to detect evolving critical illness in hospitalised children. Critical care (London, England), 2011.PMID 21812993
- [3]Parshuram CS, Dryden-Palmer K, Farrell C, et al. Effect of a Pediatric Early Warning System on All-Cause Mortality in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: The EPOCH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2018.PMID 29486493
- [4]Trubey R, Huang C, Lugg-Widger FV, et al. Validity and effectiveness of paediatric early warning systems and track and trigger tools for identifying and reducing clinical deterioration in hospitalised children: a systematic review. BMJ open, 2019.PMID 31061010
- [5]Chapman SM, Wray J, Oulton K, et al. 'The Score Matters': wide variations in predictive performance of 18 paediatric track and trigger systems. Archives of disease in childhood, 2017.PMID 28292743
- [9]Mills E, Lin P, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, et al. Association between caregiver concern for clinical deterioration and critical illness in children presenting to hospital: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2025.PMID 40451224
- [12]Bonafide CP, Localio AR, Roberts KE, et al. Impact of rapid response system implementation on critical deterioration events in children. JAMA pediatrics, 2014.PMID 24217295
- [13]Devita MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, et al. Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams. Critical care medicine, 2006.PMID 16878033
- [16]Kuo DZ, Houtrow AJ Recognition and Management of Medical Complexity. Pediatrics, 2016.PMID 27940731
- [17]Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R, et al. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. The New England journal of medicine, 2014.PMID 25372088