Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds SAQsgrowth-development-and-behaviour

Paeds SAQs · growth-development-and-behaviour

General movements and HINE — formative SAQs

Formative SAQs on GMs windows, HINE optimality and combined early CP detection.

20 marks30 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsMRCPCH ClinicalABP General Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsMRCPCH ClinicalABP General Pediatrics
Prompt
General movements assessment and HINE

SAQ 1 (10 marks)

An ex-26-week infant is reviewed at 13 weeks post-term age. A trained assessor reports absent fidgety movements on video. HINE optimality is low. Prior MRI showed bilateral white-matter injury. Parents ask what these tools mean. [1] [5]

  1. Define general movements assessment and name the two main age periods used in clinical teaching. (3) [4] [5]
  2. Explain how HINE differs from GMs and what an optimality concept means. (3) [6] [7] [8]
  3. Outline how you combine these findings with imaging to counsel and act today. (4) [1] [3] [10]

Model answer — SAQ 1

GMs and periods (3): Trained qualitative assessment of spontaneous whole-body movement quality (Prechtl method). Writhing period early post-term; fidgety period roughly 9–20 weeks post-term (often discussed around three to five months corrected). Absent fidgety movements are highly concerning when trained. [4] [5]

HINE (3): Structured scored neurological examination (posture, tone, reflexes, movements, cranial nerve items), typically used across early infancy into the second year. Optimality scoring: lower optimality associates with higher risk of adverse motor outcome in context; do not invent uncited universal cut-offs. Complements GMs rather than duplicating video movement quality. [6] [7] [8]

Combine and act (4): Converging abnormal GMs, low HINE and MRI injury support high-probability cerebral palsy language. Start early intervention now, plan serial review, explain that phenotype still refines, avoid waiting for walking age. [1] [3] [10]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References14ShowHide
  1. [1]Novak I Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA pediatrics, 2017.PMID 28715518
  2. [2]Bosanquet M A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2013.PMID 23574478
  3. [3]Morgan C The Pooled Diagnostic Accuracy of Neuroimaging, General Movements, and Neurological Examination for Diagnosing Cerebral Palsy Early in High-Risk Infants: A Case Control Study. Journal of clinical medicine, 2019.PMID 31694305
  4. [4]Prechtl HF State of the art of a new functional assessment of the young nervous system. An early predictor of cerebral palsy. Early human development, 1997.PMID 9467689
  5. [5]Einspieler C Cerebral Palsy: Early Markers of Clinical Phenotype and Functional Outcome. Journal of clinical medicine, 2019.PMID 31590221
  6. [6]Haataja L Optimality score for the neurologic examination of the infant at 12 and 18 months of age. The Journal of pediatrics, 1999.PMID 10431108
  7. [7]Romeo DM Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in infants born at term: Predicting outcomes other than cerebral palsy. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2022.PMID 35201619
  8. [8]Fehlings D The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exam Scoring Aid supports early detection for infants with high probability of cerebral palsy. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2024.PMID 38818710
  9. [9]Romeo DM Neurological assessment tool for screening infants during the first year after birth: The Brief-Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2024.PMID 38287208
  10. [10]Morgan C Early Intervention for Children Aged 0 to 2 Years With or at High Risk of Cerebral Palsy: International Clinical Practice Guideline Based on Systematic Reviews. JAMA pediatrics, 2021.PMID 33999106
  11. [11]Morgan C Effectiveness of motor interventions in infants with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2016.PMID 27027732
  12. [12]Te Velde A Age of Diagnosis, Fidelity and Acceptability of an Early Diagnosis Clinic for Cerebral Palsy: A Single Site Implementation Study. Brain sciences, 2021.PMID 34439692
  13. [14]Einspieler C Are abnormal fidgety movements an early marker for complex minor neurological dysfunction at puberty? Early human development, 2007.PMID 17129688
  14. [16]Kwong AK Early high risk of cerebral palsy classification is predictive of cerebral palsy at 2 years: an implementation cohort study. Archives of disease in childhood, 2025.PMID 40877021
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousFeeding problems, food refusal and selective eating — formative SAQsgrowth-development-and-behaviourNextHearing impairment and development — formative SAQsgrowth-development-and-behaviour