Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds SAQsallergy-and-immunology

Paeds SAQs · allergy-and-immunology

Food allergy diagnosis and oral food challenge — formative SAQs

Formative SAQs on the diagnostic approach to food allergy: structured reaction history, interpretation of SPT and specific IgE thresholds, component-resolved diagnostics, oral food challenge protocol and safety, and the prevention paradigm shift from the LEAP trial.

20 marks30 min4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWEMRCPCH ClinicalABP General Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWEMRCPCH ClinicalABP General Pediatrics
Prompt
Food allergy diagnosis and oral food challenge

SAQ 1: Diagnostic approach to a child with suspected peanut allergy (10 marks, 15 minutes)

Stem: A 14-month-old boy with a history of moderate atopic dermatitis developed perioral urticaria and one episode of vomiting 10 minutes after eating peanut butter for the first time. His mother stopped the exposure; symptoms resolved over 30 minutes without treatment. She asks you to "test him for food allergies." [1]

(a) What six elements of a structured reaction history would you elicit? (3 marks) [1]

  1. What — the specific food and its form (raw, cooked, processed — peanut butter in this case). [1]
  2. How much — estimated dose ingested before symptoms. [1]
  3. When — time from ingestion to symptom onset (10 minutes — consistent with IgE-mediated). [1]
  4. What happened — specific symptoms by organ system (cutaneous: urticaria; GI: vomiting; check for respiratory, cardiovascular involvement). [1]
  5. Reproducibility — has this happened before with the same or related foods? [1]
  6. Cofactors — exercise, NSAID use, intercurrent illness, alcohol (adolescents) that might potentiate reaction. [1]

(b) What is the appropriate diagnostic testing strategy, and what thresholds would guide interpretation? (4 marks) [1]

Perform a skin prick test (SPT) to peanut only — not a broad food allergy panel (broad panels generate false positives in atopic children and cause harm from unnecessary dietary restriction). [1][4] Alternatively or additionally, serum peanut-specific IgE. [2]

SPT 95% positive predictive value (PPV) threshold for peanut in young children: wheal diameter 8 mm or greater — above this, approximately 95% will react on oral food challenge. [1][4] Serum peanut-specific IgE 95% PPV: 14 kU/L or greater in children. [1] A positive test with a convincing history confirms the diagnosis. [1]

If the result is ambiguous (SPT 3-7 mm or sIgE below 14), component-resolved diagnostics for Ara h 2 should be requested — Ara h 2 is the most predictive single component for clinical peanut allergy and can reduce the need for oral food challenge. [4][2]

(c) When would you perform an oral food challenge, and describe the key elements of the protocol? (3 marks) [3]

OFC is indicated when history and test results are discordant or inconclusive, or to assess for resolution of a previously confirmed allergy. [1][3] Contraindicated if uncontrolled asthma or acute illness. [3]

Protocol: escalating doses of challenge food at 15-20 minute intervals to a total serving-equivalent dose (4-8 g protein for peanut); assess for objective symptoms after each dose; stop on any objective reaction or completion of total dose; observe for 1-2 hours after final dose. [3][1]

Safety: performed under medical supervision with IV access (for high-risk), IM adrenaline (0.01 mg/kg of 1:1000 into anterolateral thigh), oxygen, nebulised bronchodilators, and IV fluids immediately available. [3][1] Formats: DBPCFC is gold standard (eliminates bias); open challenge appropriate for routine clinical use when expected reaction is objective. [3]


Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Boyce JA, Assa'ad A, Burks AW, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: report of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2010.PMID 21134576
  2. [2]Sicherer SH, Sampson HA Food allergy: A review and update on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2018.PMID 29157945
  3. [3]Sampson HA, Gerth van Wijk R, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al. Standardizing double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology-European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology PRACTALL consensus report. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2012.PMID 23195525
  4. [4]Foong RX, Dantzer JA, Wood RA, et al. Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Food Allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2021.PMID 33429723
  5. [5]Togias A, Cooper SF, Acebal ML, et al. Addendum guidelines for the prevention of peanut allergy in the United States. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2017.PMID 28065802
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousEgg, wheat, soy, fish and shellfish allergy: SAQallergy-and-immunologyNextFood allergy management and prevention — formative SAQsallergy-and-immunology