Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds SAQsclinical-assessment-and-reasoning

Paeds SAQs · clinical-assessment-and-reasoning

Clinical reasoning, problem representation and differential diagnosis — formative SAQs

Two formative short-answer questions on paediatric problem representation, threat-first differentials, cognitive traps and residual-risk handover.

20 marks30 min2 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWEMRCPCH TheoryMRCPCH ClinicalABP General Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWEMRCPCH TheoryMRCPCH ClinicalABP General Pediatrics
Prompt
Paediatric problem representation and flexible differentials

SAQ 1 — Infant return visit after a viral label (10 marks)

A 7-week-old was discharged yesterday with “likely viral illness.” The caregiver returns overnight saying the baby is more lethargic and “not himself.” First observations are only mildly abnormal. [4] [5]

Questions

  1. Write a one-sentence problem representation for this encounter. (3 marks) [1] [2]
  2. Build a threat-first differential of up to five items and state residual risks that remain open if a viral working diagnosis is still used. (4 marks) [3] [5]
  3. Outline the diagnostic pause and handoff content you would use. (3 marks) [6] [7]

Model answer

Problem representation (3). Previously assessed 7-week-old with overnight return for progressive lethargy and caregiver concern that the infant is not himself after a prior viral label; mild first observations but high residual risk for evolving serious bacterial infection, cardiac or metabolic disease; requires senior review and rewrite of the working diagnosis. Must include age, return context, tempo, caregiver concern and threat posture. [1] [2] [4]

Threat-first differential (4). Immediate threats: serious bacterial infection/sepsis, congenital heart disease with evolving failure, metabolic crisis, evolving respiratory failure, non-accidental injury or other hidden threat as context requires. If a viral working diagnosis remains for action, residual risks must stay explicit: delayed serious infection, cardiac disease, metabolic disease and any safeguarding concern. Prioritise by threat, likelihood, reversibility and harm of delay. [3] [5]

Diagnostic pause and handoff (3). Pause questions: what is the sentence now, what must I not miss, what would change my mind, who else should look. Handover: provisional working diagnosis, residual risks, actions already taken, response, next discriminating step, caregiver concern and review time. Do not hand over “stable viral” alone. [6] [7]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References10ShowHide
  1. [1]Bowen JL Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. The New England journal of medicine, 2006.PMID 17124019
  2. [2]McQuade CN Characteristics differentiating problem representation synthesis between novices and experts. Journal of hospital medicine, 2024.PMID 38528679
  3. [3]Bergl PA Keeping a Flexible Differential Diagnosis: an Exercise in Clinical Reasoning. Journal of general internal medicine, 2019.PMID 30847831
  4. [4]Mills E Association between caregiver concern for clinical deterioration and critical illness in children presenting to hospital: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2025.PMID 40451224
  5. [5]Bordini BJ Overcoming Diagnostic Errors in Medical Practice. The Journal of pediatrics, 2017.PMID 28336147
  6. [6]Starmer AJ Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. The New England journal of medicine, 2014.PMID 25372088
  7. [7]Croskerry P Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing. BMJ quality & safety, 2013.PMID 23882089
  8. [8]Berkwitt A Cognitive bias in inpatient pediatrics. Hospital pediatrics, 2014.PMID 24785565
  9. [9]Kuo DZ Recognition and Management of Medical Complexity. Pediatrics, 2016.PMID 27940731
  10. [10]Custers EJ Thirty years of illness scripts: Theoretical origins and practical applications. Medical teacher, 2015.PMID 25180878
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousCare of children with medical complexity and technology dependence — formative SAQsclinical-assessment-and-reasoningNextContinuity of care and the paediatric medical home — formative SAQsclinical-assessment-and-reasoning