Paeds SAQs · growth-development-and-behaviour
Behavioural management of defiance and oppositional behaviours — formative SAQs
Two formative SAQs on ODD versus CD formulation, coercive cycles, parent training first-line care and limited medication role.
On this page & tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — Formulation and first-line plan (10 marks)
A 7-year-old boy is brought because “he never listens.” For 18 months he has argued daily, lost his temper over small demands, blamed siblings, and been spiteful after consequences. Home and school are both affected. Teachers report incomplete work and frequent talking back, but no stealing, fire-setting or animal cruelty. Mother says time-out “makes it worse” and she often gives up the demand. Father is less involved. The child is otherwise growing well. Hearing screen last year was normal. [4] [9]
Questions
- Distinguish normative noncompliance, an ODD-range pattern and conduct disorder using this stem. (3 marks) [4]
- Explain the coercive family cycle likely operating here and why punishment-only strategies fail. (3 marks) [9]
- Outline a first-line management plan for the next 8 weeks, including school actions and what you would specifically assess for comorbidity. (4 marks) [5] [11] [18]
Model answer
1. Banding (3)
- Not merely normative: duration ~18 months, multi-setting impairment, angry/defiant/vindictive cluster. [4]
- Fits ODD-range pattern rather than isolated toddler limit-testing. [4]
- Not CD on current information: no aggression-to-animals, property destruction, deceit/theft or serious rule-violation criteria described. [4]
2. Coercive cycle (3)
- Demand → child escalates → parent withdraws demand (escape reinforcement for child) or explodes (models aggression). [9]
- Short-term peace is bought; long-term noncompliance strengthens. [9]
- Punishment-only plans without positive engagement and consistent follow-through intensify coercion and do not teach replacement skills. [11]
3. First-line plan (4)
- Behavioural parent training with coached practice (group or individual; Oregon/Incredible Years/PCIT-type components: positive interaction, consistent discipline, practice with child). [5] [11]
- School plan: calm specific commands, contingent praise, planned response to noncompliance, reduce public power struggles; shared goals with teacher. [4]
- Comorbidity screen: ADHD (history + school function), learning/language, sleep, mood/anxiety/trauma. Treat ADHD if present per paediatric ADHD pathway. [18]
- Safety and follow-up metrics: injuries, office referrals, morning routine success, strategy fidelity; step up to specialist care if severe aggression or no functional gain. [4] [5]
You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship atlas.
References7Show ledgerHide ledger
- [4]Steiner H Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with oppositional defiant disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2007.PMID 17195736
- [5]Scott S Multicentre controlled trial of parenting groups for childhood antisocial behaviour in clinical practice. BMJ, 2001.PMID 11473908
- [6]Gorman DA Canadian guidelines on pharmacotherapy for disruptive and aggressive behaviour in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, or conduct disorder. Can J Psychiatry, 2015.PMID 25886657
- [9]Dishion T The Oregon Model of Behavior Family Therapy: From Intervention Design to Promoting Large-Scale System Change. Behav Ther, 2016.PMID 27993335
- [11]Kaminski JW A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 2008.PMID 18205039
- [18]Wolraich ML Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics, 2019.PMID 31570648
- [2]Stringaris A Three dimensions of oppositionality in youth. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2009.PMID 19166573