O&G Vivas · Intrapartum care — obstetric emergencies
Uterine rupture and scar dehiscence — structured oral station (12 minutes)
FRANZCOG oral-format station on uterine rupture during a trial of labour after caesarean: candidate manages from the doorway, defends the fetal heart rate evidence, states the repair-versus-hysterectomy criteria, counsels for a future pregnancy and conducts open disclosure. Scored against the eight published RANZCOG oral domains.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Station format
4 minutes reading, 12 minutes examination, 20 marks, global scoring. The eight published RANZCOG oral domains apply: history and examination; investigations and interpreting results; treatment and management; clinical knowledge; complex, urgent or unusual clinical presentations; rapport with patient, support person or colleague; respect; communication skills. The examiner is watching for the moment you commit to the diagnosis — hesitation is the failure mode. [1][2]
Reveal the examiner script and model responses
Opening prompt — "Tell me what you do from the doorway."
Model response — commit immediately: [1][4]
- "This is a uterine rupture until proven otherwise. Scarred uterus, oxytocin running, new pain through a working epidural, maternal tachycardia and a sustained fetal bradycardia — that is the picture."
- "First action: stop the oxytocin. Then declare the emergency and activate the massive obstetric haemorrhage protocol."
- "Call by name: obstetric consultant, anaesthetist, theatre coordinator, neonatal team, blood bank. Scribe and timekeeper. We are going to theatre now for a laparotomy."
- "Resuscitate on the way: high-flow oxygen, two large-bore cannulae, full blood count, coagulation with fibrinogen, crossmatch four to six units, urea and electrolytes, calcium and lactate, and tranexamic acid 1 g intravenously over 10 minutes."[1][5]
Examiner is listening for: the diagnosis named first, the oxytocin stopped first, and no diagnostic detour before theatre. [4]
Probe 1 — "The anaesthetist wants to top up her epidural for the pain. What do you say?"
- "No. Pain that breaks through a working epidural in a woman with a uterine scar is a red flag, not a top-up indication — it is deep visceral and peritoneal pain that a labour block does not cover."[3]
- "In the Dutch prospective national study, women whose rupture ended badly had more warning symptoms than those who did not: abdominal pain with an odds ratio of 3.34 and cardiotocograph abnormalities with an odds ratio of 9.94, and those signs were most often present 20 to 60 minutes before birth. Masking them is how we lose the hour we still have."[3]
- "I would ask her instead to prepare for a general anaesthetic and a major haemorrhage."[1]
Probe 2 — "You cannot get an ultrasound machine for four minutes. Do you wait?"
- "No. A normal scan never excludes rupture, and the laparotomy is the investigation. I would only use ultrasound if it were already at the bedside and delayed nothing — free intraperitoneal fluid or a fetus outside the cavity would be confirmatory, not permissive."[1]
- "The time argument is decisive: in the Norwegian national cohort of complete ruptures, time to delivery under 20 minutes gave the fewest intrapartum and infant deaths at 9.9%, and over 30 minutes versus under 20 minutes carried an odds ratio of 16.7 for death."[4]
Probe 3 — "At laparotomy the baby is in the abdomen. The defect runs from the old scar out to the left, there is bleeding from the uterine vessels, the loss is well over two litres and the fibrinogen has collapsed. What do you do?"
- "Deliver the baby and hand it over. Control the bleeding edges with clamps or compression, get a second experienced pair of hands scrubbed, and define the defect: size, site and every extension — lateral to the vessels, down to the cervix, forward to the bladder."[1][5]
- "Then I would make the decision out loud with my consultant: this is a hysterectomy. She is unstable, the defect extends laterally into the uterine vessels, and with a fibrinogen of 1.0 g/L further reconstruction will not outrun the coagulopathy."[5][6]
- "Temporising while we prepare: bilateral uterine artery ligation, internal iliac ligation if skilled help is present, pelvic packing, cell salvage. Transfuse to fibrinogen at or above 2 g/L and platelets above 50 x 10 to the 9 per litre, replace calcium, warm her actively."[5]
- "I would check the bladder and the ureters before and after, because a lateral lower-segment extension puts both at risk."[1]
Probe 4 — "When would you have repaired instead?"
- "Stable haemodynamics, a correctable coagulopathy, clean approximable edges confined to the lower segment, no extension into the cervix, broad ligament, uterine vessels or bladder, and a woman who wants future fertility. Then debride, secure the angles first, close in two layers with a delayed-absorbable suture and re-inspect."[1][6]
- "And I would be honest about the comparative evidence: in a nationwide study of 644 ruptures, 44.6% had repair and 55.4% hysterectomy, but the hysterectomy group was older, more comorbid and more often had impaired consciousness — so the outcome difference is confounded by indication, not proof that repair is better."[6]
Probe 5 — "Her uterus was preserved. She asks whether she can have another baby."
- "Yes, and the honest answer depends on where the rupture was. In the largest series of pregnancies after a previous complete rupture — 72 maternities — there were 3 new complete ruptures, 4.2%, and 6 uneventful partial ruptures."[7]
- "All three complete ruptures were preterm and in scars outside the lower segment. The recurrence rate was 0% where the previous rupture had been in the lower segment and 8.6% where it had been outside it. Hers was in the lower segment, which is the more favourable group."[7]
- "The plan is a planned caesarean before labour, in a unit with immediate theatre and blood, with a consultant present and clear instructions to come in early with any pain or bleeding."[1][7]
- "The hardest part is timing. In that series, corrected perinatal mortality was 1.3%, but 36.1% of babies were born before 37 weeks and most of that prematurity was iatrogenic — driven by our anxiety as much as hers. I would name that trade-off explicitly rather than pretend earlier is automatically safer."[7]
Probe 6 — "The partner asks how this was allowed to happen. He was told a VBAC was safe."
This is scored under rapport, respect and communication. Answer him, do not defend yourself. [1][8]
- Sit down, at eye level, and answer the question he actually asked: "The scar in her womb gave way during labour. That is a recognised risk of labouring after a caesarean — it is uncommon, but it is real, and it happened to her."
- Be specific without hiding behind numbers: "For a woman in her situation the risk was in the order of half a percent to one percent, and it is higher when labour is induced or augmented, as hers was. That should have been discussed and I will check what she was told and make sure you both have it in writing."[8]
- "Nothing about the way she was cared for tonight was unusual until she developed pain, and from that point we moved as fast as we can move."
- Commit to formal open disclosure, a written summary and a consultant follow-up appointment, and say when it will happen.[3]
You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship atlas.
References8Show ledgerHide ledger
- [1]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Obstet Gynecol, 2019.PMID 30681543
- [2]Ridgeway JJ, Weyrich DL, Benedetti TJ, et al. Fetal heart rate changes associated with uterine rupture Obstet Gynecol, 2004.PMID 14990414
- [3]Overtoom EM, Huynh TN, Rosman AN, et al. Predicting the risks and recognizing the signs: a two-year prospective population-based study on pregnant women with uterine rupture in The Netherlands J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2024.PMID 38350236
- [4]Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Vangen S, et al. Infant outcome after complete uterine rupture Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018.PMID 29655964
- [5]Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Vangen S, et al. Maternal outcome after complete uterine rupture Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2019.PMID 30762871
- [6]Sugai S, Sasabuchi Y, Yasunaga H, et al. In-hospital outcomes of repair and hysterectomy for uterine rupture: A nationwide observational study Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2024.PMID 39298829
- [7]Al-Zirqi I, Vangen S Pregnancies in Women with a Previous Complete Uterine Rupture Obstet Gynecol Int, 2023.PMID 36819713
- [8]Adily P, Bettison T, Lauer M, et al. Inter-pregnancy interval and uterine rupture during a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births: a retrospective population-based cohort study EClinicalMedicine, 2025.PMID 39902314