O&G Vivas · Gynaecological oncology — gestational trophoblastic disease
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia — structured oral station (12 minutes)
FRANZCOG oral-format station on post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: candidate makes the biochemical diagnosis, stages and scores with the FIGO 2000 system, defends single-agent methotrexate-folinic acid, and counsels on cure and fertility. Scored against the eight published RANZCOG oral domains.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Station format
4 minutes reading, 12 minutes examination, 20 marks, global scoring. The eight published RANZCOG oral domains apply: history and examination; investigations and interpreting results; treatment and management; clinical knowledge; complex, urgent or unusual clinical presentations; rapport; respect; communication skills.[3]
Reveal the examiner script and model responses
Opening prompt — "What is the diagnosis, and what is your first action?"
- "This is post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. The hCG has plateaued across four weekly values, meeting the FIGO plateau criterion for post-molar GTN."
- "My first action is to confirm the hCG is real with a urine test — to exclude a phantom hCG — and to exclude a new pregnancy with ultrasound, since she is on contraception. Then I register her with the regional trophoblast centre and stage and score her."
Probe 1 — "Reproduce the FIGO 2000 anatomic staging."
- "Stage I, disease confined to the uterine corpus; Stage II, disease extending outside the uterus but limited to the genital tract structures; Stage III, disease extending to the lungs with or without genital tract involvement; Stage IV, all other metastatic sites. The stage and the WHO score are written together as a single figure."[1][2]
Probe 2 — "Reproduce the WHO score variables and the cut-off."
- "Eight variables: age; antecedent pregnancy; interval in months from the index pregnancy; pre-treatment serum hCG; largest tumour size including uterus; site of metastases; number of metastases identified; and previous failed chemotherapy. Each is scored 0, 1, 2 or 4."[2][3]
- "A total of 6 or below is low-risk and gets single-agent chemotherapy; 7 or above is high-risk and gets multi-agent EMA-CO. The Charing Cross convention scores 0 to 8 as low-risk."[4]
Probe 3 — "She is FIGO stage I with a WHO score of 3. What treatment do you give, and what do you tell her about the outcome?"
- "Low-risk disease. I give the Charing Cross 8-day methotrexate-folinic acid regimen: methotrexate 50 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 3, 5 and 7, with folinic acid rescue on days 2, 4, 6 and 8, repeated every two weeks until hCG normalises and then for consolidation."[4][5]
- "The McNeish Charing Cross cohort of 485 women reported 100% overall survival with this regimen; about two-thirds normalise on methotrexate alone. Actinomycin-D 1.25 mg per square metre every two weeks is the alternative if methotrexate is resisted or contraindicated."[4][5]
Probe 4 — "She is frightened and asks whether she will die, and whether she can have more children."
Counsel with the numbers — this is a scored domain: [3]
- "This is one of the most curable cancers we treat — overall cure exceeds 95%, and your form is essentially always cured. Treatment preserves fertility, and most women conceive afterwards. I will keep a close eye on your hCG and support you through it."
- Acknowledge her fear, give the numbers plainly, confirm she has understood, and arrange a point of contact.
Probe 5 — "What if her score had been 14, with liver metastases?"
- "High-risk, ultra-high-risk disease. I would not start full-dose EMA-CO directly — I would begin with low-dose induction etoposide 100 mg per square metre and cisplatin 20 mg per square metre on days 1 and 2 weekly, to avoid fatal tumour lysis, then proceed to EMA-CO. The Alifrangis cohort showed induction cut the early-death rate from 7.2% to 0.7%, with 94.3% overall survival in high-risk disease."[6]
You have read the opening of this viva. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship atlas.
References6Show ledgerHide ledger
- [1]FIGO Oncology Committee FIGO staging for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia 2000. FIGO Oncology Committee. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2002.PMID 12065144
- [2]Ngan HY, Bender H, Benedet JL, et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, FIGO 2000 staging and classification. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2003.PMID 14763174
- [3]Soper JT Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Current Evaluation and Management. Obstet Gynecol, 2021.PMID 33416290
- [4]McNeish IA, Strickland S, Holden L, Rustin GJ, Foskett M, Seckl MJ, Newlands ES Low-risk persistent gestational trophoblastic disease: outcome after initial treatment with low-dose methotrexate and folinic acid from 1992 to 2000. J Clin Oncol, 2002.PMID 11919242
- [5]Jiang F, Guan CL, Jiao LZ, Xu T, Wan XR, Shi SS, et al. Efficacy and safety of biweekly single-dose actinomycin D versus multiday methotrexate in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Ann Oncol, 2025.PMID 40543844
- [6]Alifrangis C, Agarwal R, Short D, Fisher RA, Sebire NJ, Harvey R, Savage PM, Seckl MJ EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: good outcomes with induction low-dose etoposide-cisplatin and genetic analysis. J Clin Oncol, 2013.PMID 23233709