O&G SAQs · Postpartum care — perineal health and wound care
Perineal wound complications and breakdown — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on perineal wound complications and breakdown after OASIS repair: the NICE NG194 assessment questions, the rectal examination obligation, theatre versus conservative criteria, the PREVIEW evidence honestly stated, the post-OASIS antibiotic and laxative bundle, and the long-term perineal clinic follow-up. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page & tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from specifics: named trial, named dose, named criterion, explicit follow-up structure. Write in short labelled points, not prose paragraphs. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark scheme
(a) NICE NG194 questions and the essential examination (3 marks)
One mark for the four questions; two for the rectal examination and why. [3]
- The four NICE NG194 perineal questions asked at every postnatal contact: (1) is there pain that is not settling or is getting worse; (2) any offensive discharge or bleeding; (3) any difficulty or pain passing urine or stool; (4) any feeling that something is not right down below.[3]
- The single most important examination is a digital rectal examination. This woman had a 3b OASIS repaired and now has a gaping infected wound — sphincter involvement in the breakdown must be excluded before any decision about conservative versus surgical management. The absence of a documented rectal examination is the commonest medicolegal pitfall in perineal trauma and the breakdown that follows it.[7]
(b) Investigations and the theatre-versus-conservative decision (4 marks)
One mark for investigations; three for the disposition criteria. [3]
[3]Investigations:
- Wound swab for culture and sensitivity.
- Full blood count and C-reactive protein (she is at risk of systemic infection).
- Midstream urine culture if urinary symptoms.
- Observations: temp, HR, BP, RR — and lactate if any systemic upset.
Theatre (immediate) if: necrotising infection suspected (pain out of proportion, dusky or crepitant tissue, systemic toxicity); expanding haematoma with haemodynamic compromise; deep abscess; breakdown involving the sphincter complex; suspected rectovaginal fistula.[3]
Conservative (with daily review) if: the woman is systemically well; the wound is superficial or limited to skin and subcutaneous tissue; the sphincter is intact on rectal examination; the wound base is sloughy or purulent but not necrotic. Conservative package: wound hygiene, broad-spectrum antibiotics guided by swab (amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg PO bd plus metronidazole 400 mg PO tds), scheduled analgesia (paracetamol 1 g qid, diclofenac 50 mg tds, tramadol 50 mg every 4 h prn; avoid codeine in breastfeeding), and lactulose plus senna.[3]
(c) PREVIEW honestly stated (4 marks)
Two marks for the 2-week and 6-to-8-week outcomes; one for the design limitations; one for the counselling message. [1]
- PREVIEW (Dudley and colleagues, BMJ Open 2017) was a multicentre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial in the UK.
- 34 women randomised (17 in each arm) — small by design.
- Wound healing at 2 weeks favoured resuturing (OR 20.00, 95 percent CI 2.04 to 196.37, p=0.004).
- By 6 to 8 weeks, all but one wound in both groups had healed.
- Women reported higher satisfaction with resuturing at 3 months.
- Design limitations: strong patient and clinician preference limited recruitment; the trial was a feasibility study, not a definitive trial; no definitive large randomised trial has been completed; the Cochrane review of 2013 (Dudley) found insufficient evidence to recommend one approach over the other.[2]
- Counselling message: resuture heals faster at 2 weeks and may be preferred by women, but almost every wound heals by 6 to 8 weeks either way. Choose resuture for a clean, granulating, deep or OASIS-involving breakdown; never resuture a sloughy or infected wound.
(d) The post-OASIS bundle (2 marks)
One mark for what was given (and the rationale); one for what should be added now. [8]
- At repair (Green-top 29): broad-spectrum antibiotics (a single IV dose at repair, continued orally — amoxicillin-clavulanate plus metronidazole is standard); a laxative (lactulose 15 to 30 mL bd) without a routine bulking agent (Eogan RCT showed bulking agents add bloating without benefit); structured pelvic-floor physiotherapy; and a documented plan for perineal clinic follow-up.[8][9]
- What should be added now: a wound swab and broad-spectrum antibiotic cover guided by the result; an escalation of analgesia if her current regimen is insufficient; and a same-day specialist review per NICE NG194 — perineal wound breakdown is a same-day referral, not a next-clinic problem.[3]
(e) Follow-up over the next 12 months (2 marks)
One mark for the perineal clinic structure; one for the mode-of-birth counselling. [4][7]
- Perineal clinic at 6 weeks with a structured review of pain, continence (flatus and faecal), sexual function, and wound healing.
- Endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry at 6 months to assess sphincter integrity and inform future mode of birth.
- Pelvic-floor physiotherapy throughout, with scar mobilisation and a structured return to sexual function.
- Sexual function counselling — dyspareunia is common at 3 months and persists in a minority at 12 months; lubricants, scar mobilisation, and referral to a sexual function clinic if persistent.
- Mode of birth next pregnancy — individualised conversation informed by her symptoms, the endoanal ultrasound findings, and her preferences; the Carter and Mørch systematic reviews inform the caesarean-versus-vaginal discussion.[4]
- Approximately 60 to 80 percent of women are asymptomatic at 12 months after primary OASIS repair — quote the number and address the remainder.[4]
You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship atlas.
References9Show ledgerHide ledger
- [1]Dudley L, Kettle C, Thomas PW, Ismail KM Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial BMJ Open, 2017.PMID 28188151
- [2]Dudley LM, Kettle C, Ismail KM Secondary suturing compared to non-suturing for broken down perineal wounds following childbirth Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013.PMID 24065561
- [3]Gommesen D, Nohr EA, Drue HC, et al. Obstetric perineal tears: risk factors, wound infection and dehiscence: a prospective cohort study Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019.PMID 31004221
- [4]Okeahialam NA, Wong KW, Thakar R, Sultan AH The incidence of wound complications following primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022.PMID 35550375
- [5]Duggal N, Mercado C, Daniels K, Bujor A, Caughey AB, El-Sayed YY Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of postpartum perineal wound complications: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol, 2008.PMID 18515507
- [6]Buppasiri P, Lumbiganon P, Thinkhamrop J, Thinkhamrop B Antibiotic prophylaxis for third- and fourth-degree perineal tear during vaginal birth Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014.PMID 25289960
- [7]Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Kettle C, Radley S, Jones P, O'Brien PM Repair techniques for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol, 2006.PMID 16738150
- [8]Roper JC, Amber N, Wan OYK, Thakar R, Sultan AH Review of available national guidelines for obstetric anal sphincter injury Int Urogynecol J, 2020.PMID 32789813
- [9]Eogan M, Daly L, Behan M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C Randomised clinical trial of a laxative alone versus a laxative and a bulking agent after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury BJOG, 2007.PMID 17516966