O&G SAQs · Gynaecological oncology — gestational trophoblastic disease
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: the FIGO hCG criteria, the FIGO 2000 anatomic staging reproduced verbatim, the WHO eight-variable prognostic score with the low-risk versus high-risk cut-off and the Charing Cross 0 to 8 convention, and the methotrexate-folinic acid regimen with the McNeish outcome. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page & tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Marks come from verbatim reproduction and specifics: the FIGO hCG criteria, the anatomic stages word-for-word, the eight WHO score variables named, the score cut-off, and the chemotherapy regimen with its schedule. Write in short labelled points.[1][3]
Reveal model answer and mark scheme
(a) Diagnosis and immediate next steps (3 marks)
One mark for the diagnosis, two for the criteria and next steps. [1][3]
- Diagnosis: post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, because the hCG has plateaued across four values over about four weeks.[1][3]
- Criteria met: the FIGO hCG criteria for post-molar GTN — a sustained plateau (no significant fall; operationally a fall of less than 10%) — also includes a sustained rise (over 10%), persistence beyond six months, histological choriocarcinoma, or metastases.[1][3]
- Next steps: confirm the hCG is real with a urine test (exclude phantom hCG) and exclude a new pregnancy with ultrasound; register with the regional trophoblast centre; stage and score; examine for metastases; then risk-stratify treatment.[3]
(b) FIGO 2000 anatomic staging (3 marks)
Reproduce verbatim — one mark roughly per stage band, all four for full marks. [1][2]
- Stage I: disease confined to the uterine corpus.
- Stage II: GTN extends outside the uterus but is limited to the genital tract structures (adnexa, vagina, broad ligament).
- Stage III: GTN extends to the lungs, with or without genital tract involvement.
- Stage IV: all other metastatic sites.
The stage and the WHO score are written together as a single figure (for example, Stage I:3).[2]
(c) The WHO eight-variable score and the cut-off (5 marks)
Up to one mark each for the variables named and the cut-off and the Charing Cross convention. [2][3]
The eight variables, each scored 0, 1, 2 or 4: [1]
- Age
- Antecedent pregnancy (mole, abortion, term)
- Interval (months) from index pregnancy
- Pre-treatment serum hCG
- Largest tumour size, including uterus
- Site of metastases (lung; spleen or kidney; gastrointestinal; liver or brain)
- Number of metastases identified
- Previous failed chemotherapy (none; single drug; two or more drugs)
Cut-off: a total score of 6 or below is low-risk (single-agent chemotherapy); 7 or above is high-risk (multi-agent EMA-CO).[3] Charing Cross convention: patients scoring 0 to 8 are low-risk (methotrexate-folinic acid), over 8 high-risk (EMA-CO).[4]
(d) First-line chemotherapy and expected outcome (4 marks)
Two marks for the regimen with dose and schedule, one for consolidation, one for the outcome. [4][5]
- The Charing Cross 8-day methotrexate-folinic acid regimen: methotrexate 50 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 3, 5 and 7, with folinic acid (leucovorin) rescue on days 2, 4, 6 and 8, repeated every two weeks.[4][5]
- Continue until hCG normalises, then give consolidation cycles.[3]
- The alternative is pulsed actinomycin-D 1.25 mg per square metre intravenously every two weeks, used first-line where methotrexate is contraindicated or second-line on resistance.[5]
- Expected outcome: the McNeish 2002 Charing Cross cohort of 485 women reported 100% overall survival; hCG normalised with methotrexate alone in about 67%, with about a third needing a change of single agent without survival compromise.[4]
You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship atlas.
References6Show ledgerHide ledger
- [1]FIGO Oncology Committee FIGO staging for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia 2000. FIGO Oncology Committee. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2002.PMID 12065144
- [2]Ngan HY, Bender H, Benedet JL, et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, FIGO 2000 staging and classification. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2003.PMID 14763174
- [3]Soper JT Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Current Evaluation and Management. Obstet Gynecol, 2021.PMID 33416290
- [4]McNeish IA, Strickland S, Holden L, Rustin GJ, Foskett M, Seckl MJ, Newlands ES Low-risk persistent gestational trophoblastic disease: outcome after initial treatment with low-dose methotrexate and folinic acid from 1992 to 2000. J Clin Oncol, 2002.PMID 11919242
- [5]Jiang F, Guan CL, Jiao LZ, Xu T, Wan XR, Shi SS, et al. Efficacy and safety of biweekly single-dose actinomycin D versus multiday methotrexate in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Ann Oncol, 2025.PMID 40543844
- [6]Alifrangis C, Agarwal R, Short D, Fisher RA, Sebire NJ, Harvey R, Savage PM, Seckl MJ EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: good outcomes with induction low-dose etoposide-cisplatin and genetic analysis. J Clin Oncol, 2013.PMID 23233709