O&G SAQs · Gynaecological oncology
Endometrial hyperplasia and atypia — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on endometrial hyperplasia and atypia: WHO 2014 two-tier classification, the GOG concurrent-carcinoma data, the fertility-sparing surveillance pathway, and the progestogen doses. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page & tools
Target exams
FRANZCOGMRCOGABOG
Prompt
A 54-year-old woman, parity 2, BMI 34, presents with postmenopausal bleeding for 6 weeks. Outpatient Pipelle biopsy reports atypical hyperplasia (AH). (a) Classify endometrial hyperplasia using the revised 2014 WHO system, and state why atypia is the dominant predictor of progression. (3 marks) (b) State the risk of concurrent endometrial carcinoma at hysterectomy for biopsy-diagnosed AH and justify your first-line management for this woman. (4 marks) (c) Reproduce the fertility-sparing surveillance pathway for a 32-year-old with AH who wishes to retain fertility. (5 marks) (d) State the first-line oral progestogen regimen with doses, and explain why cyclical progestogens are not used. (3 marks)
How this SAQ is marked
Marks come from the verbatim classification, the concurrent-carcinoma data, the surveillance pathway, and the precise progestogen doses. Write in short labelled points. [3]
Reveal model answer and mark scheme
(a) WHO 2014 classification and the role of atypia (3 marks)
- The revised 2014 WHO classification separates endometrial hyperplasia into two groups based on the presence of cytological atypia: (i) hyperplasia without atypia and (ii) atypical hyperplasia (AH), also termed endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN).[1][3]
- Cytologic atypia (nuclear enlargement, pleomorphism, hyperchromasia, prominent nucleoli, loss of polarity) — not architectural complexity alone — is the dominant predictor of progression. Kurman 1985: progression in 1.6 percent of hyperplasia without atypia (2 of 122) versus 23 percent of atypical hyperplasia (11 of 48); complex atypical hyperplasia 29 percent (10 of 35).
- The 2014 system replaces the 1994 four-tier schema (simple/complex x non-atypical/atypical) because architectural complexity alone is a weak discriminator.
(b) Concurrent carcinoma risk and first-line management (4 marks)
One mark per point, maximum four. [2][3]
- The GOG prospective cohort (Trimble 2006) found a 42.6 percent rate of concurrent endometrial carcinoma at hysterectomy within 12 weeks of an AH biopsy; 30.9 percent of those were myoinvasive.[2]
- A community diagnosis of AH also has high pathology discordance: central GOG re-review down-graded 25.6 percent to less than AH and up-graded 29.1 percent to frank carcinoma.
- First-line management for this 54-year-old is total hysterectomy (BSO because she is postmenopausal), laparoscopic preferred — because of the risk of concurrent or future invasive malignancy.
- Refer to gynaecological oncology, consent for cancer surgery (possible intra-operative staging), and avoid morcellation to prevent upstaging occult carcinoma.
(c) Fertility-sparing surveillance pathway (5 marks)
One mark per point, maximum five. [3][4]
- For a woman with AH wishing to preserve fertility or unfit for surgery: first-line LNG-IUS, oral progestogens second-line.[3]
- Endometrial biopsy every 3 months until two consecutive negative biopsies are obtained.
- After regression, biopsy every 6 to 12 months until a hysterectomy is performed.
- Once fertility is no longer required, hysterectomy should be offered in view of the high risk of disease progression and relapse (Gallos 2013: relapse 13.7 percent LNG-IUS, 30.3 percent oral progestogen).
- Refer to a fertility specialist; achieve regression on at least one biopsy before attempting conception; counsel clearly on the concurrent-cancer risk.
(d) Oral progestogen regimen and cyclical avoidance (3 marks)
One mark per point. [3]
- Continuous oral progestogens: medroxyprogesterone acetate 10–20 mg/day (or an equivalent continuous progestogen such as norethisterone), for women who decline the LNG-IUS.[3]
- Minimum 6 months treatment to induce histological regression.
- Cyclical progestogens are not used because they are less effective than continuous oral progestogens or the LNG-IUS at inducing regression.
Continue reading
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro
You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship atlas.
References4Show ledgerHide ledger
- [1]Kurman RJ, Kaminski PF, Norris HJ The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of 'untreated' hyperplasia in 170 patients. Cancer, 1985.PMID 4005805
- [2]Trimble CL, Kauderer J, Zaino R, et al. Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer, 2006.PMID 16400639
- [3]Trimble CL, Method M, Leitao M, et al. Management of endometrial precancers. Obstet Gynecol, 2012.PMID 23090535
- [4]Gallos ID, Krishan P, Shehmar M, et al. LNG-IUS versus oral progestogen treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a long-term comparative cohort study. Hum Reprod, 2013.PMID 23975691