O&G SAQs · Gynaecological health — chronic pain
Chronic pelvic pain — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on chronic pelvic pain: the 6-month definition, the five-system biopsychosocial model, the structured assessment, and the multidisciplinary stepped-care management with evidence. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
Write your answer
Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.
How this SAQ is marked
Marks come from the verbatim definition, the five-system model, the structured assessment, and the evidence behind the management. Write in short labelled points. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Definition and duration threshold (2 marks)
- Definition: chronic pelvic pain is non-cyclic pain localised to the pelvis, anterior abdominal wall at or below the umbilicus, lumbosacral back or buttocks, of sufficient severity to cause functional disability or warrant medical care. [1]
- Duration threshold: at least six months. (1 mark for each.)[1]
(b) The five-system biopsychosocial model (5 marks)
One mark for each system correctly listed with one example cause, plus one mark for the principle that more than one cause usually coexists. [1][4]
- Gynaecological — endometriosis, adenomyosis (this woman's history and dyspareunia fit).
- Urological — bladder pain syndrome / interstitial cystitis (her urinary frequency fits).
- Gastrointestinal — irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease.
- Musculoskeletal — pelvic floor myofascial pain, pudendal neuralgia.
- Psychological — depression, anxiety, central sensitisation (her low mood fits).[1][4]
(c) Structured assessment (5 marks)
- History — pain map (onset, location, character, radiation, severity 0-10, cyclical vs continuous, exacerbating/relieving); screen each of the five systems; psychosocial history including impact on work, sleep, mood, sex and a trauma-informed screen for abuse. [1]
- Examination — abdominal palpation (scars, masses, trigger points); speculum (visualise cervix, take cervical screen/swabs); bimanual (uterine size, mobility, tenderness, adnexa, pouch of Douglas, uterosacral ligament nodularity); focused pelvic floor and musculoskeletal assessment (hypertonic pelvic floor, trigger points reproducing the pain).[4]
- Investigations — FBC, ESR/CRP, urinalysis and culture, pregnancy test; transvaginal ultrasound first-line; pelvic MRI for suspected deep infiltrating endometriosis; refer to urology for cystoscopy and to gastroenterology for endoscopy where symptoms warrant. A normal TVUS does not exclude significant pathology.[4]
- Recognise that a diagnostic laparoscopy is not mandatory and that a normal laparoscopy (in up to one-third) does not invalidate the symptom.[1][4]
- State explicitly that the assessment screens every system because more than one cause usually coexists.[1]
(d) Management options and evidence (3 marks)
One mark per option with a correct evidence statement. [4]
- NSAID or hormonal suppression for the nociceptive and cyclical component — empirical hormonal therapy before laparoscopy is acceptable for cyclical pain without red flags (ESHRE).[4]
- Pelvic floor physiotherapy for the musculoskeletal/myofascial component — often the single most effective intervention in women with trigger points.
- Cognitive behavioural therapy for the biopsychosocial component — the systematic review of psychological therapies for chronic pelvic pain shows improvement in functioning and depression scores.[3]
- Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis for surgically treatable disease — but state explicitly that LUNA is not effective (JAMA RCT and IPD meta-analysis).[2]
Common errors that lose marks
- Calling episodic acute pain "chronic pelvic pain" (the 6-month threshold is the bedrock).
- Listing only gynaecological causes — the five-system model is the point of the question.
- Offering LUNA as a surgical option — it is not effective.
- Recommending chronic opioids — they have no role and worsen central sensitisation.
- Saying a normal laparoscopy "rules out" chronic pelvic pain — it does not.[1][4]
Examiner notes
A high-scoring candidate defends the biopsychosocial model, screens every system, and knows the LUNA evidence. The chronic-pelvic-pain clinic is the organisational answer to the multifactorial model and earns a mark when mentioned. [1][4]
References4ShowHide
- [1]Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, et al. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health, 2006.PMID 16824213
- [2]Daniels J, Gray R, Hills RK, et al. Laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation for alleviating chronic pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2009.PMID 19724042
- [3]Champaneria R, Daniels JP, Raza A, et al. Psychological therapies for chronic pelvic pain: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2012.PMID 22050516
- [4]Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2014.PMID 24435778