O&G SAQs · Gynaecological oncology — screening and prevention
Cervical screening and HPV — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on cervical screening: NCSP eligibility and self-collection policy, the reflex cytology triage pathway for an HPV-positive sample (HPV 16/18 versus other high-risk HPV), the post-LLETZ test of cure, and the rationale for the start age of 25. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Marks come from the verbatim NCSP eligibility, the universal self-collection policy, the reflex cytology triage pathway, the post-LLETZ test of cure, and the rationale for the start age of 25 with the symptoms-override caveat. Write in short labelled points. [2]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) NCSP eligibility, frequency, and self-collection (3 marks)
One mark each for age range, frequency, self-collection. [2]
- Age range: women and people with a cervix aged 25 to 74 years.
- Frequency: every 5 years, with an HPV-based Cervical Screening Test (CST).
- Self-collection: universally available for all eligible participants since 1 July 2022, in clinic or at home; concordance with clinician-collection is high when validated PCR-based assays are used.
(b) Next step after HPV 16 positive on self-collection (3 marks)
One mark for the action, one for the rationale, one for the workflow. [2]
- Refer to colposcopy now. HPV 16 is referred to colposcopy regardless of the reflex cytology result.
- Because reflex cytology could not be performed on the self-collected sample, the woman returns for a clinician-collected sample to allow cytology triage AND proceed to colposcopy.
- HPV 16 alone causes about 55 to 60 percent of all cervical cancer; a negative cytology does not exclude a high-grade lesion that cytology has missed.
(c) NCSP reflex cytology triage pathway (4 marks)
One mark per row. [2]
- HPV not detected: return to 5-yearly routine screening.
- HPV 16 or 18 detected: refer colposcopy regardless of reflex cytology.
- Other high-risk HPV with pHSIL, HSIL or greater on reflex cytology: refer colposcopy.
- Other high-risk HPV with LSIL or negative reflex cytology: repeat HPV test in 12 months; if still positive at 12 months, refer colposcopy.
(d) Post-LLETZ test of cure (2 marks)
One mark for the test, one for the action on each result. [2]
- HPV test at 6 to 12 months after LLETZ is the test of cure.
- If HPV is not detected, return to 5-yearly routine screening.
- If HPV is still detected, refer back to colposcopy.
(e) Rationale for start age of 25 and the symptoms-override rule (3 marks)
One mark for three reasons (any three), one for the symptoms-override caveat, one for completeness. [2][4]
Three reasons Australia moved the start age from 18/20 to 25 in December 2017:[2][4]
- Very low cancer incidence under 25 (about 1 to 2 percent of all cases).
- High HPV clearance in young women (up to 40 to 50 percent HPV-positive at any time, most clearing within one to two years) — screening produces many false positives.
- The harms of over-treatment — excision of CIN 2/3 in young women increases the risk of preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes and low birthweight (Kyrgiou 2016), with no benefit for CIN that would have regressed.
- HPV vaccination of adolescents has further reduced high-grade CIN in this age group.
The one exception: a woman under 25 with symptoms (postcoital or persistent intermenstrual bleeding, or a visible lesion) needs diagnostic colposcopy — the screening age is for asymptomatic screening only.
[2][4]References4ShowHide
- [1]Arbyn M, Castle PE, Schiffman M, et al. Meta-analysis of agreement/concordance statistics in studies comparing self- vs clinician-collected samples for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer, 2022.PMID 35179777
- [2]Smith M, Hammond I, Saville M, et al. Lessons from the renewal of the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia. Public Health Res Pract, 2019.PMID 31384888
- [3]Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, et al. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet, 2014.PMID 24192252
- [4]Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 2016.PMID 27469988