Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G SAQsGynaecological oncology — screening and prevention

O&G SAQs · Gynaecological oncology — screening and prevention

Cervical screening and HPV — structured SAQ (15 marks)

FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on cervical screening: NCSP eligibility and self-collection policy, the reflex cytology triage pathway for an HPV-positive sample (HPV 16/18 versus other high-risk HPV), the post-LLETZ test of cure, and the rationale for the start age of 25. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.

15 marks20 min3 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI
Prompt
A 35-year-old woman, para 1, attends your GP clinic. She has not had a cervical screen for 10 years and is anxious about speculum examination. She asks whether she can 'do the test herself'. Her Cervical Screening Test (self-collected vaginal swab) returns positive for HPV type 16. Reflex cytology could not be performed on the self-collected sample. (a) State the eligibility criteria for the Australian National Cervical Screening Program: age range, frequency, and the self-collection policy including its start date. (3 marks) (b) Explain the correct next step after this result and justify your reasoning. (3 marks) (c) Reproduce the NCSP reflex cytology triage pathway for an HPV-positive clinician-collected sample, distinguishing HPV 16/18 from other high-risk HPV and the action for each cytology grade. (4 marks) (d) A subsequent colposcopy confirms CIN 3 and she undergoes LLETZ with clear margins. State the post-treatment 'test of cure' and the surveillance plan. (2 marks) (e) Explain why the NCSP starts screening at age 25 rather than 18 or 20, citing three reasons, and state the one situation in which a woman under 25 would still need investigation. (3 marks)

How this SAQ is marked

Marks come from the verbatim NCSP eligibility, the universal self-collection policy, the reflex cytology triage pathway, the post-LLETZ test of cure, and the rationale for the start age of 25 with the symptoms-override caveat. Write in short labelled points. [2]

Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide

(a) NCSP eligibility, frequency, and self-collection (3 marks)

One mark each for age range, frequency, self-collection. [2]

  • Age range: women and people with a cervix aged 25 to 74 years.
  • Frequency: every 5 years, with an HPV-based Cervical Screening Test (CST).
  • Self-collection: universally available for all eligible participants since 1 July 2022, in clinic or at home; concordance with clinician-collection is high when validated PCR-based assays are used.
[2]

(b) Next step after HPV 16 positive on self-collection (3 marks)

One mark for the action, one for the rationale, one for the workflow. [2]

  • Refer to colposcopy now. HPV 16 is referred to colposcopy regardless of the reflex cytology result.
  • Because reflex cytology could not be performed on the self-collected sample, the woman returns for a clinician-collected sample to allow cytology triage AND proceed to colposcopy.
  • HPV 16 alone causes about 55 to 60 percent of all cervical cancer; a negative cytology does not exclude a high-grade lesion that cytology has missed.
[2][1]

(c) NCSP reflex cytology triage pathway (4 marks)

One mark per row. [2]

  • HPV not detected: return to 5-yearly routine screening.
  • HPV 16 or 18 detected: refer colposcopy regardless of reflex cytology.
  • Other high-risk HPV with pHSIL, HSIL or greater on reflex cytology: refer colposcopy.
  • Other high-risk HPV with LSIL or negative reflex cytology: repeat HPV test in 12 months; if still positive at 12 months, refer colposcopy.
[2]

(d) Post-LLETZ test of cure (2 marks)

One mark for the test, one for the action on each result. [2]

  • Post-treatment HPV surveillance per the current NCSP test-of-cure pathway is the test of cure — confirm the interval and stopping rule in the current guideline.
  • If HPV is not detected, return to routine screening.
  • If HPV is still detected, refer back to colposcopy.
[2]

(e) Rationale for start age of 25 and the symptoms-override rule (3 marks)

One mark for three reasons (any three), one for the symptoms-override caveat, one for completeness. [2][4]

Three reasons Australia moved the start age from 18/20 to 25 in December 2017:[2][4]

  • Very low cancer incidence under 25 (about 1 to 2 percent of all cases).
  • High HPV clearance in young women (up to 40 to 50 percent HPV-positive at any time, most clearing within one to two years) — screening produces many false positives.
  • The harms of over-treatment — excision of CIN 2/3 in young women increases the risk of preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes and low birthweight (Kyrgiou 2016), with no benefit for CIN that would have regressed.
  • HPV vaccination of adolescents has further reduced high-grade CIN in this age group.

The one exception: a woman under 25 with symptoms (postcoital or persistent intermenstrual bleeding, or a visible lesion) needs diagnostic colposcopy — the screening age is for asymptomatic screening only.

[2][4]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References4ShowHide
  1. [1]Arbyn M, Castle PE, Schiffman M, et al. Meta-analysis of agreement/concordance statistics in studies comparing self- vs clinician-collected samples for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer, 2022.PMID 35179777
  2. [2]Smith M, Hammond I, Saville M, et al. Lessons from the renewal of the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia. Public Health Res Pract, 2019.PMID 31384888
  3. [3]Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, et al. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet, 2014.PMID 24192252
  4. [4]Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 2016.PMID 27469988
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousCervical cerclage — structured SAQ (15 marks)Intrapartum care — preterm birth preventionNextChronic pelvic pain — structured SAQ (15 marks)Gynaecological health — chronic pain