O&G SAQs · Antenatal care — fetal presentation and mode of birth
Breech presentation at term and external cephalic version — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on breech at term: ECV counselling with timing, success and complications, contraindications, the procedure and post-procedure care, and the mode-of-birth counselling quoting the Term Breech Trial and PREMODA. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Twelve SAQs, 180 marks, two 2-hour papers — roughly 15 marks and 20 minutes each. Marks come from specifics: timing, success rate, complication rates, contraindications, and the trial numbers. Write in short labelled points, not prose paragraphs. [1]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) ECV counselling — timing, success, complications (5 marks)
One mark per point, maximum five. [1][5]
- Timing: offer ECV at 36-37 weeks — after most spontaneous version has occurred, while the fetus remains turnable, and if a complication requires delivery the baby is essentially term.[5]
- Success rate: approximately 50% overall, with higher success in multiparous women, with good liquor volume, an unengaged breech, and under neuraxial analgesia.[1]
- Complications are rare: the most common is transient abnormal CTG changes at about 5.7% which almost always resolve; emergency caesarean in about 0.43% of versions; persisting pathological CTG 0.37%, vaginal bleeding 0.47%, placental abruption 0.12%, perinatal mortality 0.16%.[4]
- Evidence: the Cochrane review found ECV reduced non-cephalic presentation at birth (RR 0.42) and caesarean section (RR 0.57) with no significant increase in complications.[1]
- Setting: performed in a hospital where emergency caesarean is available within an agreed timeframe, with consent and fasting.[5]
(b) Contraindications to ECV (3 marks)
One mark for any three valid contraindications. [5]
- A caesarean already indicated for another reason (e.g. placenta praevia).[5]
- Antepartum haemorrhage within the preceding seven days.[5]
- An abnormal CTG.[5]
- A major uterine anomaly or significant cavity-distorting fibroid.[5]
- Ruptured membranes.[5]
- Multiple pregnancy (singleton ECV does not apply).[5]
- Note: a previous single lower-segment caesarean is not an absolute contraindication — ECV may be offered with informed counselling on the small rupture risk.[5]
(c) The ECV procedure step by step (4 marks)
One mark per stage. Marks are lost for omitting anti-D or the post-procedure CTG. [1][5]
- Pre-procedure: consent; CTG to confirm fetal wellbeing; ultrasound to confirm breech type, placental site and liquor volume; check maternal blood group; fasting.[5]
- Tocolysis: a beta-agonist (e.g. terbutaline or salbutamol) to relax the uterine wall; alternatives include nitroglycerin or atosiban.[1]
- The manoeuvre: warm hands, talc or oil to reduce friction; lift the breech out of the pelvis, then rotate the fetus in a forward or backward roll (forward more common); monitor the CTG throughout.[5]
- Post-procedure: repeat CTG for 30-60 minutes; confirm presentation by ultrasound; give anti-D immunoglobulin to Rh-negative women (fetomaternal transfusion risk); document the outcome and agree the birth plan.[4][5]
(d) Mode-of-birth counselling after failed ECV (3 marks)
One mark per point. Must quote both trials. [2][3]
- Term Breech Trial (Hannah 2000): planned caesarean reduced the composite of perinatal/neonatal mortality or serious morbidity — 1.6% versus 5.0% (RR 0.33) — with no difference in serious maternal morbidity. This drove the global shift to planned caesarean.[2]
- PREMODA (Goffinet 2006): under strict selection, planned vaginal breech carried a combined adverse neonatal outcome of 1.60% that did not differ significantly from planned caesarean (adjusted OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.89-2.23). It supports planned vaginal as a defensible option where strict criteria are met.[3]
- Counselling synthesis: planned caesarean carries the lowest neonatal risk in unselected populations; planned vaginal under strict selection (frank or complete breech, no fetal compromise, adequate pelvis, experienced accoucheur, continuous monitoring) is a reasonable option. The choice is the woman's, made on informed counsel.[3][5]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM External cephalic version for breech presentation at term Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015.PMID 25828903
- [2]Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group Lancet, 2000.PMID 11052579
- [3]Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006.PMID 16580289
- [4]Collaris RJ, Oei SG External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2004.PMID 15144330
- [5]Fiorentini M, Nedu B, Dapoto F, et al. Breech Presentation: Delivery Management and Future Perspectives Matern Fetal Med, 2026.PMID 42051645
- [6]Coyle ME, Smith C, Peat B Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023.PMID 37158339