O&G SAQs · Intrapartum care — operative birth
Caesarean birth — structured SAQ (15 marks)
FRANZCOG-format structured SAQ on caesarean birth: urgency classification and decision-to-delivery standards, antibiotic prophylaxis with agent, dose, route and timing, the deeply impacted head with an honest reading of the evidence, visceral injury rates and recognition, and weight-based thromboprophylaxis. Per-sub-part marking rubric included.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
How this SAQ is marked
Marks are awarded for named specifics: the category and its standard, the drug with dose and timing, the technique with its evidence grade, and the number attached to each complication. Write labelled points. Vague answers such as "give antibiotics and deliver quickly" score almost nothing. [1][2]
Reveal model answer and mark schemeShowHide
(a) Urgency category (2 marks)
- Category 2 (1 mark) — maternal or fetal compromise that is not immediately life-threatening. There is fetal compromise on the CTG but no prolonged bradycardia, cord prolapse or maternal collapse.[1]
- Audited standard 75 minutes from decision to birth (1 mark). Category 1 carries the 30-minute standard.[1]
- Credit for adding: the category can be revised upward if she deteriorates, and constant pain with a previous caesarean means scar rupture must stay on the differential, which would make it category 1.[1]
(b) Antibiotic prophylaxis (4 marks)
| Element | Answer |
|---|---|
| Agent | A first-generation cephalosporin — intravenous cefazolin |
| Dose | Weight-based: 1 to 2 g, and 2 g for women with obesity or weight of 80 kg or more (she qualifies) |
| Route and timing | Intravenous, within 60 minutes before skin incision |
| Adjunct | Azithromycin 500 mg IV, because this is an unscheduled caesarean in labour |
Justification for the timing (2 of the 4 marks): the Cochrane review of 10 studies and 5041 women found that giving prophylaxis before skin incision rather than after cord clamping reduced composite maternal infectious morbidity (risk ratio 0.57), endometritis (0.54) and wound infection (0.59), with no clear difference in neonatal sepsis.[3]
Justification for azithromycin: in 2013 women having an unscheduled caesarean in labour or after membrane rupture, adding azithromycin 500 mg IV to standard prophylaxis reduced the composite of endometritis, wound infection or other infection from 12.0% to 6.1% (relative risk 0.51), with fewer serious maternal adverse events.[4]
(c) The deeply impacted head (4 marks)
- Call for help and prepare before you commit (1 mark): a second clinician for elevation from below, adequate anaesthesia, consider tocolysis to relax the uterus, and a generous, controlled hysterotomy.[5]
- Name the techniques (2 marks): coordinated vaginal elevation of the head from below; reverse breech extraction, delivering a foot from the fundus; the Patwardhan method, delivering the shoulders and trunk first; and a fetal elevation device placed before the operation.[5][6]
- Comment on the evidence (1 mark): the 2024 systematic review of 24 studies and 3558 women graded all 96 outcomes as low or very low certainty and made no firm recommendation for any technique; the Cochrane review likewise found insufficient randomised evidence, with limited evidence that reverse breech extraction may improve outcomes. The defensible answer is training in all techniques and early recognition rather than a single preferred manoeuvre.[5][6]
- Anticipate the consequence: inspect both uterine angles for a J or inverted-T extension, check the bladder, and expect a higher risk of haemorrhage.[7]
(d) Visceral injury (3 marks)
- List (1 mark): bladder (cystotomy), ureter, bowel, and — as related surgical morbidity — uterine vessel laceration at the angles and fetal laceration.[7][8]
- Incidence (1 mark, any two): pooled across 1,741,894 women, bladder injury occurred at about 267 per 100,000 caesareans (roughly 1 in 375) and ureteric injury at about 9 per 100,000 (roughly 1 in 11,000). Risk rises with the number of previous caesareans; in the multiple-repeat-caesarean cohort, cystotomy, bowel injury and ureteric injury all increased significantly with each additional operation.[7][8]
- Recognising bladder injury (1 mark): direct visualisation of the defect or of the Foley balloon, blood-stained urine in the catheter bag, gas or urine in the operative field, and confirmation with intravesical dye or methylene blue. Involve urology for a large or trigonal injury, repair in layers, and leave an indwelling catheter for prolonged drainage.[7]
(e) Thromboprophylaxis (2 marks)
- Mechanical for everyone (0.5 mark): graduated compression or intermittent pneumatic compression preoperatively, continued until she is mobile, with early mobilisation from about 4 hours.[2][10]
- Chemoprophylaxis (1.5 marks): she has multiple risk factors — obesity, emergency caesarean in labour, age over 30 — so low molecular weight heparin is indicated for at least 10 days postpartum. Dose by weight, not by habit: a randomised trial stopped early for efficacy found weight-based enoxaparin achieved prophylactic anti-Xa levels in 66% versus 44% with fixed 40 mg dosing (relative risk 1.49), and 52% versus 15% at the postoperative visit.[9]
References10ShowHide
- [1]Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification J R Soc Med, 2000.PMID 10928020
- [2]Mackeen AD, Sullivan MV, Berghella V Evidence-based cesarean delivery: preoperative management (part 7) Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 2024.PMID 38574855
- [3]Mackeen AD, Packard RE, Ota E, et al. Timing of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for preventing postpartum infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean delivery Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014.PMID 25479008
- [4]Tita AT, Szychowski JM, Boggess K, et al. Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery N Engl J Med, 2016.PMID 27682034
- [5]Waterfall H, Grivell RM, Dodd JM Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016.PMID 26827159
- [6]Cornthwaite K, van der Scheer JW, Kelly S, et al. Management of impacted fetal head at cesarean birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2024.PMID 38787368
- [7]Wei G, Harley F, O'Callaghan M, et al. Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy Int Urogynecol J, 2023.PMID 36251061
- [8]Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries Obstet Gynecol, 2006.PMID 16738145
- [9]Bruno AM, Allshouse AA, Campbell HM, et al. Weight-Based Compared With Fixed-Dose Enoxaparin Prophylaxis After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Obstet Gynecol, 2022.PMID 36075079
- [10]Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, et al. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2) Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018.PMID 30118692