ICU · Resuscitation
Critical care ultrasound (POCUS) in ICU
Also known as Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) · Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) · Bedside ultrasound · Lung ultrasound (BLUE protocol) · RUSH protocol · Critical care ultrasonography (CCUS) · FATE (Focused Assessed Transthoracic Echo) · FALLS (Fluid Administration Limited by Lung Sonography)
Critical care ultrasound (CCUS), or point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), is a core ICU skill — a rapid, non-invasive, repeatable, bedside imaging modality performed and interpreted by the treating clinician at the moment of decision-making. It is an EXTENSION of the clinical examination, not a replacement for formal imaging. Applications span five domains: (1) Cardiac — focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS/FATE) for LV and RV function, pericardial effusion and tamponade, volume status, and gross valve pathology, with the RUSH protocol integrating the 'pump' into shock assessment; (2) Lung — the BLUE protocol using A-lines (normal air), B-lines (interstitial syndrome — oedema, ARDS, fibrosis), consolidation, pleural effusion, and absent lung sliding with a lung point for pneumothorax; (3) Abdominal — FAST/eFAST for free fluid (haemorrhage), gallbladder (cholecystitis), bladder volume, and AAA screening; (4) Vascular — two-point or whole-leg compression sonography for DVT, and real-time ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter (CVC) insertion; (5) Procedural — line placement, thoracentesis, paracentesis, drain insertion. Organising protocols include RUSH (Rapid Ultrasound in Shock — pump, tank, pipes), BLUE (Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency), FATE (Focused Assessment with Transthoracic Echocardiography), and FALLS (using B-lines to titrate fluids). POCUS does NOT replace formal echocardiography, CT, or comprehensive departmental ultrasound: it is goal-directed, focused, repeatable, and integrated with the clinical picture. Competency is defined by international consensus statements (ACCP/SRLF competence statement, the WINFOCUS/ICM evidence-based lung ultrasound recommendations, and the EACVI focus cardiac ultrasound core curriculum) and assessed through structured certification (FATE, CEUS/ICS FoCCUS, FUSIC, ACEP emergency ultrasound).
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- POCUS is an EXTENSION of clinical examination — not a replacement for formal imaging
- Absent lung sliding = pneumothorax until proven otherwise (confirm with lung point or CT if stable)
- B-lines (comet tails) = interstitial syndrome (pulmonary oedema, ARDS, interstitial fibrosis) — not a normal finding
- FoCUS for shock: identify type (hypovolaemic, cardiogenic, obstructive, distributive) within minutes
- A pericardial effusion with RV diastolic collapse and a distended IVC is tamponade physiology — intervene on clinical grounds, do not wait for formal echo
- A dilated RV with septal shift in the right clinical setting is presumed massive PE until proven otherwise
- A non-compressible vein on compression sonography is DVT — sensitivity over 95 per cent for proximal DVT
- Never proceed with CVC insertion if ultrasound shows the vein and artery are not clearly distinguishable
Overview and rationale
Critical care ultrasound (CCUS) is the bedside use of ultrasound by the intensivist to answer focused, time-critical clinical questions at the point of care. Unlike a departmental study — performed by a sonographer, reported by a radiologist or cardiologist, and delivered hours later — CCUS is performed and interpreted in real time by the clinician responsible for the patient, and the result is immediately folded into the differential diagnosis and the next therapeutic step. For this reason CCUS is best understood not as an imaging modality but as an extension of the clinical examination — the modern equivalent of the stethoscope, used to confirm or refute a hypothesis formed at the bedside.[1][5]
The value of CCUS in the ICU is that it is rapid (a focused exam takes minutes), non-invasive, repeatable (serial exams track change in real time), free of ionising radiation, and transportable to the patient who is too unstable to move. Its limitations are equally important to hold in mind: it is operator-dependent, its accuracy is bounded by image quality (obesity, surgical emphysema, bowel gas, bandages all degrade it), and it is a focused study — it does not substitute for formal echocardiography, computed tomography, or comprehensive departmental ultrasound when those are indicated and the patient is stable enough to obtain them.[1][4]
[1]References25ShowHide
- [1]Mayo PH, Beaulieu Y, Doelken P, et al. American College of Chest Physicians/La Société de Réanimation de Langue Française statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography Chest, 2009.PMID 19188546
- [2]Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol Chest, 2008.PMID 18403664
- [3]Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound Intensive Care Med, 2012.PMID 22392031
- [4]Via G, Hussain A, Wells M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for focused cardiac ultrasound J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2014.PMID 24951446
- [5]Moore CL, Copel JA Point-of-care ultrasonography N Engl J Med, 2011.PMID 21345104
- [6]Brass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015.PMID 25575245
- [7]Neskovic AN, Skinner H, Price S, et al. Focus cardiac ultrasound core curriculum and core syllabus of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018.PMID 29529170
- [8]Barbier C, Loubières Y, Schmit C, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients Intensive Care Med, 2004.PMID 15034650
- [9]Volpicelli G, Boero E, Sverzellati N, et al. Semi-quantification of pneumothorax volume by lung ultrasound Intensive Care Med, 2014.PMID 25056671
- [10]Heijboer H, Büller HR, Lensing AW, et al. A comparison of real-time compression ultrasonography with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients N Engl J Med, 1993.PMID 8413431
- [11]Cogo A, Lensing AW, Koopman MM, et al. Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study BMJ, 1998.PMID 9451260
- [12]Lichtenstein DA Lung ultrasound in the critically ill Ann Intensive Care, 2014.PMID 24401163
- [13]Alerhand S, Adrian RJ, Long B, et al. Pericardial tamponade: A comprehensive emergency medicine and echocardiography review Am J Emerg Med, 2022.PMID 35696801
- [14]Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Teboul JL Pulsus paradoxus Eur Respir J, 2013.PMID 23222878
- [15]Vakamudi S, Ho N, Cremer PC Pericardial Effusions: Causes, Diagnosis, and Management Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2017.PMID 28062268
- [16]Ha JW, Ommen SR, Tajik AJ, et al. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy using mitral annular velocity by tissue Doppler echocardiography Am J Cardiol, 2004.PMID 15276095
- [17]Qamruddin S, Alkharabsheh SK, Sato K, et al. Differentiating Constriction from Restriction (from the Mayo Clinic Echocardiographic Criteria) Am J Cardiol, 2019.PMID 31353007
- [18]Plotnick GD, Rubin DC, Feliciano Z, et al. Pulmonary hypertension decreases the predictive accuracy of echocardiographic clues for cardiac tamponade Chest, 1995.PMID 7705154
- [19]Dicuio M, Pomara G, Menchini Fabris F, et al. Measurements of urinary bladder volume: comparison of five ultrasound calculation methods in volunteers Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2005.PMID 15906795
- [20]Stoffel JT, Peterson AC, Sandhu JS, et al. AUA White Paper on Nonneurogenic Chronic Urinary Retention: Consensus Definition, Treatment Algorithm, and Outcome End Points J Urol, 2017.PMID 28163030
- [21]Christiaans CHH, de Klerk J, van Velsen AK, et al. Postvoid Residual Thresholds Used to Define Chronic Urinary Retention: A Systematic Review Eur Urol Open Sci, 2026.PMID 42436676
- [22]Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, et al. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll Emerg Med Clin North Am, 2010.PMID 19945597
- [23]Savoia P, Jayanthi SK, Chammas MC Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) J Med Ultrasound, 2023.PMID 37576415
- [24]Akoglu H, Celik OF, Celik A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Extended Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma (E-FAST) performed by emergency physicians compared to CT Am J Emerg Med, 2018.PMID 29146418
- [25]Javedani PP, Metzger GS, Oulton JR, et al. Use of Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma Examination Skills in the Evaluation of Non-trauma Patients Cureus, 2018.PMID 29560289