Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

ICU TopicsGI/Nutrition

ICU · GI/Nutrition

Nutrition in the ICU

Also known as Critical illness nutrition · Enteral nutrition (EN) · Parenteral nutrition (PN) · Early enteral nutrition · Refeeding syndrome · ESPEN guidelines

Nutrition is a critical component of ICU care. Early enteral nutrition is the default — the landmark trials initiated feeding within 24-36 hours — while early supplemental parenteral nutrition is harmful (EPaNIC: late PN meant fewer infections and shorter ventilation). NUTRIC score stratifies nutrition risk (high NUTRIC = patient who benefits most from adequate delivery). Energy: normocaloric 20-25 kcal/kg/day (NUTRIREA-2); permissive underfeeding (40-60% of calories with protein maintained) was as safe as full feeding (PermiT) and an extra ~600 kcal/day did not improve survival (TARGET). Protein: achieving at least 80% of the prescribed protein dose was associated with lower mortality (Nicolo). Refeeding syndrome: definitions vary but centre on electrolyte disturbances within 72 hours — check phosphate/Mg/K before feeding and watch daily; once it develops, protocolised caloric restriction is the supported management (Doig: 91% vs 78% alive at day 60). Glutamine: REDOX showed harm in multi-organ failure — not routinely recommended. Gastric residual volume: not monitoring GRV at all was non-inferior for VAP (REGANE).

medium16 referencesUpdated 26 July 202615 min readSource-verified · Sept 2026

Checked against its sources on 3 Sept 2026

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

  • Refeeding syndrome: phosphate drops rapidly when feeding starts after starvation — check, replace, start slow
  • Do NOT chase full calories early — calorie restraint is safe (PermiT, EDEN) and extra calories do not help (TARGET)
  • Always give THIAMINE before starting feed in at-risk patients (alcoholics, malnourished)
  • A gastric residual volume number decides nothing — REGANE: not monitoring GRV at all was non-inferior for VAP; judge intolerance on vomiting and regurgitation
  • High NUTRIC = patient benefits most from adequate protein-calorie delivery; low NUTRIC = underfeeding tolerated
  • REDOX: high-dose glutamine may HARM in multi-organ failure — do NOT routinely supplement
  • Routine supplemental PN within the first week increases infection and prolongs ventilation (EPaNIC, PEPaNIC)
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

  • Refeeding syndrome: phosphate drops rapidly when feeding starts after starvation — check, replace, start slow
  • Do NOT chase full calories early — calorie restraint is safe (PermiT, EDEN) and extra calories do not help (TARGET)
  • Always give THIAMINE before starting feed in at-risk patients (alcoholics, malnourished)
  • A gastric residual volume number decides nothing — REGANE: not monitoring GRV at all was non-inferior for VAP; judge intolerance on vomiting and regurgitation
  • High NUTRIC = patient benefits most from adequate protein-calorie delivery; low NUTRIC = underfeeding tolerated
  • REDOX: high-dose glutamine may HARM in multi-organ failure — do NOT routinely supplement
  • Routine supplemental PN within the first week increases infection and prolongs ventilation (EPaNIC, PEPaNIC)
The one-line answer

Start enteral nutrition early — within 24 to 36 hours in the landmark trials — meet the protein prescription, hold calories back in week one, and never default to early parenteral nutrition. Route at matched calories is neutral (CALORIES: similar 30-day mortality with EN or PN); in shock, full-volume EN carries digestive risk (NUTRIREA-2); and supplemental PN in week one is harmful (EPaNIC: late PN meant fewer infections and less ventilation). Restricting calories to 40-60% of requirements with protein maintained was as safe as full feeding (PermiT). Screen for refeeding risk first: the syndrome declares itself mostly within 72 hours of starting nutrition, so check phosphate, magnesium and potassium before you feed and watch them daily. [6][7][4][5][2]

Meet the patient

A 49-year-old man with chronic alcohol dependence is admitted with aspiration pneumonia and sepsis, intubated and ventilated. He has eaten almost nothing for ten days; his BMI is 15.8, phosphate 0.55 mmol/L, magnesium 0.45 mmol/L, potassium 3.0 mmol/L. The registrar wants to hang full-strength feed at 50 mL/h to "meet his caloric target immediately". [13]

That one plan hides the two questions the whole topic turns on: when do I feed, and how fast? Get them right — early EN, restrained calories, electrolytes watched — and he comes through the week; get them wrong and he risks the precipitous electrolyte shifts of refeeding syndrome or the infections of premature PN. [2][4]

The mantra

Enteral early, protein to target, calories can wait — and never default to early parenteral nutrition. [8][5][4]

ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the ICU Fellowship (CICM) fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References16ShowHide
  1. [1]Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit Clin Nutr, 2019.PMID 30348463
  2. [2]Friedli N, Stanga Z, Sobotka L, et al. Revisiting the refeeding syndrome: Results of a systematic review Nutrition, 2017.PMID 28087222
  3. [3]Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Jiang X, et al. Identifying critically ill patients who benefit the most from nutrition therapy: the development and initial validation of a novel risk assessment tool Crit Care, 2011.PMID 22085763
  4. [4]Casaer MP, Mesotten D, Hermans G, et al. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults N Engl J Med, 2011.PMID 21714640
  5. [5]Arabi YM, Aldawood AS, Haddad SH, et al. Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults N Engl J Med, 2015.PMID 25992505
  6. [6]Harvey SE, Parrott F, Harrison DA, et al. Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 25271389
  7. [7]Reignier J, Boisramé-Helms J, Brisard L, et al. Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2) Lancet, 2018.PMID 29128300
  8. [8]Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, et al. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial JAMA, 2012.PMID 22307571
  9. [9]Heyland D, Muscedere J, Wischmeyer PE, et al. A randomized trial of glutamine and antioxidants in critically ill patients N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23594003
  10. [10]Chapman M, Peake SL, Bellomo R, et al. Energy-Dense versus Routine Enteral Nutrition in the Critically Ill N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 30346225
  11. [11]Fivez T, Kerklaan D, Mesotten D, et al. Early versus Late Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Children N Engl J Med, 2016.PMID 26975590
  12. [12]Reignier J, Mercier E, Le Gouge A, et al. Effect of not monitoring residual gastric volume on risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults receiving mechanical ventilation and early enteral feeding: a randomized controlled trial JAMA, 2013.PMID 23321763
  13. [13]Doig GS, Simpson F, Heighes PT, et al. Restricted versus continued standard caloric intake during the management of refeeding syndrome in critically ill adults: a randomised, parallel-group, multicentre, single-blind controlled trial Lancet Respir Med, 2015.PMID 26597128
  14. [14]Nicolo M, Heyland DK, Chittams J, et al. Clinical Outcomes Related to Protein Delivery in a Critically Ill Population: A Multicenter, Multinational Observation Study JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2016.PMID 25900319
  15. [15]Puthucheary ZA, Rawal J, McPhail M, et al. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness JAMA, 2013.PMID 24108501
  16. [16]Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19318384

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
ICU Fellowship (CICM) Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete ICU Fellowship (CICM) library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousIntra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndromeGI/NutritionNextStress Ulcer Prophylaxis (SUP) — Comprehensive ICU Managementgi-nutrition