ICU · Ethics
Acute severe community-acquired pneumonia: ICU handover and communication
Also known as ICU handover · Communication in ICU · SBAR handover · Clinical handover
Clinical handover is the transfer of professional responsibility and accountability for patient care from one clinician/team to another. Poor handover is a leading cause of preventable patient harm — the Joint Commission attributed the majority of sentinel events to communication breakdown, and the ANZICS CORE and ICNARC datasets repeatedly identify failed handover as a root-cause contributor to ICU morbidity. ICU handover contexts: shift change (nursing + medical), ICU-to-ward transfer, ED-to-ICU referral/upgrade, inter-hospital retrieval, weekend/holiday/long-weekend handover, and emergency/event handover (cardiac arrest, rapid response, deterioration). Structured tools: ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation — the ANZ standard with explicit identification step), SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation — the original Kaiser Permanente model), I-PASS (Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situation awareness with contingencies, Synthesis by receiver — most evidence-based, reduced medical errors 23% and preventable adverse events 30% in the NEJM 2014 trial), and ISOBAR (Identify, Situation, Observations, Background, Agreed plan, Read-back — Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care variant). Handover failure modes: missed information, wrong/duplicated/omitted medication, delayed investigation or treatment, loss of contingency plans, and absent situational awareness of the deteriorating patient. Critical-event communication techniques: closed-loop communication (sender → receiver reads back → sender confirms), read-back/verify-back of verbal orders and drug doses, and crew resource management (CRM) principles adapted from aviation. Principles of every handover: structured, concise, accurate, timely, documented in the medical record, with an explicit opportunity for questions and a synthesis/read-back step.
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- Poor handover = preventable patient harm. #1 cause of communication-related adverse events
- Inconsistent handover between staff = critical information lost
- Night shift handover: reduced staffing, fewer senior doctors = highest risk period
- Use SBAR or I-PASS structure for ALL handovers — not free-form
Meet the patient
It is 03:00. Your night registrar phones about a 58-year-old man, day 3 of ventilation for H1N1 pneumonitis and ARDS, who has been drifting all shift — the PaO2 over FiO2 ratio down from 180 to 95 on FiO2 0.9 and PEEP 14, lactate edging up, noradrenaline creeping in. The registrar says "she is not looking great, I think we should do something." The on-call consultant, woken from sleep, replies "OK, keep an eye on her, call me if worried." At 06:30 the patient has a PEA arrest.[2]
Two failures sit in that single exchange, and they are two exam will test: a handover with no structure, no acuity anchor, and no contingency, and a closed loop that never closed. The registrar never said how sick the patient was; the consultant never asked for a read-back; nobody wrote down a plan. Fix those two and you have fixed most of ICU communication.[1]
References4ShowHide
- [1]Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R, et al. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. The New England journal of medicine, 2014.PMID 25372088
- [2]Desmedt M, Ulenaers D, Grosemans J, et al. Clinical handover and handoff in healthcare: a systematic review of systematic reviews. International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2021.PMID 33325520
- [3]Haig KM, Sutton S, Whittington J. SBAR: a shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2006.PMID 16617948
- [4]De Meester K, Vermoere M, Vermeulen L, et al. SBAR improves nurse-physician communication and reduces unexpected death: a pre and post intervention study. Resuscitation, 2013.PMID 23537699