ATLS primary survey and trauma resuscitation

A 28-year-old motorcyclist arrives hypotensive, tachycardic and confused after a high-speed collision. In the next ten minutes your team will protect his airway, exclude a tension pneumothorax, find the bleeding, start blood and tranexamic acid, and decide whether he needs a CT scanner, an angiography suite or an operating theatre. Every one of those decisions — and the order in which you make them — is the primary survey, and every examiner in every fellowship trauma viva will take you through it. This page gives you the sequence with the numbers that now govern each letter.^[1]

Definition — what the primary survey is, and what it is not

The primary survey is the structured, repeated assessment that finds and treats immediately life-threatening injuries in order of lethality: Airway with cervical spine protection, Breathing and ventilation, Circulation with haemorrhage control, Disability (neurological status), Exposure and environment. The paediatric literature states the same sequence plainly — a patent airway with cervical spine immobilisation; breathing with immediate treatment of tension pneumothorax, open pneumothorax and massive haemothorax; circulatory compromise and shock; neurological status including signs of rising intracranial pressure; and exposure while preventing hypothermia — and the paediatric ABCDE is simply the adult sequence scaled down.^[41]

Two refinements separate the fellowship answer from the undergraduate one. First, the letters run in parallel, not in series: in an efficient trauma resuscitation the primary survey is viewed as more than simple ABCs, with multiple processes running simultaneously, and resuscitation should be goal-oriented with defined endpoints for airway management, vascular access and haemodynamic parameters.^[1] Second, the sequence is subordinate to physiology: where catastrophic external haemorrhage is present, bleeding control precedes airway — the <C>ABC reordering used by prehospital and military pathways — because exsanguination kills faster than obstruction. The joint NAEMSP/ACS-COT/ACEP position statement on traumatic circulatory arrest makes the same point at the extreme: emphasise identification of reversible causes of traumatic circulatory arrest and time-critical intervention.^[33]

The secondary survey is a different instrument: its purpose is to identify the non-life-threatening injuries that are not a priority in the primary survey but, if missed, carry long-term consequences — a structured head-to-toe examination performed only after resuscitation.^[43]

Trauma systems — field triage and team activation come before the door

The primary survey does not begin in the resuscitation bay; it begins with the decision about where the patient is taken. In the United States, injury is the leading cause of death for persons aged 1–44 years, and the CDC defines the prehospital destination decision as a formal process: field triage involves an assessment not only of the physiology and anatomy of injury but also of the mechanism of the injury and special patient and system considerations.^[6]

The decision scheme. The CDC guideline works in four steps — physiologic criteria, anatomic criteria, mechanism of injury, and special considerations. Step One is intended to allow rapid identification of critically injured patients by assessing level of consciousness and vital signs, and its triggers are exact: Glasgow Coma Scale ≤13, or SBP <90 mmHg, or respiratory rate <10 or >29 breaths per minute (<20 in an infant under 1 year), or need for ventilatory support.^[6] The special-considerations step carries the geriatric correction that examiners test: systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg in persons aged over 65 years represents shock, alongside anticoagulant use, pregnancy beyond 20 weeks and burns.^[6] The scheme is a living document: the 2021 National Guideline for the Field Triage of Injured Patients is the current revision, published with its supporting evidence in the trauma literature.^[7]

Does activation change outcomes? Honest answer: it changes process, and the mortality signal is unproven. Pre-hospital trauma team activation did not significantly affect 24-hour mortality when controlling for key covariates, but it significantly reduced time to emergency procedure (18.0 vs 27.0 minutes), CT (37.0 vs 42.0), blood transfusion (14.0 vs 28.0) and ED length of stay (101.0 vs 171.0 minutes).^[9] A 10-year database study likewise found no association between in-hospital mortality and trauma team activation after adjusting for mechanism and severity, though the activated group had higher ICU admission and longer stays.^[10]

Undertriage is the failure mode to name. Among patients with Injury Severity Score 25 or above who failed to meet activation criteria, severe undertriage occurred almost exclusively after blunt trauma (96% vs 71%), severe chest injuries were the injuries most likely to evade capture, and the undertriaged still needed intubation and emergent intervention at high rates, with 14% mortality.^[8] In children, activation criteria are wildly variable between hospitals, though nearly all (92%) use physiological factors.^[11]

Pathophysiology — the lethal triad and the compensation trap

Haemorrhagic shock begins with compensation and ends in a vicious cycle. Initially the body compensates for lost circulating volume; as haemorrhage continues, compensatory mechanisms fail and the patient's condition worsens significantly. Hypovolaemia then generates the lethal triad — hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy — three interlinked factors that worsen each other and, unless the cycle is broken, result in death.^[12] The triad is the intellectual frame for damage-control resuscitation: the historical "golden hour" drove unprecedented speed and short injury-to-incision times, and the modern "new golden hour" is the time in the operating room before the patient reaches physiological exhaustion.^[13]

Spontaneous hypothermia develops early in the injured patient and is a third of the triad — prehospital temperature control is part of resuscitation, not comfort care.^[12] Exposure at E is therefore simultaneously an examination step and a treatment step: look at everything, then cover and warm.

Assessment tools — the numbers that detect occult shock

Shock index. Heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure. HR and SBP often appear normal in the compensatory phase of shock and are confounded by medications, whereas a shock index over 1.0 has been widely found to predict increased mortality, massive transfusion protocol activation and ICU admission.^[15] In blunt thoracic trauma specifically, SI was an independent predictor of mortality with an odds ratio of 3.506 (95% CI 1.894–6.489) and predicted chest intervention and transfusion.^[16] In children the same ratio is age-adjusted: the SIPA calculates the shock index adjusted for age to predict mortality.^[17]

ABC score. Four parameters, one point each: penetrating mechanism, positive FAST for fluid, arrival blood pressure under 90 mmHg, arrival pulse over 120 beats per minute; a score of 2 is positive. Validated across three Level I centres, the ABC score predicted massive transfusion with sensitivity 75–90% and specificity 67–88%, correctly classifying 84–87% of patients.^[18]

^{[15] [18] [6] [21]}

A — Airway with cervical spine protection

The airway question is binary: patent or not, and if not, what are you doing about it. Every airway manoeuvre happens under manual in-line stabilisation of the cervical spine; the paediatric formulation — establishment and maintenance of a patent airway while maintaining cervical spine immobilisation — is the cleanest statement of the pairing.^[41] Resuscitation should be goal-oriented with a defined endpoint for airway management: the decision is not "is the airway okay" but "does this patient need a definitive airway now, and what is my plan when the first attempt fails".^[1]

B — Breathing, and the needle decompression evidence

The three chest killers sought at B are tension pneumothorax, open pneumothorax and massive haemothorax, and they are treated as found, not after imaging.^[41] Tension pneumothorax is a clinical diagnosis; the immediate recommended management is needle decompression followed by intercostal chest drain insertion.^[19]

The 2025 meta-analysis behind the current debate pooled radiological data from 24 studies (8,046 patients) and found a 32.84% failure rate for needle decompression — roughly one in three needles does not work — with every additional centimetre of needle length reducing failure by 7.76%. Chest wall thickness was less at the 5th intercostal space (anterior and midaxillary lines) than at the 2nd midclavicular line, and injury rates were higher at the 5th anterior axillary line, correlating with needle length. The synthesis: a 7 cm needle may be appropriate at either the 5th intercostal space midaxillary line or the 2nd midclavicular line for the right side, but for left-sided decompression the 2nd midclavicular line is preferred given the risk of cardiac injury. ATLS and the European Trauma Course still differ on needle size and site, which is precisely why this evidence matters.^[19]

C — Circulation with haemorrhage control

External haemorrhage — tourniquets with judgement

Extremity tourniquets are lifesaving in civilian and military settings and remain the first responder's tool for life-threatening extremity bleeding — but not every extremity wound needs one, and recognising what magnitude of bleeding requires a tourniquet is itself a core skill.^[25] The evidence of overuse is uncomfortable: in a civilian prehospital series of 211 tourniquets, 63.2% had no other intervention attempted before placement, nearly a third of limbs arrived with palpable pulses distal to the tourniquet, and fewer than half had arterial bleeding when the tourniquet was released.^[26] And underuse is not the only harm: the Russo-Ukrainian war has produced unnecessary loss of extremities and life-threatening prolonged tourniquet application syndrome from non-indicated tourniquets combined with prolonged evacuation.^[25]

Tranexamic acid — the clock-dependent drug

CRASH-2 randomised 20,211 adult trauma patients with, or at risk of, significant bleeding in 274 hospitals across 40 countries to tranexamic acid — loading dose 1 g over 10 minutes then infusion of 1 g over 8 hours — or placebo within 8 hours of injury. All-cause mortality fell from 16.0% to 14.5% (relative risk 0.91, 95% CI 0.85–0.97), and death due to bleeding fell from 5.7% to 4.9% (RR 0.85, 0.76–0.96).^[20]

The exploratory timing analysis is the part examiners make you quote. The effect on death due to bleeding varied with time from injury (interaction p < 0.0001): treatment within 1 hour gave RR 0.68 (5.3% vs 7.7%), treatment between 1 and 3 hours gave RR 0.79 (4.8% vs 6.1%), and treatment after 3 hours seemed to increase the risk of death due to bleeding (4.4% vs 3.1%; RR 1.44, 1.12–1.84). The trialists' own interpretation: give it as early as possible; in late presenters it is less effective and could be harmful.^[21]

Blood, ratios and oxygen

PROPPR randomised 680 severely injured patients predicted to need massive transfusion to plasma:platelets:red cells in 1:1:1 versus 1:1:2. Mortality at 24 hours and 30 days did not differ significantly, but exsanguination — the predominant cause of death in the first 24 hours — fell with 1:1:1 (9.2% vs 14.6%), and more patients achieved anatomical haemostasis (86% vs 78%).^[22] Prehospital blood has military cohort support: among 502 combat casualties evacuated in Afghanistan, prehospital transfusion recipients had 24-hour mortality of 5% versus 19% in non-recipients, and 30-day mortality 11% versus 23%.^[23]

Oxygen is the newest randomised answer in the bay: TRAUMOX2 randomised 1,979 adult trauma patients to an early 8-hour restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategy and found no difference — death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days occurred in 16.1% restrictive versus 16.7% liberal (OR 1.01).^[24]

The pelvis — binder first, then the hard decisions

WSES frames pelvic trauma management around the patient, not the fracture: the optimal strategy must consider the haemodynamic status, the anatomic impairment of pelvic ring function and the associated injuries, and management is multidisciplinary.^[27] The pelvic binder is the universal first mechanical step — but its evidence base is thin. A 2025 systematic review of early binder application found no clear superiority over late or no binder for blood product requirement, mortality, pain or complications: overall mortality was 17.4% in binder groups versus 15.7% in no/late-binder groups, and the authors call for re-evaluation of widespread use and better trials.^[28] Use it — the downside is small and the physiology is sound — but say in the viva that you know the evidence is weak.

REBOA and resuscitative thoracotomy — the salvage end of C

For the profoundly hypotensive or pulseless patient, salvage strategies include retrograde balloon occlusion of the aorta and resuscitative thoracotomy, with different populations benefiting from each.^[1] The REBOA evidence has inverted within five years, and you must be able to narrate the inversion. The 2021 meta-analysis suggested REBOA was associated with lower mortality than resuscitative thoracotomy (adjusted OR 0.38, 0.20–0.74) but no difference versus no-REBOA (aOR 1.40), with amputation, haematoma and pseudoaneurysm the commonest complications.^[29] Then came UK-REBOA, the first randomised trial: 90 patients with life-threatening torso haemorrhage, and 90-day mortality was higher with standard care plus REBOA than standard care alone (54% vs 42%; OR 1.58, posterior probability of harm 86.9%).^[31] EAST's 2025 practice management guideline followed: considering the risks and the lack of discernible benefit, it conditionally recommends against REBOA in trauma patients haemodynamically unstable from suspected subdiaphragmatic haemorrhage, while conditionally recommending it in traumatic cardiac arrest from subdiaphragmatic bleeding and for prophylactic placement in placenta accreta spectrum.^[30]

D — Disability

Disability is the rapid neurological quantification: level of consciousness on the Glasgow Coma Scale, pupils, and lateralising signs, with the paediatric framing explicitly adding assessment for signs of raised intracranial pressure and impending herniation.^[41] The GCS has a second life upstream in triage: the CDC Step One threshold that routes a patient to a trauma centre is a GCS of 13 or below.^[6] D is also where the survey repeats itself — a falling GCS during resuscitation is a new primary survey, not a note for later.

E — Exposure with warming

Expose completely, then cover: the letter exists to find what the mechanism hides — posterior wounds, perineal bleeding, the missed second injury — while actively preventing the hypothermia that is a third of the lethal triad.^[12][41]

Investigations at the bedside — eFAST and the imaging decision

eFAST is the primary survey's imaging adjunct: a rapid, non-invasive, radiation-free free-fluid detection technique across the anatomical windows of chest and abdomen, performed during resuscitation, that identifies haemoperitoneum, haemothorax and cardiac tamponade and is accepted as the initial diagnostic tool for torso injuries in blunt abdominal trauma — reliable even in non-radiologist hands.^[35] The Cochrane review adds the discipline: specificity is high but sensitivity has varied markedly across studies, so a negative eFAST does not exclude bleeding.^[36] For pneumothorax specifically, ultrasound is gaining acceptance as an accurate bedside tool, but not all ultrasound-detected pneumothoraces are clinically significant — the purpose-built study of diagnostic inaccuracies evaluated ultrasound's ability to predict pneumothoraces that actually need a tube.^[34]

CT is a destination decision, not a reflex. REACT-2 randomised 1,403 severely injured patients to immediate total-body CT versus conventional imaging with selective CT and found no difference in in-hospital mortality (16% vs 16%), nor in the polytrauma or traumatic brain injury subgroups — with more radiation. The conclusion that should shape your answer: diagnosing with immediate total-body CT does not reduce mortality, so selection of who benefits is the live question.^[37] The bridging principle from the resuscitation literature: early identification of life-threatening injuries during the survey determines disposition when the patient leaves the trauma bay — CT, angiography or theatre.^[1]

The differential of the shocked trauma patient

Shock in the trauma bay is haemorrhagic until proven otherwise, but the primary survey must actively exclude the obstructive and neurogenic mimics. Tension pneumothorax and cardiac tamponade are the two obstructive killers distinguishable at B and on the eFAST cardiac window — tamponade is one of the three findings eFAST exists to catch.^[35] In the arrested patient the reversible causes are codified as HOTT: hypovolaemia, oxygenation (hypoxia), tension pneumothorax and cardiac tamponade, treated immediately and simultaneously rather than sequentially; survival with good neurological recovery is possible when this is done.^[32] A transient responder who re-deteriorates after fluid is bleeding faster than you are replacing — that pattern is an operative indication, not a diagnostic puzzle.

Traumatic cardiac arrest — HOTT, then the big interventions

Traumatic cardiac arrest is not medical arrest with a different label. When the aetiology is unclear, standard BLS/ACLS is appropriate; but traumatic circulatory arrest results from massive haemorrhage, airway obstruction, obstructive shock and respiratory disturbance, and its management is simultaneous correction of reversible causes per pre-established algorithms.^[33][32] Resuscitative thoracotomy and REBOA sit at the far end as advanced interventions, and the EAST guideline's conditional endorsement of REBOA applies specifically to arrest from suspected subdiaphragmatic bleeding — not to the merely unstable.^[32][30]

Special scenarios and populations

Penetrating neck injury. After initial resuscitation on ATLS principles, management depends on stability: unstable patients or those with hard signs go to theatre; stable patients without hard signs undergo multidetector CT angiography regardless of zone — the traditional zonal algorithm has been displaced by imaging.^[38]

Pregnancy. Trauma affects 1 in 12 pregnant women and drives maternal mortality, morbidity and pregnancy outcome; the approach is multidisciplinary, and maternal resuscitation is fetal resuscitation.^[39] The EAST practice management guideline gives the sequencing answer examiners want: in viable pregnancies, fetal assessment is performed at the end of the primary survey, after rapid maternal evaluation (conditional recommendation), fetal monitoring where indicated spans at least 4–6 hours, ionizing radiation concerns should not prevent medically indicated imaging, and Kleihauer-Betke testing is performed in Rh-negative patients to dose Rh D immunoglobulin.^[40]

Children. The ABCDE sequence is unchanged; what changes is calibration. Shock index must be age-adjusted (SIPA), the paediatric haemorrhagic shock consensus conference produced 21 recommendations across blood products, prehospital care and monitoring because high-quality evidence is scarce, and activation criteria vary widely between centres even though 92% are physiology-based.^[17][42][11]

The elderly. The triage threshold moves before the patient does: SBP under 110 mmHg over 65 is the CDC special-consideration trigger, anticoagulant use is a named Step Four criterion, and severe undertriage is overwhelmingly a blunt-trauma phenomenon — the low-energy mechanism that hides a severe injury pattern.^[6][8]

Pitfalls, quality and the education evidence

Pitfalls to name unprompted. Needle decompression failure (32.84%) and left-sided cardiac injury risk; eFAST false negatives for bleeding and false-positive insignificant pneumothoraces; tourniquets that were never needed and the limbs lost to them; hypothermia allowed to take hold during a leisurely exposure; and the undertriaged blunt elderly patient who never met a criterion.^{[19][36][34][25][12][8]}

How long should it take? Videotaped audit gives the benchmark: median recorded trauma resuscitation time was approximately 43 minutes whether or not a prehospital mobile medical team attended — a useful reality check against viva bravado about ten-minute surveys.^[4] Leadership matters measurably: strong leadership improves the speed and completion of the primary and secondary surveys, and the effective style is situational — directive leadership works best when injury severity is high or the team inexperienced, empowering leadership when severity is low or the team experienced.^[44]

Does ATLS itself work? The systematic review answers with levels of evidence: level I evidence that ATLS significantly improves knowledge, clinical skills and organisational/priority approach in managing multiple-trauma patients; level II-1 evidence that knowledge and skills decline after 6 months, maximally by 2 years; but organisation and priority skills persist up to 8 years.^[2] Patient-level data exist too: in the Dutch pre/post study, 10 of 14 interventions were performed qualitatively better after ATLS training, with the overall score significantly improved (4.2 vs 5.8).^[3] And the delivery model is modernising without losing effect: hybrid ATLS (asynchronous online modules plus a shortened in-person session) maintained learner outcomes, with the hybrid cohort actually improving more from a lower pretest baseline across 649 learners.^[5]

Revision summary

• The primary survey is parallel and goal-oriented, not serial ABCD; catastrophic external haemorrhage justifies <C>ABC.^[1][33]
• Field triage Step One: GCS ≤13, SBP <90, RR <10 or >29 — and SBP <110 over 65; undertriage is a blunt-trauma, chest-injury phenomenon.^[6][8]
• Shock index >1.0 and an ABC score of 2 are your occult-shock tripwires; SIPA in children.^[15][18][17]
• Needle decompression fails a third of the time; 7 cm, and prefer 2nd midclavicular on the left.^[19]
• TXA 1 g over 10 min then 1 g over 8 h, within 3 h — RR 0.68 within an hour, harm after three.^[20][21]
• PROPPR 1:1:1 cut exsanguination (9.2% vs 14.6%); prehospital blood saved lives in the Afghan cohort; TRAUMOX2 found restrictive and liberal oxygen equal.^[22][23][24]
• Binders are reflexive but evidence-thin; REBOA lost its first RCT and EAST now conditionally recommends against it in unstable subdiaphragmatic bleeding.^[28][31][30]
• eFAST is specific, not reliably sensitive; REACT-2 says total-body CT does not save lives — select, don't reflex.^[36][37]
• In arrest think HOTT, simultaneously; in pregnancy, mother first, fetal assessment at the end of the primary survey.^[32][40]

References44ShowHide

1. [1]Gondek S, Schroeder ME, Sarani B Assessment and Resuscitation in Trauma Management. Surg Clin North Am, 2017.PMID 28958368
2. [2]Mohammad A, Branicki F, Abu-Zidan FM Educational and clinical impact of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses: a systematic review. World J Surg, 2014.PMID 24136720
3. [3]van Olden GD, Meeuwis JD, Bolhuis HW, Boxma H, et al. Advanced trauma life support study: quality of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. J Trauma, 2004.PMID 15345989
4. [4]van Olden GD, van Vugt AB, Biert J, Goris RJ Trauma resuscitation time. Injury, 2003.PMID 12623249
5. [5]Mathai S, Wolverton R, Hildebrand R, Jenson W Hybrid Delivery of ATLS Maintains Learner Outcomes. J Surg Educ, 2026.PMID 41576561
6. [6]Sasser SM, Hunt RC, Faul M, Sugerman D, et al. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2012.PMID 22237112
7. [7]Newgard CD, Fischer PE, Gestring M, Michaels HN, et al. National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2021. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2022.PMID 35475939
8. [8]Anderson K, Schellenberg M, Owattanapanich N, Dunkelberger L, et al. Undertriage of Severely Injured Trauma Patients. Am Surg, 2023.PMID 37259503
9. [9]Durr K, Ho M, Lebreton M, Goltz D, et al. Evaluating the impact of pre-hospital trauma team activation criteria. CJEM, 2023.PMID 37938515
10. [10]Chien DS, Yiang GT, Liu CY, Tzeng IS, et al. Association of In-Hospital Mortality and Trauma Team Activation: A 10-Year Study. Diagnostics (Basel), 2022.PMID 36292022
11. [11]Drendel AL, Gray MP, Lerner EB, et al. A Systematic Review of Hospital Trauma Team Activation Criteria for Children. Pediatr Emerg Care, 2019.PMID 30608908
12. [12]Moffatt SE Hypothermia in trauma. Emerg Med J, 2013.PMID 23243045
13. [13]Mikhail J The trauma triad of death: hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy. AACN Clin Issues, 1999.PMID 10347389
14. [14]Lerner EB, Moscati RM The golden hour: scientific fact or medical "urban legend"? Acad Emerg Med, 2001.PMID 11435197
15. [15]Koch E, Lovett S, Nghiem T, Riggs RA, et al. Shock index in the emergency department: utility and limitations. Open Access Emerg Med, 2019.PMID 31616192
16. [16]Asim M, El-Menyar A, Chughtai T, Al-Hassani A, et al. Shock Index for the Prediction of Interventions and Mortality in Patients With Blunt Thoracic Trauma. J Surg Res, 2023.PMID 36434840
17. [17]Hietanen C Calculated decisions: Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA). Pediatr Emerg Med Pract, 2020.PMID 31978297
18. [18]Cotton BA, Dossett LA, Haut ER, Shafi S, et al. Multicenter validation of a simplified score to predict massive transfusion in trauma. J Trauma, 2010.PMID 20622617
19. [19]Ahmad SJS, Degiannis JR, Head M, Ahmed AR Meta-analysis of the optimal needle length and decompression site for tension pneumothorax and consensus recommendations on current ATLS and ETC guidelines. World J Emerg Surg, 2025.PMID 40383767
20. [20]Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, et al. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2010.PMID 20554319
21. [21]Roberts I, Shakur H, Afolabi A, et al. The importance of early treatment with tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2011.PMID 21439633
22. [22]Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, Fox EE, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2015.PMID 25647203
23. [23]Shackelford SA, Del Junco DJ, Powell-Dunford N, Mazuchowski EL, et al. Association of Prehospital Blood Product Transfusion During Medical Evacuation of Combat Casualties in Afghanistan With Acute and 30-Day Survival. JAMA, 2017.PMID 29067429
24. [24]Arleth T, Baekgaard J, Siersma V, Creutzburg A, et al. Early Restrictive vs Liberal Oxygen for Trauma Patients: The TRAUMOX2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2025.PMID 39657224
25. [25]Butler F, Holcomb JB, Dorlac W, Gurney J, et al. Who needs a tourniquet? And who does not? Lessons learned from a review of tourniquet use in the Russo-Ukrainian war. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2024.PMID 38996420
26. [26]Gushing J, Blair SG, Albrecht RM, Sawar Z, et al. Prehospital tourniquet placement in extremity trauma. Am J Surg, 2023.PMID 37596184
27. [27]Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G, Biffl W, et al. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg, 2017.PMID 28115984
28. [28]Papaleontiou A, Poupard AM, Parker P Are pelvic binders an effective measure to lower mortality and decrease blood loss after high energy pelvic ring injuries? A systematic review. Surgeon, 2025.PMID 40957825
29. [29]Castellini G, Gianola S, Biffi A, Porcu G, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in patients with major trauma and uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock: a systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg, 2021.PMID 34384452
30. [30]Harfouche MN, Bugaev N, Como JJ, Fraser DR, et al. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in surgical and trauma patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 2025.PMID 40166770
31. [31]Jansen JO, Hudson J, Kennedy C, Cochran C, et al. The UK resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma patients with life-threatening torso haemorrhage: the (UK-REBOA) multicentre RCT. Health Technol Assess, 2024.PMID 39259521
32. [32]Carenzo L, Calgaro G, Rehn M, Perkins Z, et al. Contemporary management of traumatic cardiac arrest and peri-arrest states: a narrative review. J Anesth Analg Crit Care, 2024.PMID 39327636
33. [33]Breyre AM, George N, Nelson AR, Ingram CJ, et al. Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Prehospital Management of Adults with Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Circulatory Arrest - A Joint Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP, ACS-COT, and ACEP. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2025.PMID 40068140
34. [34]Butts CC, Cline D, Pariyadath M, Avery MD, et al. Diagnostic Inaccuracies Using Extended Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma for Traumatic Pneumothorax. Am Surg, 2023.PMID 35435007
35. [35]Bella FM, Bonfichi A, Esposito C, Zanza C, et al. Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in the Emergency Department: A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Med, 2025.PMID 40429451
36. [36]Stengel D, Leisterer J, Ferrada P, Ekkernkamp A, et al. Point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosing thoracoabdominal injuries in patients with blunt trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018.PMID 30548249
37. [37]Sierink JC, Treskes K, Edwards MJ, Beuker BJ, et al. Immediate total-body CT scanning versus conventional imaging and selective CT scanning in patients with severe trauma (REACT-2): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2016.PMID 27371185
38. [38]Nowicki JL, Stew B, Ooi E Penetrating neck injuries: a guide to evaluation and management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2018.PMID 29046084
39. [39]Jain V, Chari R, Maslovitz S, Farine D, et al. Guidelines for the Management of a Pregnant Trauma Patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2015.PMID 26334607
40. [40]Appelbaum RD, Yorkgitis B, Rosen J, Butts CA, et al. Trauma in pregnancy: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2025.PMID 40454982
41. [41]Jafarpour S, Nassiri SJ, Bidari A, Chardoli M Principles of primary survey and resuscitation in cases of pediatric trauma. Acta Med Iran, 2014.PMID 25530060
42. [42]Russell RT, Esparaz JR, Beckwith MA, Abraham PJ, et al. Pediatric traumatic hemorrhagic shock consensus conference recommendations. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2023.PMID 36245074
43. [43]Mc Auley C, Mullen S, Corley L, McDonald R, et al. Secondary survey in paediatric trauma. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed, 2023.PMID 36863856
44. [44]Ford K, Menchine M, Burner E, Arora S, et al. Leadership and Teamwork in Trauma and Resuscitation. West J Emerg Med, 2016.PMID 27625718