Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

EM SAQsMandatory reporting and child protection

EM SAQs · Mandatory reporting and child protection

The bruised non-mobile infant

ACEM-style SAQ on sentinel injury recognition and mandatory reporting.

10 marks10 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
A 7-week-old infant is brought with a single bruise on the thigh. Parents say the infant rolled from a change table. Outline your assessment, the features that raise concern for non-accidental injury, the investigations you would consider, and the mandatory reporting and disposition pathway. (10 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answerShowHide

Concern features: non-mobile infant; any bruise under 4 months is a TEN-4 positive component; rolling at 7 weeks is developmentally implausible; delayed presentation if present; changing history.[1]

Assessment: full undressed examination (scalp, frenulum, ears, genitalia, back); growth chart; developmental assessment; careful contemporaneous documentation with body map; senior involvement early.[1]

Investigations (protocolised): consider skeletal survey (age <2 with suspected physical abuse), CT head as indicated, ophthalmology if intracranial injury concern, coagulation/FBC to assess mimics — investigations support medical care and forensics, they do not replace notification.[1]

Mandatory reporting: notify statutory child protection on reasonable suspicion; duty overrides confidentiality; strategy discussion with social work; do not collude or confront in a way that destroys evidence/trust carelessly.[3]

Disposition: safety plan — home only if child protection and senior team agree safe; otherwise place of safety; assess siblings; arrange follow-up medical and safeguarding tracks.[3]

Emergency Medicine Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Emergency Medicine fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References3ShowHide
  1. [1]Pierce MC, et al. Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule to Predict Abuse in Young Children Based on Bruising Characteristics. JAMA Network Open, 2021.PMID 33852003
  2. [2]Adams JA, Kellogg ND, Farst KJ, Harper NS, Palusci VJ, Frasier LD, Levitt CJ, Shapiro RA, Moles RL, Starling SP. Updated Guidelines for the Medical Assessment and Care of Children Who May Have Been Sexually Abused. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 2016.PMID 26220352
  3. [3]Christian CW, et al. The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics, 2015.PMID 25917988
Emergency Medicine Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Emergency Medicine library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousThe broad-complex tachycardiaPeri-arrest arrhythmiasNextThe button battery in the nose — a paediatric time-critical emergencyForeign body removal