EM SAQs · Foreign body removal
The button battery in the nose — a paediatric time-critical emergency
An ACEM-style SAQ on the paediatric nasal button battery — the time-critical emergency that every Fellowship candidate must recognise. The electrolysis mechanism, the double-rim sign on X-ray, the prompt removal, the saline irrigation to clear the alkaline residue, and the delayed-perforation ENT review are the tested points.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
ACEMFRCEMABEM
Prompt
A 3-year-old girl is brought to the emergency department by her parents, who noticed a foul smell from her right nostril and a small amount of blood-stained discharge over the past 24 hours. The parents report that the child was playing with a remote control three days ago and a button battery is now missing. On examination the child is alert and afebrile, with crusted blood at the right nares and a shiny metallic disk visible on anterior rhinoscopy resting against the nasal septum. An X-ray confirms a round object with a step-off rim and a double-ring halo sign. (a) State the diagnosis, the mechanism of injury, and the urgency of the management (3 marks). (b) Outline the immediate ED management, including the technique of removal and the post-removal care (6 marks). (c) Discuss the complications and the disposition, including the delayed review (4 marks). (d) Explain how the X-ray distinguishes this object from a coin, and the significance of the duration of retention (2 marks).
Model answer
Reveal model answerShowHide
(a) Diagnosis, mechanism, and urgency (3 marks).
- The diagnosis is a button battery retained in the right nasal cavity for approximately three days — the foul smell, the blood-stained discharge, and the visible metallic disk against the septum, confirmed by the halo sign on the X-ray, are diagnostic.
- The mechanism of injury is electrolysis — the battery, lodged against the mucosal surface of the septum, drives an electrolytic current through the tissue fluid. At the negative pole, electrolysis generates hydroxide, producing a locally alkaline environment that liquefies the tissue. This is an alkaline liquefactive necrosis — every lodged ear or nose battery in the reported series produced tissue destruction, including septal perforation and canal necrosis with exposed bone.[4]
- The urgency is time-critical — the necrosis progresses within hours and continues after removal. A button battery in the nose is removed promptly, never observed. Three days of retention far exceeds the reported median impaction of 4 hours; in a 10-year series of 45 children, late septal perforation reached 18% against 4.4% early, so delayed structural injury must be assumed.[1][4]
(b) Immediate ED management, the removal technique, and the post-removal care (6 marks).
- Position and immobilise the child — upright on a parent's lap with the bear-hug hold, or in a papoose; consider procedural sedation (ketamine 1 to 1.5 mg/kg intravenously or 4 mg/kg intramuscularly) for the uncooperative child to allow a single best attempt.[6][7][8]
- Anaesthetise and vasoconstrict — place a cotton pledget soaked in topical lidocaine with a vasoconstrictor in the right nostril to anaesthetise the mucosa and shrink the turbinate.
- Remove under direct vision with the headlamp and the nasal speculum — grasp the battery with the alligator forceps at the rim (taking care not to push it deeper), or pass a right-angle hook behind the battery and lever it forward. Never irrigate blindly — fluid provides an electrolyte bath that enhances the electrolytic current and hydroxide formation.
- Irrigate the cavity with saline after removal to clear the alkaline residue and reduce the ongoing injury.
- Inspect both nostrils for a second FB, and assess the septum for the extent of the mucosal injury and any exposed cartilage.
- Post-removal care — analgesia and refer immediately to ENT for endoscopic assessment; saline irrigation is the commonest reported post-removal care with topical mupirocin also commonly used; do not discharge without an ENT review of the septal injury, since two in five children historically left with no follow-up plan.[1][4]
(c) Complications and disposition (4 marks).
- The acute complications are the mucosal eschar and necrosis, the septal perforation (the alkaline necrosis erodes through the cartilage), and the epistaxis from the mucosal slough — eschar in 44.4%, necrosis in 31% and early perforation in 4.4% in the reported series.
- The delayed complications include the late septal perforation (18% — a fourfold rise from early evaluation) and persistent symptoms among those followed: nasal discharge (44.4%), obstruction (17%) and epistaxis (12%).
- The disposition is admission or observation for the septal assessment, definite ENT follow-up for the delayed perforation review, and parental counselling on the long-term outlook — post-removal care varies considerably and low follow-up rates are a critical gap in management.
- The safety-net — return for any epistaxis, fever, obstruction, or visible deformity.[1]
(d) The X-ray distinction and the duration of retention (2 marks).
- A button battery on X-ray shows the double-rim (halo) sign on the anteroposterior view — reliable in batteries 20 mm and above — and a step-off on the lateral view, visible in batteries of all diameters. A coin shows a homogeneous density at all angles. The two-view X-ray (anteroposterior and lateral) distinguishes them, though a pot magnet can simulate the double-rim sign.[5]
- The duration of retention is the key prognostic variable — the reported median impaction is only 4 hours, yet late perforation still reached 18%; three days of retention (as here) mandates assuming delayed structural injury. The mechanism continues after removal because the alkali is already in the tissue; hence the saline irrigation and the ENT review.[1][5]
References8ShowHide
- [1]Heilig Y, Tsarfati Y, Gete M, et al. Long-term outcomes following nasal button battery foreign body injuries in children: a 10-year retrospective analysis of 45 patients. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2026.PMID 41985339
- [2]Carneiro BC, Cruz IAN, Chemin RN, et al. Multimodality Imaging of Foreign Bodies: New Insights into Old Challenges. RadioGraphics, 2020.PMID 33136481
- [3]Morris S, Osborne MS, McDermott AL Will children ever learn? Removal of nasal and aural foreign bodies: a study of hospital episode statistics Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018.PMID 29968507
- [4]Kavanagh KT, Litovitz T Miniature battery foreign bodies in auditory and nasal cavities JAMA, 1986.PMID 3951081
- [5]Meyer TJ, Grunz JP, Taeger J, et al. Systematic analysis of button batteries', euro coins', and disk magnets' radiographic characteristics and the implications for the differential diagnosis of round radiopaque foreign bodies in the esophagus International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2020.PMID 32032915
- [6]Roback MG, Wathen JE, MacKenzie T, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of i.v. versus i.m. ketamine for sedation of pediatric patients receiving emergency department orthopedic procedures Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2006.PMID 17052563
- [7]Heilbrunn BR, Chang TP, Liu DR A retrospective comparison of ketamine dosing regimens for pediatric procedural sedation European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2015.PMID 25706045
- [8]Gharavifard M, Boroumand Reza Zadeh B, et al. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Intravenous and Intramuscular Ketamine for Pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia Emergency (Tehran), 2015.PMID 26495383