Psych · Forensic psychiatry — sexual offending
Sexual offending
Also known as Sexual offender assessment · Sex offender risk assessment · Static-99R · STABLE-2007 ACUTE-2007 · Sexual recidivism · Paraphilic disorders forensic · Child sexual offending psychiatry · Motivation facilitation model · WFSBP paraphilic treatment · Forensic sex offence treatment
Exam-exhaustive fellowship reference on sexual offending for forensic psychiatry — legal vs clinical constructs; pedophilia vs child sexual offending; motivation–facilitation model; static/dynamic/protective risk (Static-99R, STABLE/ACUTE concepts); multi-source assessment; RNR-informed psychological treatment; WFSBP-aligned pharmacotherapy principles for high-risk paraphilic pathways; multi-agency public protection; ethics. Clinical and non-sensational. FRANZCP-primary, globally tagged.
Practise this topic
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Target exams
Red flags
- Identifiable child or named person with ongoing access and unsupervised contact — treat as imminent public-protection priority; multi-agency action per local law
- New victim access, relationship rupture, or substance relapse during community supervision — reassess dynamic risk before leave or step-down continues
- Suicidality after arrest, disclosure, or media exposure — manage acute suicide risk in parallel with forensic duties
- Requests for antiandrogen or GnRH 'chemical restraint' without capacity/consent process, medical baseline, or specialist monitoring plan
- Collusion with secrecy that leaves children unprotected — confidentiality has limits when identifiable children are at risk
- Incomplete index-offence file for court or tribunal opinion — do not finalise risk opinion until primary sources are reviewed
Meet the patient
A 38-year-old man is referred two weeks before sentencing for a contact sexual offence against a child outside his family. He minimises, blames alcohol, and asks you to "sign something saying I am not a paedophile." The index brief is thin. A named child still has unsupervised access through a relative who does not know of the conviction.[5][15]
Two live exam questions sit inside that referral. "Is he a paedophile?" — you cannot answer that from a behaviour alone. "What do you do about the child tonight, before any report is written?" This topic is the structured, safeguarding-first answer to both.[1][15]
References18ShowHide
- [1]Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies J Consult Clin Psychol, 2005.PMID 16392988
- [2]Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies Psychol Assess, 2009.PMID 19290762
- [3]Hanson RK, Thornton D, Helmus LM, et al. What Sexual Recidivism Rates Are Associated With Static-99R and Static-2002R Scores? Sex Abuse, 2016.PMID 25810478
- [4]Mann RE, Hanson RK, Thornton D Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors Sex Abuse, 2010.PMID 20363981
- [5]Seto MC The Motivation-Facilitation Model of Sexual Offending Sex Abuse, 2019.PMID 28715948
- [6]Thibaut F, De La Barra F, Gordon H, et al. The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the biological treatment of paraphilias World J Biol Psychiatry, 2010.PMID 20459370
- [7]Thibaut F, Cosyns P, Fedoroff JP, et al. The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) 2020 guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of paraphilic disorders World J Biol Psychiatry, 2020.PMID 32452729
- [8]Assumpção AA, Garcia FD, Garcia HD, et al. Pharmacologic treatment of paraphilias Psychiatr Clin North Am, 2014.PMID 24877704
- [9]de Vries Robbé M, de Vogel V, Koster K, et al. Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF Sex Abuse, 2015.PMID 25210106
- [10]De Vries Robbé M, de Vogel V, Douglas KS, et al. Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism Law Hum Behav, 2015.PMID 24933171
- [11]Cartwright JK, Desmarais SL, Hazel J, et al. Predictive validity of HCR-20, START, and static-99R assessments in predicting institutional aggression among sexual offenders Law Hum Behav, 2018.PMID 28857580
- [12]Babchishin KM, Dibayula S, McCulloch C, et al. ACUTE-2007 and STABLE-2007 predict recidivism for men adjudicated for child sexual exploitation material offending Law Hum Behav, 2023.PMID 37616071
- [13]Buchanan A Risk of violence by psychiatric patients: beyond the "actuarial versus clinical" assessment debate Psychiatr Serv, 2008.PMID 18245161
- [14]Fazel S, Singh JP, Doll H, et al. Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ, 2012.PMID 22833604
- [15]Large MM, Ryan CJ, Nielssen OB Helpful and unhelpful risk assessment practices Psychiatr Serv, 2010.PMID 20439381
- [16]Gregório Hertz P, Eher R, Etzler S, et al. Cross-Validation of the Revised Version of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a Sample of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses Sex Abuse, 2021.PMID 31010400
- [17]Dyck HL, Campbell MA, Wershler JL Real-world use of the risk-need-responsivity model and the level of service/case management inventory with community-supervised offenders Law Hum Behav, 2018.PMID 29620397
- [18]Krueger RB, Reed GM, First MB, et al. Proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Eleventh Revision (ICD-11) Arch Sex Behav, 2017.PMID 28210933