Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Psych MEQs / SAQsPublic and community psychiatry — collaborative care and primary care

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Public and community psychiatry — collaborative care and primary care

Collaborative care — principles to multimorbidity implementation (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ on collaborative care design: principles, roles, measurement, landmark trials, implementation, escalation.

20 marks20 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A primary health network asks you, as consultant psychiatrist, to design collaborative care for depression and anxiety across 12 general practices. GPs currently refer only crisis patients; many adults with PHQ-9 of 12–18 receive a single SSRI script without follow-up. (i) Define collaborative care and distinguish it from co-location. (ii) Name the three core roles and five principles. (iii) Outline measurement-based care including PHQ-9/GAD-7 use and red flags. (iv) Summarise landmark evidence (IMPACT, TEAMcare, Cochrane/Gilbody, CADET). (v) Describe implementation pitfalls and when to step up to specialty/crisis care. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answerShowHide

(i) Definition vs co-location. Collaborative care (CoCM) is team-based, population-registered, measurement-driven management of common mental disorders in primary care with treatment-to-target and psychiatric caseload review. Co-location places a clinician on site but without registry, serial measures, and systematic caseload review is not CoCM fidelity.[1][2]

(ii) Roles and principles. Roles: primary care provider; behavioural health care manager; psychiatric consultant. Principles: patient-centered team care; population-based care (registry); measurement-based treatment to target; evidence-based treatments; accountable caseload outcomes.[1]

(iii) Measurement and red flags. Use PHQ-9 (0–27) and GAD-7 serially; common PHQ-9 screen threshold around 10; always action item 9 suicide content with structured risk assessment. Red flags for immediate specialty/crisis: active plan/intent, psychosis, mania, severe agitation, medical instability — not routine CoCM follow-up alone.[6][2]

(iv) Evidence. IMPACT: late-life depression CoCM superior to usual care.[1] TEAMcare: multicondition care improves depression and chronic disease control.[3] Gilbody cumulative meta-analysis and Archer Cochrane: collaborative care improves depression (and anxiety in Cochrane) vs usual care.[4][2] CADET: UK cluster RCT — effective, preferred by patients to 12 months.[5]

(v) Pitfalls and step-up. Pitfalls: screening without capacity; fidelity decay; therapeutic inertia; overloaded care managers; mislabeling co-location as CoCM. Step up within programme when not at target; escalate to specialty for complexity/resistance/diagnostic doubt; crisis pathways for acute risk. Psychiatric consultant multiplies reach via caseload review rather than full intake of every mild case.[1][2]

Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this meqs / saq. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Psychiatry Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Unützer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, et al. Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial JAMA, 2002.PMID 12472325
  2. [2]Archer J, Bower P, Gilbody S, et al. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012.PMID 23076925
  3. [3]Katon WJ, Lin EH, Von Korff M, et al. Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 21190455
  4. [4]Gilbody S, Bower P, Fletcher J, et al. Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes Arch Intern Med, 2006.PMID 17130383
  5. [5]Richards DA, Hill JJ, Gask L, et al. Clinical effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): cluster randomised controlled trial BMJ, 2013.PMID 23959152
  6. [6]Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure J Gen Intern Med, 2001.PMID 11556941
Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Psychiatry Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousCognitive psychology applied to depression, panic, and psychosis (MEQ)Foundations — cognitive psychologyNextComplaint management and professional regulation (MEQ)Professional — complaint management and regulation