Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Psych CASC / OSCEFoundations — epidemiologic methods for psychiatry

Psych CASC / OSCE · Foundations — epidemiologic methods for psychiatry

Journal club epidemiology critique — teaching/CASC-style station

MRCPsych/FRANZCP-style teaching station: prevalence type, response bias, OR vs PAF, causal language, screening base rates.

communication1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
You are the psychiatry registrar facilitating a 10-minute teaching station with a foundation doctor and a medical student. Station material is a one-page abstract: 'Cross-sectional household survey (n=1,200, response rate 48%). Lifetime depression by self-report checklist 28%. Cannabis use associated with depression OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.2–3.0). Authors conclude cannabis causes nearly one-third of depression (PAF 30%) and recommend universal school cannabis screening using a 2-item tool (Sn 80%, Sp 80%) to prevent depression.' Your job is to teach correct measure choice, bias threats, PAF assumptions, and why universal screening PPV will fail — without humiliating juniors or dismissing all observational evidence.

Station brief

Format. Teaching/communication station, approximately 8–10 minutes. Facilitate; do not monologue. [1]

Candidate instructions. Help the team correctly name the frequency measure, list bias threats, explain why PAF 30% is not proved, and show why universal school screening is epidemiologically weak at low prevalence. Close with a collaborative rewrite of the abstract’s conclusion. [2][3][4]

Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this CASC / OSCE. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Psychiatry Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References7ShowHide
  1. [1]Grimes DA, Schulz KF An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land Lancet, 2002.PMID 11809203
  2. [2]Grimes DA, Schulz KF Bias and causal associations in observational research Lancet, 2002.PMID 11812579
  3. [3]Rockhill B, Newman B, Weinberg C Use and misuse of population attributable fractions Am J Public Health, 1998.PMID 9584027
  4. [4]Altman DG, Bland JM Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values BMJ, 1994.PMID 8038641
  5. [5]Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Déry V Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age Bull World Health Organ, 2008.PMID 18438522
  6. [6]von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. STROBE statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies Lancet, 2007.PMID 18064739
  7. [7]Hill AB The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med, 1965.PMID 14283879
Psychiatry Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Psychiatry Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousJournal club design critique — CASC/teaching stationFoundations — research methods and study designNextMatching community models for revolving-door psychosis — CASC/management stationPublic-community — community mental health models of care