Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Topicsprofessional-practice-and-evidence

Paeds · professional-practice-and-evidence

High-value care, stewardship and avoiding low-value interventions

Also known as High-value care in paediatrics · Low-value care and overuse · De-implementation and reducing overuse · Resource stewardship and value-based care · Choosing Wisely and antimicrobial stewardship

Fellowship guide to high-value care and stewardship in paediatrics: defining value, recognising low-value care, overuse and overdiagnosis, the clinician, family and system drivers of overuse, how low-value care harms children through care cascades and opportunity cost, common paediatric low-value practices, and the stepwise de-implementation cycle with its evidence-based levers — framed as good medicine and justice rather than rationing, with ANZ, UK, US and Canada guidance.

high16 referencesUpdated 11 July 202616 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • SAQ
  • Viva
  • Case

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1
  • Clinical case1

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWERACP DCERCPCH Progress+MRCPCH TheoryMRCPCH ClinicalABP General PediatricsACGME PediatricsRCPSC Pediatrics

Red flags

  • Ordering a test 'for reassurance' when the pre-test probability is low, seeding a cascade of false positives and further testing
  • Treating overdiagnosis as harmless because the finding is real, when the label and its downstream treatment carry their own harms
  • Equating restraint with rationing, and so withholding genuinely indicated, high-value care
  • Framing stewardship as cost-cutting rather than as patient-centred, evidence-based good medicine
  • Assuming a low-value practice will fade on its own without measurement, feedback and system change
  • Blaming overuse solely on parent demand when clinician habit and system incentives are the larger drivers

Life stages

neonateinfanttoddlerpreschoolschool-ageadolescent

Care settings

preventive-medical-homecommunity-schooloutpatientwarded-acutenicupicutelehealth

Clinical exam formats

written-onlyracp-dce-long-caseracp-dce-short-casemrcpch-history-managementrcpsc-structured-oral

Board mappings

  • General and Community Paediatrics
  • Quality use of medicines and resource stewardship
  • Professional practice and ethics
  • Renewed curriculum — Learning goal 11: Quality and safety, and value-based care
  • Stewardship and sustainability of health care
  • Scholarly activity and quality improvement
  • Written assessment of stewardship and quality of care
  • Structured discussion of a Choosing Wisely or stewardship scenario
  • Long Cases integrating value and resource use with the family
  • Short Cases on reducing an overused practice
  • 2. Professional skills and knowledge: quality improvement and resource stewardship
  • Patient safety themes
  • Safeguarding and screening themes
  • Foundation of Practice (FOP)
  • Applied Knowledge in Practice (AKP)
  • Communication
  • History taking and management
  • Health promotion and stewardship
  • General Pediatrics Content Outline — quality improvement, patient safety, and high-value care
  • General Pediatrics EPA: Stewardship and quality improvement
  • Bioethics and professional conduct
  • Systems-based Practice: cost-conscious, high-value care and stewardship
  • Practice-based Learning and Improvement: reducing overuse through audit and feedback
  • Professionalism
  • Health Advocate and Scholar
  • Manager and Collaborator
  • Medical Expert
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1
  • Clinical case1

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWERACP DCERCPCH Progress+MRCPCH TheoryMRCPCH ClinicalABP General PediatricsACGME PediatricsRCPSC Pediatrics

Red flags

  • Ordering a test 'for reassurance' when the pre-test probability is low, seeding a cascade of false positives and further testing
  • Treating overdiagnosis as harmless because the finding is real, when the label and its downstream treatment carry their own harms
  • Equating restraint with rationing, and so withholding genuinely indicated, high-value care
  • Framing stewardship as cost-cutting rather than as patient-centred, evidence-based good medicine
  • Assuming a low-value practice will fade on its own without measurement, feedback and system change
  • Blaming overuse solely on parent demand when clinician habit and system incentives are the larger drivers

Life stages

neonateinfanttoddlerpreschoolschool-ageadolescent

Care settings

preventive-medical-homecommunity-schooloutpatientwarded-acutenicupicutelehealth

Clinical exam formats

written-onlyracp-dce-long-caseracp-dce-short-casemrcpch-history-managementrcpsc-structured-oral

Board mappings

  • General and Community Paediatrics
  • Quality use of medicines and resource stewardship
  • Professional practice and ethics
  • Renewed curriculum — Learning goal 11: Quality and safety, and value-based care
  • Stewardship and sustainability of health care
  • Scholarly activity and quality improvement
  • Written assessment of stewardship and quality of care
  • Structured discussion of a Choosing Wisely or stewardship scenario
  • Long Cases integrating value and resource use with the family
  • Short Cases on reducing an overused practice
  • 2. Professional skills and knowledge: quality improvement and resource stewardship
  • Patient safety themes
  • Safeguarding and screening themes
  • Foundation of Practice (FOP)
  • Applied Knowledge in Practice (AKP)
  • Communication
  • History taking and management
  • Health promotion and stewardship
  • General Pediatrics Content Outline — quality improvement, patient safety, and high-value care
  • General Pediatrics EPA: Stewardship and quality improvement
  • Bioethics and professional conduct
  • Systems-based Practice: cost-conscious, high-value care and stewardship
  • Practice-based Learning and Improvement: reducing overuse through audit and feedback
  • Professionalism
  • Health Advocate and Scholar
  • Manager and Collaborator
  • Medical Expert
The fellowship answer

Do less of what does not help, and more of what does — and explain it so the family trusts you. High-value care maximises a child's benefit relative to harm and cost, while low-value care is any test, treatment or procedure whose likely harm or cost exceeds its likely benefit. [1] [8] Overuse is the dominant problem in well-resourced systems: a large share of routine care brings little or no benefit and a measurable burden of harm through false positives, overdiagnosis, care cascades and antimicrobial resistance. [2] [7] Reduce it with a stepwise de-implementation cycle — identify a low-value practice, measure it, diagnose its drivers, engage clinicians and families, de-implement with combined levers, then sustain and monitor — led by audit and feedback and shared decision-making. [13] [9] Frame every step as patient-centred good medicine and justice, never as rationing or simple cost-cutting. [8]

Two things that get mixed up

High-value care

    Low-value care (overuse)

      Stop an overused practice in the right order

      Identify the low-value practice · Measure the baseline rate · Diagnose the drivers · Engage clinicians and families · De-implement with combined levers · Sustain and monitor. Remember it as I-M-D-E-D-S: identify, measure, diagnose, engage, de-implement, sustain. Never announce a de-implementation drive before you have measured the problem and built a coalition to change it. [9] [13]

      Overview & Definition

      A mother brings her feverish, snuffling two-year-old and asks for "the antibiotics that worked last time." You are confident this is a viral upper respiratory infection, yet the easy path is to prescribe and move on. This ordinary encounter is where stewardship lives. High-value care is care that maximises a child's benefit relative to the harm, cost and opportunity it consumes, and low-value care is any test, treatment or procedure whose likely harm or cost exceeds its likely benefit. [1] [8]

      The discipline rests on three ideas that the examiner will expect you to name. Value is a ratio, not a price: an expensive intervention can be high-value and a cheap one low-value. [8] Overuse — doing too much — is the principal target of stewardship in well-resourced settings, sitting alongside underuse and misuse as the ways care can go wrong. [7] And stewardship is an ethical duty, not a budgetary one: every test or treatment consumes a finite resource and carries a finite risk, so the responsible clinician spends them only where they are likely to help. [2] [8]

      This page owns the principles, harm, measurement and the de-implementation of low-value care in child health. The statistical machinery for judging whether a therapy works belongs to the evidence-based medicine leaf, and the conversation skills for explaining restraint belong to shared decision-making and risk communication — cross-link them rather than rebuilding their content. [1]

      Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

      Continue reading

      You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

      Sign in to continueSee pricing
      References16ShowHide
      1. [1]Cassel CK, Guest JA Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care JAMA, 2012.PMID 22492759
      2. [2]Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD Eliminating waste in US health care JAMA, 2012.PMID 22419800
      3. [3]Shrank WH, Rogstad TL, Parekh N Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings JAMA, 2019.PMID 31589283
      4. [4]Coon ER, Young PC, Quinonez RA, et al. 2017 Update on Pediatric Medical Overuse: A Review JAMA pediatrics, 2018.PMID 29582079
      5. [5]Coon ER, Quinonez RA, Moyer VA, et al. Overdiagnosis: how our compulsion for diagnosis may be harming children Pediatrics, 2014.PMID 25287462
      6. [6]Bhatia RS, Levinson W, Shortt S, et al. Measuring the effect of Choosing Wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care BMJ quality & safety, 2015.PMID 26092165
      7. [7]Brownlee S, Chalkidou K, Doust J, et al. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world Lancet, 2017.PMID 28077234
      8. [8]Elshaug AG, Rosenthal MB, Lavis JN, et al. Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care Lancet, 2017.PMID 28077228
      9. [9]Morgan DJ, Leppin AL, Smith CD, et al. A Practical Framework for Understanding and Reducing Medical Overuse: Conceptualizing Overuse Through the Patient-Clinician Interaction Journal of hospital medicine, 2017.PMID 28459906
      10. [10]Moynihan R, Doust J, Henry D Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy BMJ, 2012.PMID 22645185
      11. [11]Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement JAMA, 1999.PMID 10535437
      12. [12]Schwartz AL, Landon BE, Elshaug AG, et al. Measuring low-value care in Medicare JAMA internal medicine, 2014.PMID 24819824
      13. [13]Colla CH Swimming against the current--what might work to reduce low-value care? New England Journal of Medicine, 2014.PMID 25271601
      14. [14]Ganguli I, Lupo C, Mainor AJ, et al. Assessment of Prevalence and Cost of Care Cascades After Routine Testing During the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit JAMA network open, 2020.PMID 33306120
      15. [15]Quinonez RA, Garber MD, Schroeder AR, et al. Choosing wisely in pediatric hospital medicine: five opportunities for improved healthcare value Journal of hospital medicine, 2013.PMID 23955837
      16. [16]Gerber JS, Prasad PA, Fiks AG, et al. Effect of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention on broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing by primary care pediatricians: a randomized trial JAMA, 2013.PMID 23757082

      Test yourself

      Practise what you just read

      • SAQ
      • Viva
      • Case
      Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

      $29/ monthor $279 / year

      The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

      • Complete library for one chosen specialty
      • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
      • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
      See pricingSign in
      PreviousHealth literacy and accessible paediatric informationprofessional-practice-and-evidenceNextImplementation science and translating evidence into practiceprofessional-practice-and-evidence