Paeds · child-safety-and-social-paediatrics
Multidisciplinary child-protection case conference
Also known as Child protection case conference · Child protection conference · Multi-agency case conference · MDT safeguarding meeting · Initial child protection conference · Review child protection conference
Fellowship-level guide to the multidisciplinary child-protection case conference: the statutory forum where agencies share information, assess risk, make decisions about ongoing harm, and agree a coordinated plan. Covers conference types, the paediatrician's preparation and contribution, information-sharing principles, decision-making biases, and the defensible sequence from written report through participation to plan implementation.
On this page
Study tools
Your progress
Saved on this device.
Practise this topic
Target exams
Red flags
- Attending the conference without a written report — verbal-only contributions are untraceable and may be distorted in the record
- Presenting beyond your expertise or offering definitive causation opinions the evidence does not support
- Failing to share relevant clinical information because of misplaced confidentiality concerns
- Treating the case conference as a clinical meeting rather than a statutory multi-agency decision-making forum
- Accepting a plan with actions you cannot deliver or timelines you have not agreed to
- Not recording the conference outcomes and your commitments in the child's medical record
- Allowing professional bias or anchoring to drive the group's substantiation decision without challenge
Life stages
Care settings
Clinical exam formats
Board mappings
- General and Community Paediatrics
- Ethics, law and professional practice
- Child protection and inter-agency working
- Current 2026 PREP curriculum — Learning goal 9: Clinical assessment and management — child safety and maltreatment
- Renewed curriculum for first-year trainees from 2027 — Learning goal 12: Communication with patients, families, and health professionals
- Professional practice: inter-agency case conferences and the paediatrician's statutory role
- Clinical Applications
- Ethics and law in paediatric practice
- Child protection: the multidisciplinary case conference and information sharing
- Long Cases
- Short Cases
- Communication stations
- 9. Safeguarding vulnerable children
- 2. Professional skills and knowledge: Communication
- 1. Professional values and behaviours
- 8. Safeguarding: statutory duties and inter-agency working
- Foundation of Practice (FOP)
- Applied Knowledge in Practice (AKP)
- Safeguarding, child protection and the law
- Communication
- History
- Clinical
- General Pediatrics Content Outline — Domain 4: Child Abuse and Neglect
- General Pediatrics Content Outline — Domain 23: Ethics
- General Pediatrics EPA 10: Leading interprofessional teams
- Multidisciplinary case conferences and child welfare team participation
- Professionalism 1: Professional Behavior and Ethical Principles
- Systems-Based Practice 1: Legal and regulatory requirements including child protection
- Systems-Based Practice 2: Coordination of care across systems
- Interpersonal and Communication Skills 1: Patient- and family-centered communication
- Professional
- Health Advocate
- Collaborator: working with child-protection agencies and inter-agency teams
- Pediatrics: participation in multi-agency child welfare conferences
Overview & Definition
Picture a six-year-old on your ward with an inflicted burn. You have treated the wound, completed the skeletal survey, consulted the child-protection team, and made the mandatory report. The child-protection authority has now convened a case conference, and you have been invited. Your job at this point is not to investigate further or to prove the diagnosis — it is to carry your clinical evidence into a room full of professionals, present it clearly, and help the group decide what happens next. [1] [11]
A multidisciplinary child-protection case conference is a formal, structured meeting convened by the statutory child-protection authority that brings together the professionals and agencies involved with a child and family. Its purpose is to share information, assess the risk of ongoing significant harm, decide whether the child needs a formal child-protection plan, and coordinate the multi-agency response. Frothingham described the British model of the case conference as a collaborative decision-making forum that contrasts with the more adversarial American approach — a distinction that persists across jurisdictions today. [7]
The conference is convened by the child-protection authority, not by the clinician. The social worker or case manager acts as the conference chair or co-chair; the paediatrician is an invited contributor. This distinction matters because the conference has statutory weight — its decisions may lead to a child-protection plan, a change of placement, or the initiation of care proceedings — and your role is to inform those decisions, not to make them alone. [1] [5]
The conference differs from a strategy discussion, which is an urgent, time-limited multi-agency meeting (typically police and social care) that decides whether to investigate and how. The strategy discussion happens early; the case conference happens after information has been gathered, and it makes the longer-term plan. Both are statutory forums, but they serve different purposes in the pathway. [1]
The core functions of the case conference are fourfold: information sharing (each agency contributes what it knows), risk assessment (the group assesses the likelihood and severity of ongoing harm), decision-making (whether the child meets the threshold for a protection plan), and care planning (the group agrees on actions, identifies a lead professional, and sets review timelines). Gilbert and colleagues framed these functions as the backbone of the multi-agency response to child maltreatment. [1]
References12ShowHide
- [1]Gilbert R, Kemp A, Thoburn J, Sidebotham P, Radford L, Glaser D, MacMillan HL Recognising and responding to child maltreatment. Lancet, 2009.PMID 19056119
- [2]Cowley LE, Maguire SA, Farewell DM, Kemp AM Factors influencing child protection professionals' decision-making and multidisciplinary collaboration in suspected abusive head trauma cases: a qualitative study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2018.PMID 29913434
- [3]Jent JF, Eaton CK, Knickerbocker L, et al. Multidisciplinary Child Protection Decision Making About Physical Abuse: Determining Substantiation Thresholds and Biases. Children and Youth Services Review, 2011.PMID 21804681
- [4]Jent JF, Merrick MT, Dandes SK, et al. Multidisciplinary assessment of child maltreatment: a multi-site pilot descriptive analysis of the Florida Child Protection Team model. Children and Youth Services Review, 2009.PMID 20490376
- [5]Lo WC, Fung GP, Cheung PC Factors associated with multidisciplinary case conference outcomes in children admitted to a regional hospital in Hong Kong with suspected child abuse: a retrospective case series with internal comparison. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2017.PMID 28416733
- [6]Bell L Patterns of interactions in multidisciplinary child protection teams in New Jersey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2001.PMID 11214813
- [7]Frothingham TE The British Case Conference in child sexual abuse: another model for America. Child Abuse & Neglect, 1994.PMID 8124594
- [8]Okato A, Hashimoto T, Tanaka M, et al. Hospital-based child protection teams that care for parents who abuse or neglect their children recognize the need for multidisciplinary collaborative practice involving perinatal care and mental health professionals. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2018.PMID 29503560
- [9]Draus JM Jr A multidisciplinary child protection team improves the care of nonaccidental trauma patients. The American Surgeon, 2017.PMID 28541857
- [10]Raman S, Maiese M, Vasquez V, et al. Review of serious events in cases of (suspected) child abuse and/or neglect: a RoSE by any other name? Child Abuse & Neglect, 2017.PMID 28662440
- [11]Kirk CB, Lucas-Herald A, Mok J Child protection medical assessments: why do we do them? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2010.PMID 19846995
- [12]Garstang J, Eatwell D, Sidebotham P, et al. Common factors in serious case reviews of child maltreatment where there is a medical cause of death: qualitative thematic analysis. BMJ Open, 2021.PMID 34353801