Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Topicschild-safety-and-social-paediatrics

Paeds · child-safety-and-social-paediatrics

Intimate partner violence and its impact on children

Also known as Domestic violence and children · Child exposure to intimate partner violence · Family violence and child outcomes · Coercive control and child harm · Witnessing domestic abuse

Fellowship topic on intimate partner violence (IPV) and its impact on children: the four pathways of exposure (direct witness, auditory, aftermath, coercive control), global prevalence and the 30 to 70 percent co-occurrence with child maltreatment, the toxic-stress / HPA-axis cascade that makes witnessing violence an adverse childhood experience with a dose-response to adult disease, the heterogeneous presenting patterns (externalizing, internalizing, somatic, developmental, direct co-victimization), the differential from ADHD, ODD, ASD and anxiety, trauma-informed enquiry and validated screening (HARK, HITS), the immediate safety assessment with lethal-means restriction, the child-protection reporting threshold, referral of the non-offending parent to IPV services without blame, trauma-focused therapy (TF-CBT), the buffering-adult recovery model, and ANZ/UK/US/Canada guideline differences.

high14 referencesUpdated 12 July 202623 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • SAQ
  • Viva
  • Case

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1
  • Clinical case1

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWERACP DCERCPCH Progress+MRCPCH TheoryMRCPCH ClinicalABP General PediatricsACGME PediatricsRCPSC Pediatrics

Red flags

  • A child's behavioural regression, anxiety or aggression that emerged after family stress — take a trauma history before labelling it ADHD or ODD
  • Co-occurrence: finding intimate partner violence in the home mandates looking for direct child maltreatment, and vice versa
  • A non-offending parent who is evasive, fearful or minimising may be under active coercive control — do not press in front of the partner
  • Firearms or other lethal means in a home with IPV — the single strongest predictor of intimate partner homicide
  • A child's disclosure of violence at home — believe it, record it verbatim, and do not interrogate
  • Pregnancy is a high-risk period for escalation of IPV — screen every pregnant adolescent and young parent
  • Never document IPV disclosure in a record the perpetrator can access — it can trigger retaliation against the non-offending parent or child
  • Adolescent girls exposed to IPV are at elevated risk of dating violence and re-victimization

Life stages

fetalneonateinfanttoddlerpreschoolschool-ageadolescent

Care settings

preventive-medical-homecommunity-schooloutpatientwarded-acuterural-remotetelehealth

Clinical exam formats

written-onlyracp-dce-long-caseracp-dce-short-casemrcpch-history-managementmrcpch-communicationrcpsc-structured-oral

Board mappings

  • General and Community Paediatrics: intimate partner violence and its impact on children
  • Child protection: recognising and responding to IPV exposure
  • Renewed curriculum — Child safety and social paediatrics: IPV exposure, co-occurrence with maltreatment, and the toxic-stress mechanism
  • Mental health: trauma-informed care and the buffering-adult recovery model
  • General and Community Paediatrics: IPV screening, safety assessment and child-protection response
  • Mental Health: the impact of family violence on child development and behaviour
  • Communication and professional practice: discussing IPV exposure and safety planning with a non-offending parent
  • Long Case involving behavioural or developmental concerns with a background of family violence
  • Structured discussion of the co-occurrence of IPV and child maltreatment
  • D9 Safeguarding: recognising and responding to IPV exposure as a form of child harm
  • Health promotion: the role of the paediatrician in identifying and responding to family violence
  • Mental health: trauma-informed assessment and referral
  • Foundation of Practice (FOP): child protection, family violence and the impact on development
  • Applied Knowledge in Practice (AKP): behavioural and developmental presentations of trauma exposure
  • Communication: explaining IPV exposure, safety planning and the child-protection process to a parent
  • History-taking and management scenario involving behavioural concerns and family violence
  • Child development station with a safeguarding overlay
  • General Pediatrics Content Outline — child abuse and neglect and family violence
  • Developmental and behavioural pediatrics: the impact of trauma on child development
  • Bioethics: confidentiality, consent and the duty to report when a child is at risk
  • Systems-Based Practice and Advocacy: recognising IPV exposure and coordinating the multidisciplinary response
  • Professionalism: trauma-informed care, non-judgemental engagement and cultural humility
  • Patient Care: the recognition-to-response bundle for IPV-exposed children
  • Communicator and Professional: documentation, safety planning and reporting IPV exposure on a reasonable belief of harm
  • Health Advocate: addressing the social determinants of family violence
  • Collaborator: multidisciplinary coordination with child protection, IPV services and mental health
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic

  • Short-answer question1
  • Viva station1
  • Clinical case1

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWERACP DCERCPCH Progress+MRCPCH TheoryMRCPCH ClinicalABP General PediatricsACGME PediatricsRCPSC Pediatrics

Red flags

  • A child's behavioural regression, anxiety or aggression that emerged after family stress — take a trauma history before labelling it ADHD or ODD
  • Co-occurrence: finding intimate partner violence in the home mandates looking for direct child maltreatment, and vice versa
  • A non-offending parent who is evasive, fearful or minimising may be under active coercive control — do not press in front of the partner
  • Firearms or other lethal means in a home with IPV — the single strongest predictor of intimate partner homicide
  • A child's disclosure of violence at home — believe it, record it verbatim, and do not interrogate
  • Pregnancy is a high-risk period for escalation of IPV — screen every pregnant adolescent and young parent
  • Never document IPV disclosure in a record the perpetrator can access — it can trigger retaliation against the non-offending parent or child
  • Adolescent girls exposed to IPV are at elevated risk of dating violence and re-victimization

Life stages

fetalneonateinfanttoddlerpreschoolschool-ageadolescent

Care settings

preventive-medical-homecommunity-schooloutpatientwarded-acuterural-remotetelehealth

Clinical exam formats

written-onlyracp-dce-long-caseracp-dce-short-casemrcpch-history-managementmrcpch-communicationrcpsc-structured-oral

Board mappings

  • General and Community Paediatrics: intimate partner violence and its impact on children
  • Child protection: recognising and responding to IPV exposure
  • Renewed curriculum — Child safety and social paediatrics: IPV exposure, co-occurrence with maltreatment, and the toxic-stress mechanism
  • Mental health: trauma-informed care and the buffering-adult recovery model
  • General and Community Paediatrics: IPV screening, safety assessment and child-protection response
  • Mental Health: the impact of family violence on child development and behaviour
  • Communication and professional practice: discussing IPV exposure and safety planning with a non-offending parent
  • Long Case involving behavioural or developmental concerns with a background of family violence
  • Structured discussion of the co-occurrence of IPV and child maltreatment
  • D9 Safeguarding: recognising and responding to IPV exposure as a form of child harm
  • Health promotion: the role of the paediatrician in identifying and responding to family violence
  • Mental health: trauma-informed assessment and referral
  • Foundation of Practice (FOP): child protection, family violence and the impact on development
  • Applied Knowledge in Practice (AKP): behavioural and developmental presentations of trauma exposure
  • Communication: explaining IPV exposure, safety planning and the child-protection process to a parent
  • History-taking and management scenario involving behavioural concerns and family violence
  • Child development station with a safeguarding overlay
  • General Pediatrics Content Outline — child abuse and neglect and family violence
  • Developmental and behavioural pediatrics: the impact of trauma on child development
  • Bioethics: confidentiality, consent and the duty to report when a child is at risk
  • Systems-Based Practice and Advocacy: recognising IPV exposure and coordinating the multidisciplinary response
  • Professionalism: trauma-informed care, non-judgemental engagement and cultural humility
  • Patient Care: the recognition-to-response bundle for IPV-exposed children
  • Communicator and Professional: documentation, safety planning and reporting IPV exposure on a reasonable belief of harm
  • Health Advocate: addressing the social determinants of family violence
  • Collaborator: multidisciplinary coordination with child protection, IPV services and mental health
The fellowship answer

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is physical, sexual or emotional abuse, or coercive control, by a current or former partner. A child does not have to be hit to be harmed. Exposure means seeing, hearing, witnessing the aftermath of, or being used as a tool of coercive control in that abuse, and it is itself an adverse childhood experience (ACE) with a dose-response to adult disease. The co-occurrence of IPV and direct child maltreatment is 30 to 70 per cent, so finding one mandates looking for the other. Children exposed present with externalizing behaviour (aggression, inattention), internalizing distress (anxiety, withdrawal), somatic complaints, regression, or direct co-injury, and are commonly mislabelled as ADHD, ODD or anxiety before a trauma history is taken. Run the response in parallel: ensure immediate safety (lethal-means restriction, escape plan), assess and document in a trauma-informed way, screen for co-occurring maltreatment, report to child protection on a reasonable belief of risk, refer the non-offending parent to IPV services without blame, and arrange trauma-focused therapy (TF-CBT) for the child. The strongest buffer is a stable, responsive adult — usually the non-offending parent — so protect, support and never blame that relationship. [2] [11] [9]

Two children, same symptoms, different cause

Primary neurodevelopmental (ADHD)

    Trauma exposure (IPV)

      Overview & Definition

      A seven-year-old boy is referred to your clinic for "behavioural problems and possible ADHD." His teacher reports aggression, distractibility, and emotional outbursts that began six months ago. His mother seems tense and deflects questions about home life. During a separate interview, the boy asks quietly whether you can "make the shouting stop at night." That single sentence reframes the entire presentation — this is not ADHD; this is a child living with intimate partner violence, and the behavioural symptoms are the trauma speaking through his body. [2] [9]

      Intimate partner violence is any behaviour within an intimate relationship that causes physical, sexual or psychological harm, including physical aggression, sexual coercion, psychological abuse, and controlling behaviours. The controlling behaviours — isolating the partner from friends and family, monitoring their movements, controlling finances, threatening, humiliating — are called coercive control, and they are abuse in themselves. When we say a child is "exposed" to IPV, we mean something broader than witnessing a physical assault. The child may see it directly, hear it from another room, see the aftermath (injuries, fear, broken objects, police), or be used as an instrument of coercive control — forced to monitor the victim, carry messages, or witness the degradation of their parent. [1] [2]

      Why should a paediatrician care about something that happens "between the parents"? Three reasons. First, the co-occurrence rate of IPV and direct child maltreatment is 30 to 70 per cent — the violence rarely stays between the adults. Second, the exposure itself is harmful: witnessing IPV is classified as an ACE because it activates the same toxic-stress cascade as being hit, and it carries a dose-response relationship to adult disease. Third, the presentations are common and heterogeneous — behavioural, developmental, somatic, psychiatric — and the child will reach your clinic through the front door of those symptoms long before anyone names the violence. [2] [11] [12]

      ~1 in 3women globally who experience IPV in their lifetime
      30–70%co-occurrence of IPV in the home with direct child maltreatment
      Dose-responsemore ACEs (including witnessing IPV) predict worse adult health
      Non-offending parentusually the child's strongest buffer — support, do not blame
      Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

      Continue reading

      You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

      Sign in to continueSee pricing
      References14ShowHide
      1. [1]Devries KM; Mak JY; Garcia-Moreno C; et al The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science, 2013.PMID 23788730
      2. [2]Holt S; Buckley H; Whelan S The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: a review of the literature. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2008.PMID 18752848
      3. [3]Kitzmann KM; Gaylord NK; Holt AR; Kenny ED Child witnesses to domestic violence: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2003.PMID 12699028
      4. [4]Wolfe DA; Crooks CV; Lee V; McIntyre-Smith A; Jaffe PG The effects of children's exposure to domestic violence: a meta-analysis and critique. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2003.PMID 14620578
      5. [5]Rivara FP; Anderson ML; Fishman P; et al Intimate partner violence and health care costs and utilization for children living in the home. Pediatrics, 2007.PMID 18055676
      6. [6]Bonomi AE; Anderson ML; Rivara FP; Thompson RS Health outcomes in women with physical and sexual intimate partner violence exposure. Journal of Women's Health, 2007.PMID 17903075
      7. [7]Huth-Bocks AC; Levendosky AA; Bogat GA The effects of domestic violence during pregnancy on maternal and infant health. Violence and Victims, 2002.PMID 12033553
      8. [8]Finkelhor D; Turner HA; Ormrod R; Hamby SL Prevalence of childhood exposure to violence, crime, and abuse: results from the National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence. JAMA Pediatrics, 2015.PMID 26121291
      9. [9]Osofsky JD The impact of violence on children. The Future of Children, 1999.PMID 10777999
      10. [10]Turner HA; Shattuck A; Finkelhor D; Hamby S Polyvictimization and youth violence exposure across contexts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2016.PMID 26598060
      11. [11]Felitti VJ; Anda RF; Nordenberg D; et al Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1998.PMID 9635069
      12. [12]Gilbert R; Widom CS; Browne K; Fergusson D; Webb E; Janson S Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet, 2009.PMID 19056114
      13. [13]Turner HA; Finkelhor D; Ormrod R Poly-victimization in a national sample of children and youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010.PMID 20171535
      14. [14]Finkelhor D; Ormrod RK; Turner HA Polyvictimization and trauma in a national longitudinal cohort. Development and Psychopathology, 2007.PMID 17241488

      Test yourself

      Practise what you just read

      • SAQ
      • Viva
      • Case
      Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

      $29/ monthor $279 / year

      The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

      • Complete library for one chosen specialty
      • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
      • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
      See pricingSign in
      PreviousInflicted fractures and other non-accidental musculoskeletal injurychild-safety-and-social-paediatricsNextIntra-oral injury and occult traumachild-safety-and-social-paediatrics