Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds SAQsophthalmology

Paeds SAQs · ophthalmology

Visual development, amblyopia and vision screening in childhood — formative SAQs

Two formative SAQs: a five-year-old with reduced left eye acuity found at school-entry screening testing the recognition of amblyopia as a cortical deficit, the refer threshold and the stepwise management ladder; and a two-month-old with leukocoria and an absent red reflex testing the recognition of the deprivation red flag, the urgent referral pathway and the rationale for early surgery in congenital cataract.

20 marks30 min1 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWEMRCPCH TheoryABP General Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWEMRCPCH TheoryABP General Pediatrics
Prompt
Visual development, amblyopia and vision screening in childhood

SAQ 1 — The child who sees well with both eyes open (10 marks, 15 minutes)

A five-year-old girl attends school-entry vision screening. With both eyes open she manages perfectly, but when the right eye is occluded she reads only the top line of the chart with the left (an acuity of about 6/60, or 1.0 logMAR) that does not improve with a pinhole. The eyes are structurally normal, the red reflexes are symmetric, and the cover test shows no manifest turn. [2]

a) Define amblyopia and explain why this is a cortical rather than an ocular problem. (2 marks) [2]

b) State the screening acuity refer threshold that should have triggered referral, and explain why a both-eyes-open check can miss this deficit. (2 marks) [1]

c) Outline the stepwise management, naming the first intervention and the two occlusion or penalisation options supported by the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group trials. (4 marks) [4] [5]

d) Give the population-level justification for universal preschool screening in one sentence. (2 marks) [7]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Donahue SP, Nixon CN Visual System Assessment in Infants, Children, and Young Adults by Pediatricians. Pediatrics, 2016.PMID 29756730
  2. [2]Holmes JM, Clarke MP Amblyopia. Lancet, 2006.PMID 16631913
  3. [4]Wallace DK, Edwards AR, Cotter SA, et al. A randomized trial to evaluate 2 hours of daily patching for strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology, 2006.PMID 16751033
  4. [5]Repka MX, Kraker RT, Holmes JM, et al. Atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at 15 years of age of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2014.PMID 24789375
  5. [7]Solebo AL, Cumberland PM, Rahi JS Whole-population vision screening in children aged 4-5 years to detect amblyopia. Lancet, 2015.PMID 25499167
  6. [10]Anderson J Don't Miss This! Red Flags in the Pediatric Eye Examination: Abnormal Red Reflex. J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil, 2019.PMID 31329054
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousUveitis in children — formative SAQsophthalmology