Paeds SAQs · professional-practice-and-evidence
Professional boundaries and social media — formative SAQs
Formative SAQs on professional boundaries, the boundary spectrum, social media conduct, digital professionalism and the safeguard toolkit in paediatric practice.
On this page & tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 (10 marks)
A 14-year-old patient you have been seeing for two years for a chronic condition sends you a friend request on Instagram. Her mother also messages you on WhatsApp at 10 pm with a clinical question about a rash, bypassing the clinic's after-hours number. [3]
- Explain the principles that guide your response to the friend request and the WhatsApp message, and describe what you would do in each case. (5) [1] [2]
- Distinguish a boundary crossing from a boundary violation, and explain the slippery-slope mechanism by which minor crossings can lead to serious violations. (3) [1]
- Describe the safeguard toolkit you would use to prevent similar challenges in future. (2) [2] [8]
Model answer
I would decline the friend request kindly but firmly, with a brief explanation that I keep my personal and professional lives separate to provide the best care — "I care about your care, and to do that well I need to keep our relationship professional." I would not respond to the WhatsApp message on the personal app; I would redirect the mother to the approved after-hours clinical contact and, if the clinical question is urgent, triage it through the proper channel. The principle is that the responsibility for the boundary always sits with the clinician regardless of who initiated the contact, and that approved secure channels exist for clinical communication precisely to protect the patient's privacy and the integrity of the record. [1] [2]
A boundary crossing is a deviation from standard practice that may be benign or even beneficial — a small gift, a brief therapeutic self-disclosure — and is manageable with reflection and correction. A boundary violation is a harmful deviation that exploits the patient — sexual contact, financial exploitation — and requires a formal, escalating response. The slippery-slope mechanism describes how a series of minor crossings, each rationalised as harmless or "different," lowers the threshold for the next crossing, so that the clinician drifts gradually toward a serious violation without a single dramatic event. [1]
The safeguard toolkit includes chaperones for intimate examinations, approved secure messaging platforms for all clinical contact, institutional social media accounts for public-facing content, documented decisions about gifts, and — most importantly — routine early consultation with a trusted colleague or supervisor. [2] [8]
You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship atlas.
References7Show ledgerHide ledger
- [1]Ginsburg S Professional Boundaries. JAMA, 2016.PMID 27784099
- [2]Bird S Managing professional boundaries. Australian family physician, 2013.PMID 24024230
- [3]Vukušić Rukavina T Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review. Journal of medical Internet research, 2021.PMID 34662284
- [5]Swartz MK Professional Conduct and Social Media. Journal of pediatric health care, 2016.PMID 27094984
- [8]Ellaway RH Exploring digital professionalism. Medical teacher, 2015.PMID 26030375
- [10]Chaet D Ethical practice in Telehealth and Telemedicine. Journal of general internal medicine, 2017.PMID 28653233
- [13]Hutchison C The ethics of treating family members. Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2019.PMID 30817390