Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds SAQsinvestigations-procedures-and-technology

Paeds SAQs · investigations-procedures-and-technology

Procedural pain: topical anaesthesia, preparation, distraction and non-pharmacological support — formative SAQs

Formative SAQs on the multi-modal comfort bundle for procedural pain in infants and children: agent choice, doses and timings, the methaemoglobinaemia risk of EMLA in the young infant, the sucrose dose, comfort positioning, and when to escalate beyond the bundle to procedural sedation.

20 marks30 min4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWEMRCPCH ClinicalABP General Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWEMRCPCH ClinicalABP General Pediatrics
Prompt
Procedural pain: topical anaesthesia, preparation, distraction and non-pharmacological support

SAQ 1 (10 marks)

A 6-month-old previously well infant is brought to the emergency department for a febrile illness and requires a venepuncture and cannulation as part of the workup. The infant is alert and being nursed by the mother, who is distressed by the thought of her baby being hurt. The team has about 70 minutes before the bloods must be taken. [1] [11]

  1. Outline the structured pre-procedure comfort assessment and the multi-modal comfort bundle you will apply, naming the specific agents, their concentrations and timings. (5) [2] [9]
  2. Give the exact oral sucrose dose and timing you would use, and explain why the dose must not be expressed as millilitres per kilogram. (3) [3]
  3. Explain why you will combine the layers rather than rely on a single measure, and cite the evidence. (2) [1]

Model answer — SAQ 1

(1) Assessment and bundle (5). I run a short structured assessment covering the child, the procedure, the allergies and the time. The child is a 6-month-old with no prior needle trauma and a parent who can hold; the procedure is a venepuncture and cannulation of moderate, brief pain needing the arm still; the allergies are none, and at six months there is no methaemoglobinaemia contraindication, so EMLA is acceptable; the time is about 70 minutes, which allows a full EMLA hour. The bundle: I apply EMLA (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) under an occlusive dressing for at least 60 minutes at the likely site (or two sites), engage the parent in an honest explanation, plan an upright comfort position on the mother's lap (chest-to-chest), run an age-appropriate distraction (a tablet video), and offer breastfeeding during the procedure or oral sucrose as the sweet/oral layer. [2] [9]

(2) Sucrose dose and timing (3). If breastfeeding is not used, I give oral sucrose 24%, 0.1 to 2 mL (maximum about 2 mL) about two minutes before the procedure and again as the needle goes in, onto the anterior tongue or buccal mucosa. The dose is an absolute volume, never millilitres per kilogram, because dosing per kilogram or in large volumes risks aspiration, chloride loading and overload, while the effective analgesic window is a small volume engaging the taste-bud to endogenous-opioid pathway. Giving it only as the needle is inserted (rather than two minutes before) is under-effective. [3]

(3) Why combine the layers (2). Each layer acts on a different limb of the pain response — topical anaesthesia blocks the skin sodium channel, sweet taste recruits endogenous opioid and dopamine, and distraction and comfort positioning engage gate-control and attentional modulation — so no single agent abolishes procedural pain. The Cochrane review on non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain found that combining non-pharmacological with pharmacological measures reduces procedural pain better than either alone, which is why the fellowship answer is always a bundle. [1]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References5ShowHide
  1. [1]Pillai Riddell RR, Bucsea O, Shiff I, et al Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023.PMID 37314064
  2. [2]Foster JP, Taylor C, Spence K Topical anaesthesia for needle-related pain in newborn infants Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017.PMID 28160271
  3. [3]Yamada J, Bueno M, Santos L, et al Sucrose analgesia for heel-lance procedures in neonates Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023.PMID 37655530
  4. [9]Friedrichsdorf SJ, Eull D, Weidner C, et al A hospital-wide initiative to eliminate or reduce needle pain in children using lean methodology Pain Rep, 2018.PMID 30324169
  5. [11]Shah V, Taddio A, McMurtry CM, et al Pharmacological and Combined Interventions to Reduce Vaccine Injection Pain in Children and Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Clin J Pain, 2015.PMID 26201016
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousProcedural consent, preparation and child-life support — formative SAQsinvestigations-procedures-and-technologyNextRadiation protection and imaging stewardship — formative SAQsinvestigations-procedures-and-technology