Paeds SAQs · child-safety-and-social-paediatrics
Physical abuse: bruising and sentinel injuries — formative SAQs
Two formative short-answer questions on inflicted bruising, the TEN-4 FACES-L rule, sentinel injuries, the bleeding-disorder differential and the safeguarding pathway.
On this page & tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — Bruise behind the ear in a 3-month-old (10 marks)
A 3-month-old infant is brought to the emergency department with coryza. On examination you notice a 1.5 cm bruise behind the left ear. The caregiver attributes it to the infant wriggling against the bouncy chair. The infant is not yet rolling over independently. [3] [2]
Questions
- How do you interpret this bruise, and what is the clinical significance of its location and the infant's mobility? (4 marks) [3] [1]
- Outline the investigations you would arrange and why. (3 marks) [4]
- Describe the immediate safeguarding and disposition steps, including the role of mandatory reporting. (3 marks) [4] [2]
Model answer
Interpretation (4). Bruising is rare in infants who are not yet independently mobile; the foundational work on accidental bruising established that those who do not cruise rarely bruise. A bruise behind the ear is a TEN-4 region (ear) and in the TEN-4 FACES-L rule a single positive feature in a child under four triggers an abuse evaluation. The bouncy-chair mechanism is developmentally implausible for a 3-month-old who is not yet rolling. Treat this as a sentinel injury and a mandatory-reporting trigger. [3] [1] [5]
Investigations (3). A skeletal survey (dedicated films, not a babygram) because the infant is under two years, with a repeat at about two weeks to reveal occult rib and metaphyseal fractures. A coagulopathy panel (full blood examination and platelets, PT, aPTT, fibrinogen, von Willebrand panel) because bruising is the presenting feature, understanding that a normal result does not exclude abuse. Neuroimaging if any neurological sign or concern for abusive head trauma. [4] [11]
Safeguarding and disposition (3). Refer to the child-protection and social-work team and the designated doctor for child protection. Make the mandatory report under local statute; do not wait for certainty. Admit to a place of safety while the assessment is completed because the risk of recurrence after a sentinel injury is real regardless of how minor the bruise looks. Screen siblings and other young household contacts for occult injury. Document the mechanism verbatim and the multi-agency plan. [4] [2] [7]
You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship atlas.
References9Show ledgerHide ledger
- [1]Pierce MC Bruising characteristics discriminating physical child abuse from accidental trauma. Pediatrics, 2010.PMID 19969620
- [2]Sheets LK Sentinel injuries in infants evaluated for child physical abuse. Pediatrics, 2013.PMID 23478861
- [3]Sugar NF Bruises in infants and toddlers: those who don't cruise rarely bruise. Puget Sound Pediatric Research Network. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 1999.PMID 10201724
- [4]Christian CW The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics, 2015.PMID 25917988
- [5]Pierce MC Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule to Predict Abuse in Young Children Based on Bruising Characteristics. JAMA network open, 2021.PMID 33852003
- [6]Petska HW Sentinel injuries: subtle findings of physical abuse. Pediatric clinics of North America, 2014.PMID 25242706
- [7]Letson MM Prior opportunities to identify abuse in children with abusive head trauma. Child abuse & neglect, 2016.PMID 27680755
- [9]Maguire S Diagnosing abuse: a systematic review of torn frenum and other intra-oral injuries. Archives of disease in childhood, 2007.PMID 17468129
- [11]Hultman L Testing for bleeding disorders in child abuse: AAP recommendation adherence and testing results. Child abuse & neglect, 2025.PMID 40158474