Paeds SAQs · fetal-neonatal-and-perinatal
Neonatal palliative care and end-of-life decision-making — formative SAQs
Two formative SAQs on neonatal palliative care and end-of-life decision-making: perinatal palliative care for a lethal fetal anomaly, the best-interests balance and window of opportunity, withholding versus withdrawing, futility versus value dispute, and end-of-life symptom management in the newborn.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — Perinatal palliative care and a window-of-opportunity decision (10 marks)
A term newborn is ventilated and unresponsive three days after a severe hypoxic-ischaemic insult. Neuroimaging shows severe, irreversible injury and the prognosis for meaningful recovery is poor. The parents, who are present and engaged, ask what the team recommends. [12] [10]
Questions
- State the best-interests principle that frames this decision and the factors you would weigh. (4 marks) [10]
- Explain the "window of opportunity" concept and why a redirection decision, if made, is most defensible now. (3 marks) [12]
- Outline how you would run the goals-of-care conversation and what you would document, including the comfort plan. (3 marks) [1] [4]
Model answer
Best-interests principle and factors (4). For a newborn who cannot decide for themselves, the best-interests standard weighs the benefits of continued life-sustaining treatment against its burdens from the baby's point of view. The factors to weigh are the chance of survival and meaningful recovery, the relief or burden of continued treatment, the preservation of relationships and future development, and the cumulative burden — suffering, loss of dignity and prolonged dying — set against any achievable gain. [10]
Window of opportunity (3). Wilkinson described the window of opportunity: after a catastrophic, irreversible brain injury the prognosis is clearest in the first days, and a redirection or withdrawal decision is most defensible in that window. As time passes the picture muddies, complications accumulate, and the same decision becomes harder to justify and harder to execute well, so a decision reached now is more defensible than one deferred. [12]
Conversation and documentation (3). Set the scene, give a warning shot, and share the prognosis honestly in plain language. Ask the parents what they understand and what matters most to them, explore their values and fears, and agree a plan you both own. Bring a second neonatologist and the team to consensus beforehand, and use a professional interpreter if needed. Document the benefits and burdens analysis, who was present and agreed, what will and will not be offered, the comfort and symptom plan, and the bereavement follow-up. [1] [4]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Catlin A, Carter B Creation of a neonatal end-of-life palliative care protocol. J Perinatol, 2002.PMID 11948380
- [2]Breeze AC, Lees CC, Kumar A, Missfelder-Lobos HH, Murdoch EM Palliative care for prenatally diagnosed lethal fetal abnormality. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2007.PMID 16705007
- [4]Cortezzo DE, Meyer M Neonatal End-of-Life Symptom Management. Front Pediatr, 2020.PMID 33042931
- [10]Larcher V, Craig F, Bhogal K, Wilkinson D, Brierley J Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice. Arch Dis Child, 2015.PMID 25802250
- [11]Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, Haas CE, Luce JM, Rubenfeld GD, Rushton CH, Kaufman DC Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med, 2008.PMID 18431285
- [12]Wilkinson D The window of opportunity for treatment withdrawal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2011.PMID 21383270