Paeds SAQs · child-safety-and-social-paediatrics
Mandatory reporting and jurisdictional child-protection frameworks — formative SAQs
Two formative SAQs on mandatory reporting and jurisdictional child-protection frameworks: the reasonable-belief threshold, jurisdictional variation in reporting obligations, barriers and enablers to clinician reporting, and the defensible recognise-to-report pathway.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — The reasonable-belief threshold and a sentinel-injury report (10 marks)
A 4-month-old infant is brought to the emergency department by both parents with a swollen left thigh. X-ray reveals a spiral femur fracture. The parents state the infant rolled off the bed, but the infant is not yet rolling over. On examination you also notice a small bruise on the left pinna. [13] [8]
Questions
- State the mandatory-reporting threshold and explain why this presentation meets it. (4 marks) [1] [13]
- Outline the investigations you would arrange and why. (3 marks) [13]
- Describe how you would document this encounter to evidentiary standard. (3 marks) [8]
Model answer
Threshold and why it is met (4). The threshold for mandatory reporting is a reasonable belief that a child has suffered or is at risk of significant harm — not proof, certainty, or a conviction. A spiral femur fracture in a non-rolling infant is developmentally implausible as a fall from a bed, and a bruise on the pinna is an inflicted-injury pattern. A reasonable person in the clinician's position, holding this information, would form a belief that this infant has suffered inflicted injury. The clinician reports; the agency investigates — the clinician does not need to confirm abuse before notifying. [1] [13]
Investigations (3). A skeletal survey is indicated for any child under two years with suspected physical abuse, to identify occult fractures — particularly healing posterior rib fractures, classic metaphyseal lesions, and scapular or spinous process fractures. A repeat skeletal survey at 11–14 days may reveal fractures not visible acutely. A bleeding screen (coagulation studies, full blood count) addresses the differential of a bleeding diathesis. Neuroimaging is considered if any features suggest abusive head trauma. [13]
Documentation (3). Document contemporaneously and objectively. Record the history from each parent separately and verbatim in quotation marks, noting the developmental implausibility. Document the examination findings with a body map, including the bruise location and the fracture. Take clinical photographs. Record timed, dated, signed notes. Document who you consulted (senior clinician, child-protection team), when and what you reported to the authority, who you spoke to, and the agency's response. The medical record may become evidence, so it must be factual, non-speculative and complete. [8]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Mathews B, Kenny MC Mandatory reporting legislation in the United States, Canada, and Australia: a cross-jurisdictional review of key features, differences, and issues. Child Maltreatment, 2008.PMID 18174348
- [2]Tonmyr L, Mathews B, Shields ME, Hovdestad WE Does mandatory reporting legislation increase contact with child protection? - a legal doctrinal review and an analytical examination. BMC Public Health, 2018.PMID 30115126
- [6]Flaherty EG, Sege R Barriers to physician identification and reporting of child abuse. Pediatric Annals, 2005.PMID 15948346
- [8]Gilbert R, Kemp A, Thoburn J, Sidebotham P, Radford L, Glaser D, MacMillan HL Recognising and responding to child maltreatment. Lancet, 2009.PMID 19056119
- [13]Lindberg DM, Beaty B, Juarez-Colunga E, Wood JN, Runyan DK Testing for abuse in children with sentinel injuries. Pediatrics, 2015.PMID 26438705
- [16]Morrison SE, Bruce C, Wilson S Children's disclosure of sexual abuse: a systematic review of qualitative research exploring barriers and facilitators. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2018.PMID 29488844