Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds SAQschild-safety-and-social-paediatrics

Paeds SAQs · child-safety-and-social-paediatrics

Mandatory reporting and jurisdictional child-protection frameworks — formative SAQs

Two formative SAQs on mandatory reporting and jurisdictional child-protection frameworks: the reasonable-belief threshold, jurisdictional variation in reporting obligations, barriers and enablers to clinician reporting, and the defensible recognise-to-report pathway.

20 marks30 min4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWEMRCPCH TheoryMRCPCH ClinicalABP General Pediatrics
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DWEMRCPCH TheoryMRCPCH ClinicalABP General Pediatrics
Prompt
Mandatory reporting and jurisdictional child-protection frameworks

SAQ 1 — The reasonable-belief threshold and a sentinel-injury report (10 marks)

A 4-month-old infant is brought to the emergency department by both parents with a swollen left thigh. X-ray reveals a spiral femur fracture. The parents state the infant rolled off the bed, but the infant is not yet rolling over. On examination you also notice a small bruise on the left pinna. [13] [8]

Questions

  1. State the mandatory-reporting threshold and explain why this presentation meets it. (4 marks) [1] [13]
  2. Outline the investigations you would arrange and why. (3 marks) [13]
  3. Describe how you would document this encounter to evidentiary standard. (3 marks) [8]

Model answer

Threshold and why it is met (4). The threshold for mandatory reporting is a reasonable belief that a child has suffered or is at risk of significant harm — not proof, certainty, or a conviction. A spiral femur fracture in a non-rolling infant is developmentally implausible as a fall from a bed, and a bruise on the pinna is an inflicted-injury pattern. A reasonable person in the clinician's position, holding this information, would form a belief that this infant has suffered inflicted injury. The clinician reports; the agency investigates — the clinician does not need to confirm abuse before notifying. [1] [13]

Investigations (3). A skeletal survey is indicated for any child under two years with suspected physical abuse, to identify occult fractures — particularly healing posterior rib fractures, classic metaphyseal lesions, and scapular or spinous process fractures. A repeat skeletal survey at 11–14 days may reveal fractures not visible acutely. A bleeding screen (coagulation studies, full blood count) addresses the differential of a bleeding diathesis. Neuroimaging is considered if any features suggest abusive head trauma. [13]

Documentation (3). Document contemporaneously and objectively. Record the history from each parent separately and verbatim in quotation marks, noting the developmental implausibility. Document the examination findings with a body map, including the bruise location and the fracture. Take clinical photographs. Record timed, dated, signed notes. Document who you consulted (senior clinician, child-protection team), when and what you reported to the authority, who you spoke to, and the agency's response. The medical record may become evidence, so it must be factual, non-speculative and complete. [8]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this SAQ. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References6ShowHide
  1. [1]Mathews B, Kenny MC Mandatory reporting legislation in the United States, Canada, and Australia: a cross-jurisdictional review of key features, differences, and issues. Child Maltreatment, 2008.PMID 18174348
  2. [2]Tonmyr L, Mathews B, Shields ME, Hovdestad WE Does mandatory reporting legislation increase contact with child protection? - a legal doctrinal review and an analytical examination. BMC Public Health, 2018.PMID 30115126
  3. [6]Flaherty EG, Sege R Barriers to physician identification and reporting of child abuse. Pediatric Annals, 2005.PMID 15948346
  4. [8]Gilbert R, Kemp A, Thoburn J, Sidebotham P, Radford L, Glaser D, MacMillan HL Recognising and responding to child maltreatment. Lancet, 2009.PMID 19056119
  5. [13]Lindberg DM, Beaty B, Juarez-Colunga E, Wood JN, Runyan DK Testing for abuse in children with sentinel injuries. Pediatrics, 2015.PMID 26438705
  6. [16]Morrison SE, Bruce C, Wilson S Children's disclosure of sexual abuse: a systematic review of qualitative research exploring barriers and facilitators. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2018.PMID 29488844
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousKinship care, adoption and permanency health assessments — formative SAQschild-safety-and-social-paediatricsNextMedical neglect and refusal of care — formative SAQschild-safety-and-social-paediatrics