Paeds SAQs · fetal-neonatal-and-perinatal
Gestational age assessment and preterm classification — formative SAQs
Formative SAQs on assigning gestational age, reconciling antenatal and postnatal estimates, classifying by gestational-age and birthweight bands, and applying size-for-gestational-age and corrected age.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 (10)
A newborn weighs 2100 g. The obstetric record shows a first-trimester crown-rump-length ultrasound consistent with a last menstrual period of 39 weeks and 4 days. The mother had irregular cycles. [3]
- Explain why this infant is not preterm, and state the correct classification of size-for-gestational-age. (2) [2] [7]
- Describe how you would confirm the gestational age postnatally, and the limitations of that method in this infant. (3) [1]
- Outline the dating hierarchy and the reconciliation rule you would apply if the last menstrual period and the first-trimester ultrasound disagreed by 10 days. (3) [3] [4]
- State the term sub-category this infant falls into and why the category matters. (2) [5]
Model answer
Classification, not prematurity. Gestational age is time from the first day of the last menstrual period to the day of birth, not weight. This infant is term (39+4). Because the weight is below the 10th centile for gestational age, the correct classification is small-for-gestational-age term infant, not preterm. Treating the low weight as prematurity would misdirect screening and follow-up. [2] [7]
Postnatal confirmation and its limits. Perform the New Ballard Score, combining six neuromuscular and six physical criteria, which is reliable to about plus or minus two weeks. In a growth-restricted or oedematous infant the physical criteria (skin, breast bud, plantar creases) can overstate maturity, and the score's accuracy falls, so antenatal ultrasound dating should anchor the estimate and the score is confirmatory. [1]
Dating hierarchy and reconciliation. First-trimester crown-rump-length ultrasound is the reference standard at about 5 to 7 days. When it disagrees with the last menstrual period by more than about 7 days in the first trimester, the ultrasound is preferred, especially with irregular cycles. Here the two agree, so the 39+4 estimate stands. [3] [4]
Term sub-category. At 39+4 the infant is full term (39+0 to 40+6), which carries the lowest morbidity within term; this is why the Defining Term Pregnancy Workgroup split the old single category. [5]
References8ShowHide
- [1]Ballard JL New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants J Pediatr, 1991.PMID 1880657
- [2]Villar J International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project Lancet, 2014.PMID 25209487
- [3]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion No 700: Methods for Estimating the Due Date Obstet Gynecol, 2017.PMID 28426621
- [4]Hadlock FP Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US Radiology, 1992.PMID 1732970
- [5]Spong CY Defining term pregnancy: recommendations from the Defining Term Pregnancy Workgroup JAMA, 2013.PMID 23645117
- [6]Engle WA Late-preterm infants: a population at risk Pediatrics, 2007.PMID 18055691
- [7]Fenton TR A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants BMC Pediatr, 2013.PMID 23601190
- [8]WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age Acta Paediatr Suppl, 2006.PMID 16817681