Paeds SAQs · investigations-procedures-and-technology
Developmental, cognitive and behavioural assessment tools — formative SAQs
Two MedVellum formative short-answer questions on developmental, cognitive and behavioural assessment tools: the principle that surveillance, screening and diagnostic assessment are three different acts with a scheduled screening programme, and the correct interpretation of a positive screen, the standard-score model and the urgent response to regression. The marks and timing support transparent self-assessment. They are not an official board format or pass standard.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — Surveillance, screening and diagnosis: three acts, one schedule (15 marks, 15 minutes)
A registrar asks you to explain how developmental, cognitive and behavioural assessment fits together, from the routine well-child visit to a confirmed diagnosis. [1]
Question. Distinguish developmental surveillance from screening and from diagnostic assessment, state the recommended screening schedule, and name the correct tool for a broadband developmental concern, an autism concern and a diagnostic cognitive assessment. Explain the standard-score model and why a positive screen is never a diagnosis.
[1] [10]Model answer
Three acts (4 marks). Surveillance is the longitudinal, opinion-based monitoring performed at every health visit, drawing on history, examination, observation and parental concern. Screening is a brief, standardised tool applied to the whole population at scheduled ages to find the child who needs a closer look. Diagnostic assessment is the lengthy, trained-administered evaluation that confirms and quantifies a disorder. A screen can never do the diagnostic tool's job. [1]
Schedule (3 marks). Developmental surveillance at every visit, layered with a standardised developmental screen at nine, 18 and 30 months and an autism-specific screen (M-CHAT-R/F) at 18 and 24 months. The scheduled screen reaches the children no one is yet worried about. [1]
The right tool (4 marks). For a broadband developmental concern, a parent-completed screen such as the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (one to 66 months, five domains) or PEDS (nought to eight years, ten concerns). For an autism concern, the M-CHAT-R/F (16 to 30 months). For a diagnostic cognitive assessment, refer for the Bayley Scales up to 42 months, or the Griffiths or Wechsler scales for the older child. A 2024 meta-analysis used Bayley as the reference standard against which the parent-completed screens were compared, confirming that screens do not substitute for diagnostic assessment. [3] [9]
Standard-score model and the meaning of a screen (4 marks). A standard cognitive score has a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, so a score of 70 or below sits two standard deviations below the mean and marks significant concern. Because developmental disability is common but population prevalence is low, a screen's positive predictive value is modest, so a positive screen is a reason to refer, never a diagnosis. [9] [10]
References6ShowHide
- [1]Council on Children With Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, et al Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening Pediatrics, 2006.PMID 16818591
- [3]Squires J, Bricker D, Potter L Revision of a parent-completed development screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 1997.PMID 9212550
- [5]Robins DL, Casagrande K, Barton M, Chen CM, Dumont-Mathieu T, Fein D Validation of the modified checklist for Autism in toddlers, revised with follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F) Pediatrics, 2014.PMID 24366990
- [7]Goodman R Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2001.PMID 11699809
- [9]Balasubramanian H, Ahmed J, Ananthan A, Srinivasan L Comparison of parent or caregiver-completed development screening tools with Bayley Scales of Infant Development: a systematic review and meta-analysis Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2024.PMID 38811056
- [10]Rah SS, Jung M, Lee K, Kang H Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Real-World Accuracy of Children's Developmental Screening Tests Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2023.PMID 36592715