Paeds SAQs · acute-care-resuscitation-and-toxicology
Button-battery and magnet ingestion — formative SAQs
Two MedVellum formative short-answer questions on the child with suspected button-battery or magnet ingestion: confirming ingestion and time, the two-hour endoscopic removal target for an oesophageal battery, the honey and sucralfate adjunct regimen with its eligibility and limits, the high-risk status of two or more magnets, and the recognition of delayed life-threatening complications such as aorto-oesophageal fistula. The marks and timing support transparent self-assessment. They are not an official board format or pass standard.
On this page
Study tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — A drooling three-year-old with a battery
Question 1 — 10 formative marks; suggested time 15 minutes [1]
A three-year-old is brought in drooling and refusing drinks. The parent found a remote control with a missing twenty-millimetre lithium battery two hours ago. The child is alert, has a soft stridor at rest, and is drooling pooling secretions. The heart rate is 130, saturation 97 percent in air. [1]
- State what you do in the first 60 seconds and why. (2 marks)
- Describe the single radiograph you request and the three radiographic signs you look for. (2 marks)
- State the honey adjunct regimen, its eligibility, and its limits. (3 marks)
- Explain the tissue-injury mechanism and why the child needs surveillance after removal. (3 marks)
Full-credit answer — SAQ 1
Reveal full-credit answer for SAQ 1ShowHide
1. First 60 seconds
"This child has a suspected oesophageal button battery with stridor and drooling. I call the senior paediatrician, endoscopist, anaesthetist and ENT or surgical teams now, name a leader, allocate roles, and bring age- and weight-appropriate equipment and monitoring. I keep the child nil by mouth, give oxygen, position for airway safety, and prepare to protect the airway if the stridor worsens or haematemesis develops. Stabilisation precedes diagnosis, and the time since ingestion is already two hours, so the removal clock is running." [1] [5]
2. The radiograph and its signs
"I request a single radiograph from nasopharynx to anus in AP and lateral views. This localises the battery, confirms oesophageal versus gastric position, distinguishes it from a coin, and counts any magnets. The three signs I look for on a button battery are the halo sign and double-ring on the AP view, caused by the step between the larger positive and smaller negative casings, and the step-off or notch at one edge on the lateral view. A neck-only or chest-only film would miss a battery at the cricopharyngeus or a magnet in the stomach." [1] [2]
3. The honey adjunct
"The child is over twelve months and is drooling but, if able to swallow safely with no airway compromise, no suspected perforation, no sepsis and no honey allergy, I give honey 10 millilitres, roughly two teaspoons, by mouth every ten minutes for up to six doses while awaiting endoscopy. The alternative is sucralfate 1 gram per 10 kilograms. The limit is absolute: the adjunct is a bridge that reduces pH at the negative pole, it never replaces or delays endoscopic removal, and honey is contraindicated in infants under twelve months because of the botulism risk. The human evidence is limited to case series and porcine models, so I present it as a promising bridge, not a proven standard." [6] [7]
4. Mechanism and surveillance
"The battery, bathed in oesophageal mucus, acts as a galvanic cell and splits water at its negative pole, generating hydroxide that causes alkaline liquefaction necrosis. Direct-current and pressure necrosis add to the injury. Alkali liquefies tissue, so the injury penetrates deeply and continues after the battery is removed, because tissue weakened by the burn may necrose and perforate days to weeks later. The child needs admission for serial review of delayed perforation, fistula and stricture, because an aorto-oesophageal fistula can present as massive haematemesis days to weeks after an apparently successful removal." [1] [6]
References7ShowHide
- [1]Mubarak A, Benninga MA, Broekaert I, et al. Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Button Battery Ingestion in Childhood: A European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition Position Paper Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2021.PMID 33555169
- [2]Kramer RE, Lerner DG, Lin T, et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies in children: a clinical report of the NASPGHAN Endoscopy Committee Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2015.PMID 25611037
- [5]Goh S, Siu JM, Philteos J, et al. Pediatric Esophageal Button Battery Protocol Reduces Time From Presentation to Removal The Laryngoscope, 2024.PMID 38934450
- [6]Schmidt YM, Muensterer O, Wendling-Keim D The use of honey in button battery ingestions: a systematic review Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023.PMID 37842023
- [7]Chiew AL, Lin CS, Nguyen DT, et al. Home Therapies to Neutralize Button Battery Injury in a Porcine Esophageal Model Annals of emergency medicine, 2024.PMID 37725021
- [9]Altokhais T Magnet Ingestion in Children Management Guidelines and Prevention Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021.PMID 34422734
- [12]Han Y, Youn JK, Oh C, et al. Ingestion of multiple magnets in children Journal of pediatric surgery, 2020.PMID 31937446