Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

Paeds Caseschild-safety-and-social-paediatrics

Paeds Cases · child-safety-and-social-paediatrics

Explain an inflicted immersion scald and the safeguarding plan to a non-offending parent — OSCE

OSCE communication and shared-planning station: explaining to a non-offending parent that their toddler's scald pattern is not consistent with the given history, why the safeguarding pathway must run in parallel with burn care, what the strategy discussion and admission to a place of safety mean, and how the team will keep the child safe while supporting the family.

osce communication and shared planning4 min readVerification in progress

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCE
On this page
Study tools

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCE
Prompt
A father brings his eighteen-month-old son to the ED with a scald to both feet and lower legs stopping at a sharp line above the ankles. He says the boy's mother reported the child pulled a cup of tea over himself. The father is frightened, cooperative, and wants to understand why the team cannot let him take his son home today.

Candidate instructions

You are the paediatric registrar in the emergency department. The father of an eighteen-month-old boy with a scald to both feet has ten minutes with you. The burn pattern — symmetrical, sharp upper margin, no splash marks — is not consistent with the cup-of-tea history the child's mother gave, and your consultant has initiated the safeguarding pathway. The child will be admitted to a place of safety. Explain to the father, in plain language and without accusation: (1) that the burn pattern does not fit the story and what that means; (2) why the team must run the safeguarding assessment in parallel with treating the burn; (3) what a strategy discussion and admission to a place of safety mean; and (4) that the team will support him and his son through the process. Invite his questions, acknowledge his fear, and check understanding. Do not name a perpetrator or accuse the mother; do not use jargon. [7]

Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this case. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Paediatrics Fellowship fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References4ShowHide
  1. [1]Maguire S, Moynihan S, Mann M, et al. A systematic review of the features that indicate intentional scalds in children. Burns, 2008.PMID 18538478
  2. [2]Kemp AM, Hollén L, Emond AM, et al. Raising suspicion of maltreatment from burns: Derivation and validation of the BuRN-Tool. Burns, 2018.PMID 28918905
  3. [6]Peck MD, Priolo-Kapel D Child abuse by burning: a review of the literature and an algorithm for medical investigations. J Trauma, 2002.PMID 12435962
  4. [7]Hettiaratchy S, Dziewulski P ABC of burns: pathophysiology and types of burns. BMJ, 2004.PMID 15191982
Paediatrics Fellowship Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Paediatrics Fellowship library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousExplain a sentinel oral injury and the safeguarding plan to a carer — OSCEchild-safety-and-social-paediatricsNextExplain an unsafe-sleep presentation to a frightened parent — OSCEchild-safety-and-social-paediatrics