Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G TopicsIntrapartum care — multiple pregnancy

O&G · Intrapartum care — multiple pregnancy

Twin birth: mode, timing and intrapartum management

Also known as Twin delivery · Multiple pregnancy birth · Vaginal twin birth · Second twin · Internal podalic version · Breech extraction · Twin Birth Study

Exam-exhaustive FRANZCOG fellowship reference on twin birth — chorionicity-driven timing, mode of birth by presentation of twin 1 and twin 2, the Twin Birth Study and its 2-year follow-up, internal podalic version and breech extraction, the inter-twin interval evidence, combined delivery, and the second-twin risks. RANZCOG-primary, globally tagged to MRCOG and ABOG.

high18 referencesUpdated 26 July 202616 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 10 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic10 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Chorionicity not established before 14 weeks — you have lost the single most important variable in the pregnancy
  • Transverse lie of twin 2 after birth of twin 1 — the strongest predictor of combined delivery; act now, not in five minutes
  • Non-cephalic presenting twin — planned caesarean, not a trial of labour
  • Monoamniotic twins planned for vaginal birth — cord entanglement makes this a caesarean
  • Only one fetal heart being monitored while you believe you are watching two
  • A relaxed team after the second baby — the overdistended uterus is the one that will not contract
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic10 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Chorionicity not established before 14 weeks — you have lost the single most important variable in the pregnancy
  • Transverse lie of twin 2 after birth of twin 1 — the strongest predictor of combined delivery; act now, not in five minutes
  • Non-cephalic presenting twin — planned caesarean, not a trial of labour
  • Monoamniotic twins planned for vaginal birth — cord entanglement makes this a caesarean
  • Only one fetal heart being monitored while you believe you are watching two
  • A relaxed team after the second baby — the overdistended uterus is the one that will not contract
One-line fellowship answer

Chorionicity sets the timing, the presentation of twin 1 sets the mode, and the presentation of twin 2 sets who needs to be in the room — plan birth at 37+0 weeks for dichorionic and by 37+0 weeks for monochorionic diamniotic twins, offer vaginal birth whenever twin 1 is cephalic (the Twin Birth Study found no difference), and be able to perform internal podalic version and breech extraction before you accept the first twin's vaginal birth.[1][6][3]

The registrar's nightmare is not twin 1. Twin 1 behaves like a singleton and delivers like one. The nightmare is the ninety seconds after: the uterus suddenly half-empty, a baby swinging into a transverse lie, a CTG that was fine and now is not, and a decision about whether your hand goes inside or the woman goes to theatre. Everything below is preparation for those ninety seconds.[1][11]

Overview and definition

Twins are classified two ways, and only one of them matters clinically. [3]

  • Zygosity — monozygotic (one egg, splitting) or dizygotic (two eggs). Interesting for the family, largely irrelevant to management.
  • Chorionicity and amnionicity — how many placentas and how many sacs. This is the operative variable: it drives surveillance, timing, and most of the excess risk. RANZCOG C-Obs 42 turns on it, and so does RCOG Green-top 51.[3][4]

Dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA)

  • Two placentas, two sacs — every dizygotic pair, plus the earliest monozygotic splits
  • No shared placental circulation, so no TTTS and no TAPS
  • Lambda (twin peak) sign: a wedge of placental tissue running into a thick dividing membrane
  • Plan birth from 37+0 weeks

Monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA)

  • One placenta, two sacs — a later monozygotic split
  • Shared placental circulation: TTTS, TAPS, selective growth restriction, co-twin demise sequelae
  • T sign: a thin membrane meeting the placenta at a right angle, no wedge
  • Plan birth by 37+0 weeks

Monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA)

  • One placenta, one sac — the latest monozygotic split
  • Cord entanglement is the defining hazard
  • No dividing membrane at all
  • Caesarean birth, timed preterm with inpatient surveillance beforehand
[3] [4] [5]
The 14-week windowChorionicity is determined reliably in the first trimester by the lambda versus T sign, membrane thickness and the number of placental masses. After about 14 weeks the membrane thins and the sign becomes unreliable. A twin pregnancy booked late without chorionicity is managed as monochorionic until proven otherwise — you cannot get that information back.[3][4]
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References18ShowHide
  1. [1]Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 24088091
  2. [2]Asztalos EV, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, et al. Twin Birth Study: 2-year neurodevelopmental follow-up of the randomized trial of planned cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016.PMID 26830380
  3. [3]Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 51 BJOG, 2017.PMID 27862859
  4. [4]Kilby MD, Bricker L Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy Green-Top Guideline No. 51 (2024 Partial Update) BJOG, 2025.PMID 39966091
  5. [5]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231 Obstet Gynecol, 2021.PMID 34011891
  6. [6]Cheong-See F, Schuit E, Arroyo-Manzano D, et al. Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ, 2016.PMID 27599496
  7. [7]Dodd JM, Deussen AR, Grivell RM, Crowther CA Elective birth at 37 weeks' gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014.PMID 24510739
  8. [8]Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Haslam RR, Robinson JS Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial BJOG, 2012.PMID 22691051
  9. [9]Hofmeyr GJ, Barrett JF, Crowther CA Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015.PMID 26684389
  10. [10]Smith GC, Fleming KM, White IR Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994-2003: retrospective cohort study BMJ, 2007.PMID 17337456
  11. [11]Aviram A, Lipworth H, Asztalos EV, et al. The worst of both worlds-combined deliveries in twin gestations: a subanalysis of the Twin Birth Study, a randomized, controlled, prospective study Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019.PMID 31254526
  12. [12]Aviram A, Lipworth H, Asztalos EV, et al. Delivery of monochorionic twins: lessons learned from the Twin Birth Study Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020.PMID 32592694
  13. [13]Benito M, De Bonrostro C, Agustín A, et al. Impact of intertwin interval on short-term neonatal outcomes of the second twin in dichorionic pregnancies with vaginal delivery Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2019.PMID 30771266
  14. [14]Leung TY, Tam WH, Leung TN, et al. Effect of twin-to-twin delivery interval on umbilical cord blood gas in the second twins BJOG, 2002.PMID 11843376
  15. [15]Leung TY, Lok IH, Tam WH, et al. Deterioration in cord blood gas status during the second stage of labour is more rapid in the second twin than in the first twin BJOG, 2004.PMID 15198781
  16. [16]Hiersch L, Shah PS, Khurshid F, et al. Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in extremely preterm Vertex/nonVertex twins Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021.PMID 33306970
  17. [18]Fieni S, Di Ilio C, Kiener AJO, et al. Real-time ultrasound to assist during a vaginal breech delivery Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2024.PMID 37278993
  18. [17]Koch AK, Burger RJ, Schuit E, et al. Timing of Delivery for Twins With Growth Discordance and Growth Restriction: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol, 2022.PMID 35675615

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 10 MCQs
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousTurner syndrome and differences of sex development (DSD) at generalist depthGynaecological health — paediatric, adolescent and congenitalNextUrodynamicsUrogynaecology — lower urinary tract evaluation