Skip to main content
MedVellum
QuestionsVideosPricing

MedVellum

Fellowship exam preparation across every specialty: source-verified topics, questions in every format, and videos.

Product

  • Specialties
  • Questions
  • Videos
  • Exam tools
  • Pricing

Verification & policy

  • Verified register
  • Editorial policy
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Account

  • Sign in
  • Create account
  • Dashboard
  • Account & billing

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

llms.txtPsychiatry LLM catalogSitemap

O&G TopicsAntenatal care — multiple pregnancy

O&G · Antenatal care — multiple pregnancy

Multiple pregnancy — chorionicity, surveillance and timing of birth

Also known as Twin pregnancy · DCDA · MCDA · MCMA · Chorionicity · Monochorionic twins · Multifetal pregnancy

Exam-exhaustive FRANZCOG reference on multiple pregnancy — first-trimester chorionicity/amnionicity determination (lambda versus T sign), DCDA versus MCDA versus MCMA surveillance and timing of birth (37 and 36 weeks respectively), mode of birth (Twin Birth Study), selective reduction, and the complications specific to multiples (TTTS cross-linked). RANZCOG-primary, globally tagged to MRCOG and ABOG.

high13 referencesUpdated 26 July 202611 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

  • 8 MCQs

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Chorionicity not determined or documented at the first-trimester scan drives every subsequent management error in twins — establish it before 14 weeks
  • Applying DCDA surveillance intervals (4-weekly) to an MCDA pregnancy misses TTTS — MCDA needs 2-weekly scans from 16 weeks
  • Acute maternal abdominal distension with polyhydramnios in a monochorionic twin is twin-twin transfusion syndrome until proven otherwise — urgent fetal medicine referral
  • Single intrauterine death in a monochorionic pair carries a high risk of neurological injury to the co-twin — urgent assessment
  • Continuing uncomplicated DCDA twins beyond 38 weeks or MCDA beyond 37 weeks carries a rising stillbirth risk
  • MCMA twins carry a high mortality from cord entanglement — inpatient surveillance and planned preterm caesarean
On this page
Study tools

Your progress

Saved on this device.

Practise this topic8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

FRANZCOGMRCOGABOGFRCSCMRCPI

Red flags

  • Chorionicity not determined or documented at the first-trimester scan drives every subsequent management error in twins — establish it before 14 weeks
  • Applying DCDA surveillance intervals (4-weekly) to an MCDA pregnancy misses TTTS — MCDA needs 2-weekly scans from 16 weeks
  • Acute maternal abdominal distension with polyhydramnios in a monochorionic twin is twin-twin transfusion syndrome until proven otherwise — urgent fetal medicine referral
  • Single intrauterine death in a monochorionic pair carries a high risk of neurological injury to the co-twin — urgent assessment
  • Continuing uncomplicated DCDA twins beyond 38 weeks or MCDA beyond 37 weeks carries a rising stillbirth risk
  • MCMA twins carry a high mortality from cord entanglement — inpatient surveillance and planned preterm caesarean
One-line fellowship answer

Multiple pregnancy is classified and managed by chorionicity and amnionicity, determined at the first-trimester scan — the lambda (delta) sign means dichorionic (DCDA), the T-sign means monochorionic (MCDA). DCDA twins get 4-weekly growth from 20 weeks with planned birth from 37 weeks (no later than 38); MCDA twins get 2-weekly growth and Doppler from 16 weeks with planned birth from 36 weeks. Planned vaginal birth is reasonable if twin 1 is cephalic (Twin Birth Study), and progestogens do not prevent preterm birth in multiples.[1][2][3]

It is the first-trimester booking scan. A 32-year-old woman who conceived by IVF is told she is carrying twins. The first question she asks is whether they are identical — and the question that matters clinically is whether they share a placenta. Chorionicity determines the entire antenatal pathway: the surveillance schedule, the timing of birth, and the risk profile. Get it right at 12 weeks, and the rest follows; get it wrong, and a monochorionic pregnancy is missed. This topic is the chorionicity-driven framework that holds the whole of multiple-pregnancy care together.[1]

Overview and definition

Multiple pregnancy is the presence of more than one fetus. Twins are classified on three axes — zygosity, chorionicity and amnionicity — but only chorionicity and amnionicity drive management.[1][11]

  • Zygosity — monozygotic (identical, from one zygote) versus dizygotic (fraternal, from two zygotes). Zygosity is rarely determined antenatally and does not drive management.
  • Chorionicity — dichorionic (two placentas) versus monochorionic (one shared placenta). This is the key determinant of risk.
  • Amnionicity — diamniotic (two amniotic sacs) versus monoamniotic (one shared sac).

The three clinically important twin types are dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA), monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) and monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA). DCDA twins approach near-singleton outcomes; MCDA twins carry substantially higher perinatal mortality because of the shared circulation (twin-twin transfusion syndrome, twin anaemia polycythaemia sequence, selective FGR); MCMA twins carry the highest mortality from cord entanglement.[1]

Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

Continue reading

You have read the opening of this topic. The complete unit — every section and its primary-source references — is part of the Obstetrics & Gynaecology fellowship library.

Sign in to continueSee pricing
References13ShowHide
  1. [1]Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016.PMID 26577371
  2. [2]Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 24088091
  3. [3]Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Haslam RR, Robinson JS Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial BJOG, 2012.PMID 22691051
  4. [4]Woolcock JG, Grivell RM, Dodd JM Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017.PMID 29108135
  5. [5]Dodd JM, Grivell RM, OBrien CM, Dowswell T, et al. Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019.PMID 31745984
  6. [6]Dodd JM, Grivell RM, OBrien CM, Dowswell T, Deussen AR Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017.PMID 29086920
  7. [7]Kent EM, Breathnach FM, Gillan JE, et al. Placental cord insertion and birthweight discordance in twin pregnancies: results of the national prospective ESPRiT Study Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2011.PMID 21864823
  8. [8]Miller RS, Miller JL, Monson MA, et al. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #72: Twin-twin transfusion syndrome and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2024.PMID 39029545
  9. [9]Mustafa HJ, Javinani A, Heydari MH, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction without concomitant twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, natural history, and risk factors for fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 2023.PMID 37527736
  10. [10]El Emrani S, Groene SG, Verweij EJ, et al. Gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: a systematic literature review Prenat Diagn, 2022.PMID 35808908
  11. [11]Albuquerque Brás S, Ferreira L First trimester scan in twins Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2025.PMID 41175677
  12. [12]Zafarmand MH, Goossens SMTA, Tajik P, et al. Planned Cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twins: secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021.PMID 31674091
  13. [13]Aviram A, Lipworth H, Asztalos EV, et al. Delivery of monochorionic twins: lessons learned from the Twin Birth Study Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020.PMID 32592694

Test yourself

Practise what you just read

  • 8 MCQs
Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pro

$29/ monthor $279 / year

The complete Obstetrics & Gynaecology library, every exam format, one subscription.

  • Complete library for one chosen specialty
  • Timed MCQ mock exams and spaced review
  • Clinical cases & cross-table vivas
See pricingSign in
PreviousMonochorionic twin pregnancyAntenatal care — multiple pregnancyNextMyomectomyGynaecological surgery — uterus-sparing procedures